Literature DB >> 27813044

[Application of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in German Medical Schools: An Inventory].

S Müller1, U Dahmen2, U Settmacher1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The German medical licensing regulations, as amended by the government in 2002, now require the assessment of clinical skills in undergraduate medical education. As a result, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was introduced as an assessment tool in many medical schools. This article provides a detailed inventory of the current application of the OSCE assessment in Germany.
METHODS: From June to September 2015, the implementation of the OSCE in all 36 German medical schools was investigated using semi-structured telephone interviews and email correspondence. The areas of focus comprised implementation of the OSCE, and number and type of performance records according to the medical licensing regulations or involved disciplines. Following collection, data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively.
RESULTS: All medical schools (100%) participated in the survey. Nearly every school (94%) has introduced the OSCE into its assessment portfolio, however, to varying extents. For each location, the numbers range between 0 and 18 (M=4.7) performance records of the clinical science section assessed by OSCEs. The implementation of this assessment format includes most of the clinical performance records, but more than half (51.4%) of these cover surgery, internal medicine, emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, and orthopaedics.
CONCLUSION: The results reported in this paper confirm the widespread introduction of the OSCE assessment in German medical schools. However, the implementation remains heterogeneous with respect to the scope, schools and individual disciplines involved in the process. In order to ensure extensive clinical competence of prospective physicians the application of the OSCE should be broadened. For this purpose, further information to convince medical school staff is still required. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27813044     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  3 in total

1.  A pilot survey of student perceptions on the benefit of the OSCE and MCQ modalities.

Authors:  Stefan Müller; Utz Settmacher; Ines Koch; Uta Dahmen
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-15

2.  Performance Assessment of Emergency Teams and Communication in Trauma Care (PERFECT checklist)-Explorative analysis, development and validation of the PERFECT checklist: Part of the prospective longitudinal mixed-methods EPPTC trial.

Authors:  David Häske; Stefan K Beckers; Marzellus Hofmann; Rolf Lefering; Christine Preiser; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Paul Alfred Grützner; Ulrich Stöckle; Matthias Münzberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Quality Control in the Clinical Medical Laboratory Based on Mobile Medical Edge Computing.

Authors:  Guorong Wang; Yukun Xue; Jie Lv
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.009

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.