Patrick G Gavin1, Nan Song1, S Rim Kim1, Corey Lipchik1, Nicole L Johnson1, Hanna Bandos2, Melanie Finnigan1, Priya Rastogi3, Louis Fehrenbacher4, Eleftherios P Mamounas5, Sandra M Swain6, D Lawrence Wickerham7, Charles E Geyer8, Jong-Hyeon Jeong9, Joseph P Costantino9, Norman Wolmark7, Soonmyung Paik10, Kay L Pogue-Geile1. 1. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania4Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Vallejo, California. 5. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania5UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida. 6. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania6Washington Cancer Institute, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC7Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. 7. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania8Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 8. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania9Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond. 9. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania10Severance Biomedical Science Institute and Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Preclinical models and studies in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings suggest that single nucleotide polymorphisms in FCGR3A and FCGR2A may be associated with differential response to trastuzumab in the treatment of ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer, by modulating antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxic effects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of FCGR2A and FCGR3A polymorphisms on trastuzumab efficacy in the adjuvant treatment of ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-31 trial, a phase 3 cooperative group study conducted between 2000 and 2005. The NSABP B-31 trial randomized 2119 women with surgically resected node-positive, ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer to treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or the same regimen with the addition of 1 year of weekly trastuzumab. Patients were accrued at cooperative group sites across the United States and Canada. This analysis was performed between 2013 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or the same regimen with the addition of 1 year of weekly trastuzumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Disease-free survival. RESULTS: The genotyped cohort (N = 1251) resembled the entire B-31 cohort based on clinical variables and the degree of benefit from trastuzumab. Median follow-up time was 8.2 years in the genotyped samples. The disease-free survival probability at 3, 5, and 8 years was 74% (95% CI, 71%-79%), 66% (95% CI, 62%-71%), and 58% (95% CI, 54%-63%) in patients who received ACT and 86% (95% CI, 83%-89%), 82% (95% CI, 79%-85%), and 78% (95% CI, 74%-81%) in patients who received ACTH. Addition of trastuzumab significantly improved patient outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57; P < .001). The expected trend for interaction between polymorphisms and trastuzumab was observed for both genes, but only FCGR3A-158 polymorphism reached statistical significance for interaction (P < .001). As hypothesized, patients with genotypes FCB3A-158V/V or FCB3A-158V/F received greater benefit from trastuzumab (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.22-0.43; P < .001) than patients who were homozygous for the low-affinity allele (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The FCGR3A-158 polymorphism is predictive of trastuzumab efficacy in this cohort of patients with early ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients who are homozygous for phenylalanine at this position represent a considerable proportion of the population and, in contrast to previously reported analyses from similarly designed trials, our results indicate that trastuzumab may be less efficacious in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00004067.
IMPORTANCE: Preclinical models and studies in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings suggest that single nucleotide polymorphisms in FCGR3A and FCGR2A may be associated with differential response to trastuzumab in the treatment of ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer, by modulating antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxic effects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of FCGR2A and FCGR3A polymorphisms on trastuzumab efficacy in the adjuvant treatment of ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-31 trial, a phase 3 cooperative group study conducted between 2000 and 2005. The NSABP B-31 trial randomized 2119 women with surgically resected node-positive, ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer to treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or the same regimen with the addition of 1 year of weekly trastuzumab. Patients were accrued at cooperative group sites across the United States and Canada. This analysis was performed between 2013 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or the same regimen with the addition of 1 year of weekly trastuzumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Disease-free survival. RESULTS: The genotyped cohort (N = 1251) resembled the entire B-31 cohort based on clinical variables and the degree of benefit from trastuzumab. Median follow-up time was 8.2 years in the genotyped samples. The disease-free survival probability at 3, 5, and 8 years was 74% (95% CI, 71%-79%), 66% (95% CI, 62%-71%), and 58% (95% CI, 54%-63%) in patients who received ACT and 86% (95% CI, 83%-89%), 82% (95% CI, 79%-85%), and 78% (95% CI, 74%-81%) in patients who received ACTH. Addition of trastuzumab significantly improved patient outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57; P < .001). The expected trend for interaction between polymorphisms and trastuzumab was observed for both genes, but only FCGR3A-158 polymorphism reached statistical significance for interaction (P < .001). As hypothesized, patients with genotypes FCB3A-158V/V or FCB3A-158V/F received greater benefit from trastuzumab (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.22-0.43; P < .001) than patients who were homozygous for the low-affinity allele (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The FCGR3A-158 polymorphism is predictive of trastuzumab efficacy in this cohort of patients with early ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients who are homozygous for phenylalanine at this position represent a considerable proportion of the population and, in contrast to previously reported analyses from similarly designed trials, our results indicate that trastuzumab may be less efficacious in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00004067.
