Literature DB >> 27814833

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Imaging After Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Soterios Gyftopoulos1, Zehava S Rosenberg2, Catherine C Roberts3, Jenny T Bencardino4, Marc Appel5, Steven J Baccei6, R Carter Cassidy7, Eric Y Chang8, Michael G Fox9, Bennett S Greenspan10, Mary G Hochman11, Jon A Jacobson12, Douglas N Mintz13, Joel S Newman14, Nehal A Shah15, Kirstin M Small15, Barbara N Weissman15.   

Abstract

There has been a rapid increase in the number of shoulder arthroplasties, including partial or complete humeral head resurfacing, hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, performed in the United States over the past two decades. Imaging can play an important role in diagnosing the complications that can occur in the setting of these shoulder arthroplasties. This review is divided into two parts. The first part provides a general discussion of various imaging modalities, comprising radiography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine, and their role in providing useful, treatment-guiding information. The second part focuses on the most appropriate imaging algorithms for shoulder arthroplasty complications such as aseptic loosening, infection, fracture, rotator cuff tendon tear, and nerve injury. The evidence-based ACR Appropriateness Criteria guidelines offered in this report were reached via an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) for rating the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. Further analysis and review of the guidelines were performed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. In those instances in which there was insufficient or equivocal data for recommending the appropriate imaging algorithm, expert opinion may have supplemented the available evidence.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appropriateness Criteria; CT; MRI; aseptic loosening; periprosthetic infection; shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27814833     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  Blinded Ultrasound Examination of the Subscapularis Following Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael P O'Malley; Cameron Kia; Alex G Dukas; Mark Cote; Harlan Stock; Lawrence Savoy; Brian A Tinsley; Farhang Alaee; Augustus D Mazzocca; Kevin P Shea
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-02-25

2.  Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Damien Combes; Romain Lancigu; Patrick Desbordes de Cepoy; Filippo Caporilli-Razza; Laurent Hubert; Louis Rony; Christophe Aubé
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-10-08

Review 3.  Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Stephen Gates; Brain Sager; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.