Literature DB >> 2781213

Nasal surgery: does the type of nasal pack influence the results?

M G Watson1, J B Campbell, P M Shenoi.   

Abstract

A prospective study was performed on 106 patients undergoing routine nasal surgery to compare the influence of three different packing methods on the final outcome. Pneumatic balloons were found to cause persistent nasal obstruction and an increased incidence of adhesion formation, while lubricated ribbon gauze was more uncomfortable for the patient. Glove finger packs were associated with the least problems.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2781213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN： 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  4 in total

1.  The effect of lidocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine in nasal packs on pain and hemorrhage after septoplasty.

Authors:  Emin Karaman; Gurcan Gungor; Yalcin Alimoglu; Erkan Kilic; Eylem Tarakci; Pervin Bozkurt; Ozgun Enver
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Routine nasal packing follwoing nasal surgery-Is it necessary?

Authors:  S I Basha; D Gupta; S K Kaluskar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-01

3.  Comparison of the effect of the lidocaine, tetracaine, and articaine application into nasal packs on pain and hemorrhage after septoplasty.

Authors:  Vahit Mutlu; Zülküf Kaya
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Day-case endoscopic sinus surgery using dissolvable haemostatic nasal packs: a pilot study.

Authors:  P D Karkos; T Thinakararajan; P Goodyear; V R Srinivasan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.236
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.