| Literature DB >> 27812011 |
Mariya E Ivanova1, Sonia Escolástico2, Maria Balaguer1, Justinas Palisaitis3, Yoo Jung Sohn1, Wilhelm A Meulenberg1, Olivier Guillon1, Joachim Mayer3, Jose M Serra2.
Abstract
Hydrogen permeation membranes are a key element in improving the energy conversion efficiency and decreasing the greenhouse gas emissions from energy generation. The scientific community faces the challenge of identifying and optimizing stable and effective ceramic materials for H2 separation membranes at elevated temperature (400-800 °C) for industrial separations and intensified catalytic reactors. As such, composite materials with nominal composition BaCe0.8Eu0.2O3-δ:Ce0.8Y0.2O2-δ revealed unprecedented H2 permeation levels of 0.4 to 0.61 mL·min-1·cm-2 at 700 °C measured on 500 μm-thick-specimen. A detailed structural and phase study revealed single phase perovskite and fluorite starting materials synthesized via the conventional ceramic route. Strong tendency of Eu to migrate from the perovskite to the fluorite phase was observed at sintering temperature, leading to significant Eu depletion of the proton conducing BaCe0.8Eu0.2O3-δ phase. Composite microstructure was examined prior and after a variety of functional tests, including electrical conductivity, H2-permeation and stability in CO2 containing atmospheres at elevated temperatures, revealing stable material without morphological and structural changes, with segregation-free interfaces and no further diffusive effects between the constituting phases. In this context, dual phase material based on BaCe0.8Eu0.2O3-δ:Ce0.8Y0.2O2-δ represents a very promising candidate for H2 separating membrane in energy- and environmentally-related applications.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27812011 PMCID: PMC5095711 DOI: 10.1038/srep34773
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Based on literature summary of thickness (L)-normalized values of H2 permeation rates j through ceramic membranes.
| Material | Ref. | Gas atmosphere Feed – Sweep | T (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La5.5WO11.25-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 750/900 | 1.5·10−3/4.7·10−3 | |
| La5.5W0.8Mo0.2O11.25-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 700 | 2.7·10−3 | |
| La5.5W0.8Re0.2O11.25-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 700 | 5.9·10−3 | |
| Nd5.5WO11.25-δ | wet 20% H2 in He – wet Ar | 1000 | 1.2·10−3 | |
| (Nd5/6La1/6)5.5WO12-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 1.2·10−3 | |
| (La5/6Nd1/6)5.5WO12-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 1.4·10−3 | |
| Nd5.5W0.5Mo0.5O11.25-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 7.5·10−3 | |
| Nd5.5W0.5Re0.5O11.25-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 4.1·10−3 | |
| BaCe0.80Y0.10Ru0.10O3-δ | wet H2 in Ar – Ar | 800 | 4.3·10−3 | |
| BaCe0.95Nd0.05O3-δ | wet 80% H2 in He – dry Ar + Ne | 900 | 1.3·10−3 | |
