Literature DB >> 27814429

Effects of Residual Stress, Axial Stretch, and Circumferential Shrinkage on Coronary Plaque Stress and Strain Calculations: A Modeling Study Using IVUS-Based Near-Idealized Geometries.

Liang Wang1, Jian Zhu2, Habib Samady3, David Monoly3, Jie Zheng4, Xiaoya Guo5, Akiko Maehara6, Chun Yang7, Genshan Ma2, Gary S Mintz6, Dalin Tang8.   

Abstract

Accurate stress and strain calculations are important for plaque progression and vulnerability assessment. Models based on in vivo data often need to form geometries with zero-stress/strain conditions. The goal of this paper is to use IVUS-based near-idealized geometries and introduce a three-step model construction process to include residual stress, axial shrinkage, and circumferential shrinkage and investigate their impacts on stress and strain calculations. In Vivo intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data of human coronary were acquired for model construction. In Vivo IVUS movie data were acquired and used to determine patient-specific material parameter values. A three-step modeling procedure was used to make our model: (a) wrap the zero-stress vessel sector to obtain the residual stress; (b) stretch the vessel axially to its length in vivo; and (c) pressurize the vessel to recover its in vivo geometry. Eight models were constructed for our investigation. Wrapping led to reduced lumen and cap stress and increased out boundary stress. The model with axial stretch, circumferential shrink, but no wrapping overestimated lumen and cap stress by 182% and 448%, respectively. The model with wrapping, circumferential shrink, but no axial stretch predicted average lumen stress and cap stress as 0.76 kPa and -15 kPa. The same model with 10% axial stretch had 42.53 kPa lumen stress and 29.0 kPa cap stress, respectively. Skipping circumferential shrinkage leads to overexpansion of the vessel and incorrect stress/strain calculations. Vessel stiffness increase (100%) leads to 75% lumen stress increase and 102% cap stress increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27814429      PMCID: PMC5125309          DOI: 10.1115/1.4034867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  23 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Biomechanics of plaque rupture: progress, problems, and new frontiers.

Authors:  Peter D Richardson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.

Authors:  Anuja Nair; Barry D Kuban; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; Steven E Nissen; D Geoffrey Vince
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Strain distribution in small blood vessels with zero-stress state taken into consideration.

Authors:  Y C Fung; S Q Liu
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-02

5.  Using in vivo Cine and 3D multi-contrast MRI to determine human atherosclerotic carotid artery material properties and circumferential shrinkage rate and their impact on stress/strain predictions.

Authors:  Haofei Liu; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan; Chun Yang; Kristen Billiar; Zhongzhao Teng; Allen H Hoffman; Dalin Tang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Patient-specific artery shrinkage and 3D zero-stress state in multi-component 3D FSI models for carotid atherosclerotic plaques based on in vivo MRI data.

Authors:  Xueying Huang; Chun Yang; Chun Yuan; Fei Liu; Gador Canton; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Gregorio A Sicard; Dalin Tang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biomech       Date:  2009-06

7.  Biomechanical interaction between cap thickness, lipid core composition and blood pressure in vulnerable coronary plaque: impact on stability or instability.

Authors:  Gérard Finet; Jacques Ohayon; Gilles Rioufol
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.439

8.  Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels.

Authors:  H M Loree; R D Kamm; R G Stringfellow; R T Lee
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Coronary plaque structural stress is associated with plaque composition and subtype and higher in acute coronary syndrome: the BEACON I (Biomechanical Evaluation of Atheromatous Coronary Arteries) study.

Authors:  Zhongzhao Teng; Adam J Brown; Patrick A Calvert; Richard A Parker; Daniel R Obaid; Yuan Huang; Stephen P Hoole; Nick E J West; Jonathan H Gillard; Martin R Bennett
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Morphological and Stress Vulnerability Indices for Human Coronary Plaques and Their Correlations with Cap Thickness and Lipid Percent: An IVUS-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Multi-patient Study.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Jie Zheng; Akiko Maehara; Chun Yang; Kristen L Billiar; Zheyang Wu; Richard Bach; David Muccigrosso; Gary S Mintz; Dalin Tang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

1.  A pragmatic approach to understand peripheral artery lumen surface stiffness due to plaque heterogeneity.

Authors:  Erica E Neumann; Melissa Young; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  A platform for high-fidelity patient-specific structural modelling of atherosclerotic arteries: from intravascular imaging to three-dimensional stress distributions.

Authors:  Karim Kadry; Max L Olender; David Marlevi; Elazer R Edelman; Farhad R Nezami
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Multi-patient study for coronary vulnerable plaque model comparisons: 2D/3D and fluid-structure interaction simulations.

Authors:  Qingyu Wang; Dalin Tang; Liang Wang; Akiko Meahara; David Molony; Habib Samady; Jie Zheng; Gary S Mintz; Gregg W Stone; Don P Giddens
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  Computational modeling of progressive damage and rupture in fibrous biological tissues: application to aortic dissection.

Authors:  Osman Gültekin; Sandra Priska Hager; Hüsnü Dal; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-05-15

5.  Mechanical Characterization of the Vessel Wall by Data Assimilation of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies.

Authors:  Gonzalo D Maso Talou; Pablo J Blanco; Gonzalo D Ares; Cristiano Guedes Bezerra; Pedro A Lemos; Raúl A Feijóo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.