BACKGROUND: Resin infiltration may alter the mechanical properties of enamel hypomineralised lesions (HL); however, variable surface layer (SL) thickness may affect resin penetration. AIMS: To determine the thickness of the SL of HL and to investigate the effect of resin infiltration on the mechanical properties of HL. DESIGN: The thickness of the SL over HL was determined using polarised light microscopy. Etching time using 15% HCl gel to remove the SL of 52 samples was determined. Selected HL and control areas of 21 teeth were infiltrated with Icon® resin infiltrant, and cross-sectional Knoop microhardness (KHN) measurements were recorded before and after resin infiltration. RESULTS: Ninety-six point five per cent of HL had a detectable SL with mean thickness of 58 ± 29 μm. Application of HCl for 120 s produced a mean MIH erosion depth of 58 ± 12 μm. Eleven of 21 samples had evidence of infiltration using visual examination. The infiltrant penetrated some of the HL leading to an increase in KHN (111 ± 75 KHN) which, when compared to adjacent non-infiltrated HL (96 ± 52 KHN), was not statistically significantly different (P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: There was marked variation in the SL thickness of HL. Resin infiltration of HL did not increase microhardness significantly.
BACKGROUND: Resin infiltration may alter the mechanical properties of enamel hypomineralised lesions (HL); however, variable surface layer (SL) thickness may affect resin penetration. AIMS: To determine the thickness of the SL of HL and to investigate the effect of resin infiltration on the mechanical properties of HL. DESIGN: The thickness of the SL over HL was determined using polarised light microscopy. Etching time using 15% HCl gel to remove the SL of 52 samples was determined. Selected HL and control areas of 21 teeth were infiltrated with Icon® resin infiltrant, and cross-sectional Knoop microhardness (KHN) measurements were recorded before and after resin infiltration. RESULTS: Ninety-six point five per cent of HL had a detectable SL with mean thickness of 58 ± 29 μm. Application of HCl for 120 s produced a mean MIH erosion depth of 58 ± 12 μm. Eleven of 21 samples had evidence of infiltration using visual examination. The infiltrant penetrated some of the HL leading to an increase in KHN (111 ± 75 KHN) which, when compared to adjacent non-infiltrated HL (96 ± 52 KHN), was not statistically significantly different (P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: There was marked variation in the SL thickness of HL. Resin infiltration of HL did not increase microhardness significantly.
Authors: Jyothi Mandava; Y Shilpa Reddy; Sirisha Kantheti; Uma Chalasani; Ravi Chandra Ravi; Roopesh Borugadda; Ravi Kumar Konagala Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2017-04-01