| BaZr0.80Y0.15Mn0.05O3-δ | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 1.4·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.95Tm0.05O3-δ | 10% H2 in He – air | 700/900 | 1.2·10−3/1.9·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.95Tm0.05O3-δ | 10% H2 in He – air | 700/900 | 2.6·10−3/6.4·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.95Tm0.05O3-δ | 10% H2 dry in He – 20% O2 in Ar | 750/900 | 4.3·10−3/6.8·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.95Tb0.05O3-δ | 20% H2 in He – CO in Ar | 750/900 | 4.0·10−4/1.6·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.95Y0.05O3-δ | 80% H2 in He – Ar | 900 | 3.2·10−4 | |
| SrCe0.95Yb0.05O3-δ | 10% H2 in He – air | 677 | 2.7·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.95Eu0.05O3-δ | 100% H2 – He | 700/850 | 2.3·10−4/7.4·10−4 | |
| SrCe0.95Sm0.05O3-δ | 100% H2 – He | 850 | 5.4·10−4 | |
| SrCe0.75Zr0.20Tm0.05O3-δ | H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 5.0·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.75Zr0.20Tm0.05O3-δ | 10% H2 dry in He – 20% O2 in Ar | 750/900 | 8.0·10−4/2.4·10−3 | |
| SrCe0.70Zr0.25Ln0.05O3-δ (Ln = Tm, Yb) | wet 20% H2 – wet sweep (not specified) | 900 | 2.3·10−4 | |
| SrCe0.65Zr0.20Eu0.15O3-δ | 100% H2 – He | 900 | 8.5·10−4 | |
| SrZr0.95Y0.05O3-δ | 20% H2 – air in He | 700 | <2.3·10−5 | |
| BaCe0.95Tb0.05O3-δ:Ni (50:50 wt.%) | 50% H2 in N2 – He | 850 | 8.3·10−3 | |
| BaCe0.90Y0.10O3-δ:Ni (60:40 vol.%) | 4% H2 in He – 100 ppm H2 in N2 | 800 | 1.7·10−2 | |
| BaCe0.80Y0.20O3-δ:Ni (60:40 vol.%) | 3.8% H2 in N2 – 100 ppm H2 in N2 | 900 | 2.0·10−3 | |
| BaCe0.85Zr0.10Tb0.05O3-δ:Ni (50:50 wt.%) | 50% H2 in 50% He -Ar | 800 | 8.5·10−3 | |
| BaCe0.70Zr0.10Y0.20O3-δ:Ni (60:40 vol.%) | 4% H2 in He – 100 ppm H2 in N2 | 900 | 5.6·10−3 | |
| BaCe0.70Zr0.10Y0.10Yb0.10O3-δ:Ni (60:40 vol.%) | 20% H2 wet, 60% CO2, 20% He - N2 | 900 | 3.5·10−3 | |
| Ce0.50La0.4875Ca0.0125O2-δ:Ni (60:40 vol.%) | wet 20% H2, 77% N2 – Ar | 900 | 1.5·10−3 | |
| YSZ:Pd (40:60 vol.%) | 90% H2 in He – N2 | 400/900 | 4.7·10−2/9.4·10−2 | |
| La5.5WO11.25-δ:La0.87Sr0.13CrO3-δ (50:50 vol.%) | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 700 | 5.5·10−3 | |
| BaCe0.80Eu0.20O3-δ:Ce0.80Eu0.20O2-δ (50:50 vol.%) | H2, CH4, H2O, CO, CO2 – He | 900 | <7.0·10−2 | |
| BaCe0.80Y0.20O3-δ:Ce0.80Y0.20O2-δ (50:50 wt.%) | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 1.1·10−2 | |
| BaCe0.65Zr0.20Y0.15O3-δ:Ce0.85Gd0.15O2-δ (50:50 vol.%) | wet 50% H2 in He – wet Ar | 755 | 1.76·10−2 | |
| BaCe0.20Zr0.70Y0.10O3-δ:Sr0.95Ti0.90Ni0.10O3-δ (50:50 vol.%) | 9% H2 in He – dry Ar | 800 | 1.1·10−3 | |
| SrZrO3:SrFeO3 (80:20 vol.%) | H2 in He – wet Ar | 900 | 4.8·10−3 | |
Figure 1XRD diffraction patterns of BCEO (bottom); CYO (middle) synthesized by solid-state reaction at 1400 °C for 6 and 26 h; and the BCEO:CYO (top) composite pattern sintered for 10 h at 1600 °C.
Rietveld refinement results from the XRD patterns of BCEO and CYO synthesized via the conventional solid-state route at 1400 °C during 6 h and 20 h (in total 26 h), and of BCEO:CYO dual-phase pellet (50:50 vol.%) sintered at 1600 °C for 10 h. For reference, the lattice parameters of pure BaCeO3 are a = 8.776(1) Å, b = 6.234(1) Å, c = 6.214(1) Å.
