| Literature DB >> 27812227 |
Franciska T de Vries1, Tancredi Caruso2.
Abstract
An increasing number of empirical studies are challenging the central fundamentals on which the classical soil food web model is built. This model assumes that bacteria consume labile substrates twice as fast as fungi, and that mycorrhizal fungi do not decompose organic matter. Here, we build on emerging evidence that points to significant consumption of labile C by fungi, and to the ability of ectomycorrhizal fungi to decompose organic matter, to show that labile C constitutes a major and presently underrated source of C for the soil food web. We use a simple model describing the dynamics of a recalcitrant and a labile C pool and their consumption by fungi and bacteria to show that fungal and bacterial populations can coexist in a stable state with large inputs into the labile C pool and a high fungal use of labile C. We propose a new conceptual model for the bottom trophic level of the soil food web, with organic C consisting of a continuous pool rather than two or three distinct pools, and saprotrophic fungi using substantial amounts of labile C. Incorporation of these concepts will increase our understanding of soil food web dynamics and functioning under changing conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteria; Food web interactions; Fungi; Modelling; Root exudates; Soil food web
Year: 2016 PMID: 27812227 PMCID: PMC5061327 DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soil Biol Biochem ISSN: 0038-0717 Impact factor: 7.609
Fig. 1Simple model incorporating the effects of two C pools on saprotrophic fungal and bacterial dynamics, as in Moore et al. (2004). Grey arrows represent the creation of new detritus from external and internal sources, black arrows represent the flow of detritus derived energy, and the dashed line represents ontogenetic change of detritus and the effects fungi and bacteria have on this process. In the original model (a), fungi mostly consumed recalcitrant material, supplemented by a small amount of labile detritus, while bacteria only consumed labile detritus. In our proposed model (b), inputs into the labile detritus pool are increased, as well as fungal consumption of this pool (note that in our model, the arrow via which bacteria affect the ontogenetic production of labile C from recalcitrant C has been removed, since no bacterial consumption of recalcitrant litter exists in the model). After initial model exploration, (see Supplementary Methods), we created a number of scenarios to investigate the behaviour of the model under our proposed modifications. In panels c to f, each dot shows the long term equilibrium value of one scenario. Scenarios differ only for four parameters (which all consist of intrinsic rates per unit biomass): the labile pool input rate (arrow 1), the labile pool consumption rate of both bacteria (arrow 2) and fungi (arrow 3), and the transfer rate of material from the recalcitrant to the labile pool by fungi (arrow 4). Low rates scenarios (light shades) had low values for all four parameters, while high rate scenarios (dark shades) had high values: as the external input to the labile pool increases, both fungi and bacteria increase the consumption rate of the labile pool. Fungi can achieve high consumption of the labile pool while also consuming the recalcitrant pool. These increased rates also correspond to increased fungal mediated transfers from the recalcitrant to the labile pools. The scenarios were designed to cover a broad range of parameter variation while keeping the ratios within reasonable values. Fungi increase with increased input to the labile pool (c) but bacteria do too as shown by the variation of the fungal to bacterial ratio in relation to the pools ratio (d and e). These dynamics also create a positive relationship between the fungal to bacterial ratio and return time to equilibrium after perturbations (f), implying that communities dominated by fungi are less resilient to perturbation than those dominated by bacteria. For all parameters and modelling details see Supplementary Methods.
Fig. 2Conceptual model depicting the role of C inputs for the bottom trophic level of the soil food web, and the overlapping, fluent C use abilities of mycorrhizal fungi, saprotrophic fungi, and bacteria. Shading of boxes and arrows indicates the quality of C, with lighter shades indicating highly labile C. Solid arrows indicate C flow. Dashed arrows indicate mycorrhizal and decomposer fungi mediated decomposition and transfer of labile C (see text for details on the different mechanisms). Note that for clarity, no distinction is made between ectomycorrhizal fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.