Literature DB >> 27813051

Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone do not Appear to be Useful Biomarkers for Monitoring Hydrocortisone Replacement in Addison's Disease.

I L Ross1, M Lacerda2, T S Pillay3, D J Blom4, G Johannsson5, J A Dave1, N S Levitt1, D Haarburger6, J-S van der Walt7.   

Abstract

Salivary cortisol has been used to monitor hydrocortisone replacement in patients with Addison's disease (AD). Since salivary cortisol is metabolised to salivary cortisone, it may be an adjunctive analyte to assess adequacy of hydrocortisone replacement in patients with AD. We aimed to characterise the exposure of salivary cortisol and cortisone in patients and healthy controls. We measured salivary cortisol and cortisone by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and constructed a day curve (08:00 until 24:00 h) with 16 time points in 25 AD patients taking their usual hydrocortisone dose and in 26 healthy controls. The median (interquartile range) area under the curve (AUC) for cortisol was not different for patients, compared with controls [55.63 (32.91-151.07) nmol*min*l-1 vs. 37.49 (27.41-52.00) nmol*min*l-1; p=0.098, respectively], whereas the peak cortisol Cmax was higher in patients [32.61 (5.75-146.19) nmol/l vs. 8.96 (6.96-12.23) nmol/l; p=0.013], compared with controls. The AUC for cortisone [23.65 (6.10-54.76) nmol*min*l-1 vs. 227.73 (200.10-280.52) nmol*min*l-1; p≤ 0.001, respectively], and peak cortisone Cmax was lower in patients than in controls [11.11 (2.91-35.85) nmol/l vs. 33.12 (25.97-39.95) nmol/l; p=0.002]. The AUC for salivary cortisol and salivary cortisone were not correlated with any measures of hydrocortisone dose. The time-course and AUC of salivary cortisol were similar between Addison's patients and healthy controls. Patients had substantially lower salivary cortisone AUC, compared to healthy controls. Salivary cortisol AUC and pharmacokinetics were not related to hydrocortisone dose and thus are not likely useful markers for the adequacy of hydrocortisone replacement. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27813051     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-118182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Metab Res        ISSN: 0018-5043            Impact factor:   2.936


  7 in total

1.  Detectable prednisolone is delayed in pericardial fluid, compared with plasma of patients with tuberculous pericarditis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Justin Shenje; Tawanda Gumbo; Lubbe Wiesner; Mpiko Ntsekhe; Bongani Mayosi; Ian Ross
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Dried urine and salivary profiling for complete assessment of cortisol and cortisol metabolites.

Authors:  Mark Newman; Desmond A Curran; Bryan P Mayfield
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11-27

3.  Potential Transcriptional Biomarkers to Guide Glucocorticoid Replacement in Autoimmune Addison's Disease.

Authors:  Åse Bjorvatn Sævik; Anette B Wolff; Sigridur Björnsdottir; Katerina Simunkova; Martha Schei Hynne; David William Peter Dolan; Eirik Bratland; Per M Knappskog; Paal Methlie; Siri Carlsen; Magnus Isaksson; Sophie Bensing; Olle Kämpe; Eystein S Husebye; Kristian Løvås; Marianne Øksnes
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 4.  Clinical and Technical Aspects in Free Cortisol Measurement.

Authors:  Man Ho Choi
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 5.  Characteristics and Challenges of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency in Africa: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thabiso R P Mofokeng; Salem A Beshyah; Ian L Ross
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Improved salivary cortisol rhythm with dual-release hydrocortisone

Authors:  Filippo Ceccato; Elisa Selmin; Chiara Sabbadin; Miriam Dalla Costa; Giorgia Antonelli; Mario Plebani; Mattia Barbot; Corado Betterle; Marco Boscaro; Carla Scaroni
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 7.  Clinical Unmet Needs in the Treatment of Adrenal Crisis: Importance of the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Kim M J A Claessen; Cornelie D Andela; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.