Authors: J Wu; J C Edberg; P B Redecha; V Bansal; P M Guyre; K Coleman; J E Salmon; R P Kimberly Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1997-09-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Charles L Vogel; Melody A Cobleigh; Debu Tripathy; John C Gutheil; Lyndsay N Harris; Louis Fehrenbacher; Dennis J Slamon; Maureen Murphy; William F Novotny; Michael Burchmore; Steven Shak; Stanford J Stewart; Michael Press Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nadine Norton; Rebecca M Olson; Mark Pegram; Kathleen Tenner; Karla V Ballman; Raphael Clynes; Keith L Knutson; Edith A Perez Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Rony Dahan; Emanuela Sega; John Engelhardt; Mark Selby; Alan J Korman; Jeffrey V Ravetch Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Steve C Lee; Raghvendra M Srivastava; Andrés López-Albaitero; Soldano Ferrone; Robert L Ferris Journal: Immunol Res Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.829
Authors: K Tamura; C Shimizu; T Hojo; S Akashi-Tanaka; T Kinoshita; K Yonemori; T Kouno; N Katsumata; M Ando; K Aogi; F Koizumi; K Nishio; Y Fujiwara Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Marelize Swart; Wesley M Stansberry; Victoria M Pratt; Elizabeth B Medeiros; Patrick J Kiel; Fei Shen; Bryan P Schneider; Todd C Skaar Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Rim S Kim; Nan Song; Patrick G Gavin; Roberto Salgado; Hanna Bandos; Zuzana Kos; Giuseppe Floris; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Sunil Badve; Sandra Demaria; Priya Rastogi; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Sandra M Swain; D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Soonmyung Paik; Norman Wolmark; Charles E Geyer; Peter C Lucas; Katherine L Pogue-Geile Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Julia Caroline Radosa; Lisa Stotz; Carolin Müller; Askin Canguel Kaya; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Marc Philipp Radosa Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Juan J Mata-Molanes; Joseba Rebollo-Liceaga; Elena Mª Martínez-Navarro; Ramón González Manzano; Antonio Brugarolas; Manel Juan; Manuel Sureda Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Keneuoe Cecilia Nthontho; Andrew Khulekani Ndlovu; Kirthana Sharma; Ishmael Kasvosve; Daniel Louis Hertz; Giacomo Maria Paganotti Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med Date: 2022-06-21
Authors: Melanie Royce; Christy L Osgood; Anup K Amatya; Mallorie H Fiero; C J George Chang; Tiffany K Ricks; Krithika A Shetty; Jeffrey Kraft; Junshan Qiu; Pengfei Song; Rosane Charlab; Jingyu Yu; Kathryn E King; Anshu Rastogi; Brian Janelsins; Wendy C Weinberg; Kathleen Clouse; Vicky Borders-Hemphill; Lindsey Brown; Candace Gomez-Broughton; Zhong Li; Thuy Thanh Nguyen; Zhihao Qiu; Anh-Thy Ly; Suyoung Chang; Tingting Gao; Chi-Ming Tu; Bellinda King-Kallimanis; William F Pierce; Kelly Chiang; Clara Lee; Kirsten B Goldberg; John K Leighton; Shenghui Tang; Richard Pazdur; Julia A Beaver; Laleh Amiri-Kordestani Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Hongtao Zhang; Lian Lam; Yasuhiro Nagai; Zhiqiang Zhu; Xi Chen; Mei Q Ji; Mark I Greene Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 8.110