Literature DB >> 27814822

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Palpable Breast Masses.

Jennifer A Harvey1, Mary C Mahoney2, Mary S Newell3, Lisa Bailey4, Lora D Barke5, Carl D'Orsi3, Mary K Hayes6, Peter M Jokich7, Su-Ju Lee2, Constance D Lehman8, Martha B Mainiero9, David A Mankoff10, Samir B Patel11, Handel E Reynolds12, M Linda Sutherland13, Bruce G Haffty14.   

Abstract

A palpable breast mass is one of the most common presenting features of breast carcinoma. However, the clinical features are frequently nonspecific. Imaging performed before biopsy is helpful in characterizing the nature of the mass. For women with clinically detected breast masses, the vast majority will require evaluation with ultrasound. Diagnostic mammography is the initial imaging modality of choice for women aged ≥ 40 years; ultrasound is typically necessary unless a definitively benign mass is identified as the etiology of the clinical finding. For evaluating women aged <30 years and women who are pregnant or lactating, ultrasound is used for initial evaluation. For women aged 30 to 39 years, either ultrasound or diagnostic mammography may be used for initial evaluation. MRI is rarely indicated to evaluate a clinically detected finding. Biopsy is indicated for masses with suspicious features. Short-term follow-up is a reasonable alternative to biopsy for solid masses with probably benign features suggesting fibroadenoma. Correlation between imaging and the clinical finding is essential. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appropriateness criteria; breast mass; breast self-examination; breast ultrasound; clinical breast examination; mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27814822     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  4 in total

1.  Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation.

Authors:  Ophira Ginsburg; Cheng-Har Yip; Ari Brooks; Anna Cabanes; Maira Caleffi; Jorge Antonio Dunstan Yataco; Bishal Gyawali; Valerie McCormack; Myrna McLaughlin de Anderson; Ravi Mehrotra; Alejandro Mohar; Raul Murillo; Lydia E Pace; Electra D Paskett; Anya Romanoff; Anne F Rositch; John R Scheel; Miriam Schneidman; Karla Unger-Saldaña; Verna Vanderpuye; Tsu-Yin Wu; Safina Yuma; Allison Dvaladze; Catherine Duggan; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Role of core needle biopsy in primary breast lymphoma.

Authors:  Giulia Bicchierai; Luigi Rigacci; Vittorio Miele; Icro Meattini; Diego De Benedetto; Valeria Selvi; Simonetta Bianchi; Lorenzo Livi; Jacopo Nori
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Evaluating the role of strain ratio elastography in determining malignancy potential and calculating objective BIRADS US scores using ultrasonography and elastography features.

Authors:  Deniz Özel; Betül Duran Özel
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-08

Review 4.  Breast Imaging of Transgender Individuals: A Review.

Authors:  Emily B Sonnenblick; Ami D Shah; Zil Goldstein; Tamar Reisman
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.