| Nominal starting compounds | Phase composition | Space group | Lattice parameter(s), (Å) | Phase wt. % | Phase Dth (g/cm3) | Rwp, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BaCe0.8Eu0.2O2.9 1400 °C/6 h | BaCe0.8Eu0.2O2.9 tetragonal | P-42m | a = 4.388 (1) c = 4.465 (1) | 86 | 6.30 | 6.7 |
| BaCe0.8Eu0.2O2.9 orthorhombic | Pmcn | a = 6.245 (1) b = 8.770 (1) c = 6.272 (1) | 14 | 6.31 | ||
| BaCe0.8Eu0.2O2.9 1400 °C/26 h | BaCe0.8Eu0.2O2.9 orthorhombic | Pmcn | a = 6.229 b = 8.782 c = 6.257 (1) | 100 | 6.35 | 6.6 |
| Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 1400 °C/6 h | Ce0.9Y0.1O1.95 cubic | Fm-3m | a = 5.411(1) | 45 | 6.93 | 5.3 |
| Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 cubic | Fm-3m | a = 5.401(1) | 55 | 6.75 | ||
| Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 1400 °C/26 h | Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 cubic | Fm-3m | a = 5.405(1) | 100 | 6.8 | 5.9 |
| BaCe0.8Eu0.2O2.9: Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 1600 °C/10 h | BaCe1-xEuxO3-δ orthorhombic | Pmcn | a = 8.786(1) b = 6.245(1) c = 6.210(1) | 46 | 6.34 | 5.4 |
| Ce0.695Y0.2Eu0.105O2-δ cubic | Fm-3m | a = 5.411(1) | 54 | 6.77 |
Figure 2(a,b) SEM, (c–e) BSE-SEM and (f) EDS linescan analysis of the fractured cross-section of the BCEO:CYO membrane sintered at 1600 °C.
Figure 3(a) Overview TEM image acquired from BCEO:CYO sample sintered at 1600 °C for 10 h; (b)-(c) shows the grain contrast dependence with distinct sample orientation (tilt); (d) Overview STEM-HAADF acquired from BCEO:CYO samples together with corresponding elemental EDX areal maps; (e) integrated EDX spectrum from the CYO and BCEO grains; and (f) High-resolution STEM-HAADF images acquired from CYO (Ce-Y-Eu-O) grain (left column) and BCEO (Ba-Ce-O) grain (right column) in the BCEO:CYO dual phase sample utilizing different crystallographic projections.
Figure 4Total conductivity as a function of inverse temperature measured under four different reducing atmospheres: 5 vol.% H2 in He and 5 vol.% D2 in He both dry and moist (H2 and D2 humidified with H2O and D2O at room temperature, respectively) for (a) BCEO, (b) CYO and (c) BCEO:CYO composite.
Figure 5Total conductivity as a function of pO2 under wet reducing atmospheres at four different temperatures for (a) BCEO, (b) CYO and (c) BCEO:CYO.
Figure 6(a) Representation of configurations for membrane testing; (b) H2 flow as a function of temperature in the three configurations A, B and C with different hydration degree, feed stream 50% H2 in He; and (c,d) H2 flow as a function of temperature for different pH2 feeding in configuration B and C.
Figure 7(a) H2 flows obtained at 700 °C in configurations B and C for pH2O(sweep) = 0.042 atm and pH2O(sweep) = 0.0094 atm. (b,c) H2 flow variation produced by the step-change from C to B to A with (b) pH2O (sweep) = 0.042 atm and (c) pH2O(sweep) = 0.0094 atm at 700 °C feeding 50 vol.% H2.
Figure 8(a) H2 flow as a function of time by using 15 vol.% CO2 in Ar as sweep gas and 50 vol.% H2 in He as feed gas at 700 °C. Both sides of the membrane were humidified (configuration B). (b) TG measurements of BCEO, CYO and BCEO:CYO under 5 vol.% CO2 in Ar.
Figure 9(a) Diffraction patterns for BCEO:CYO dual phase ceramic samples: as-sintered sample (BP-1600/10 h) and sample after H2-permeation tests (feed side AP-F and sweep sides AP-S). Peak positions corresponding to Pt traces from the catalytic layer are denoted by symbol (♦). As a reference (bottom): peak positions and their intensities for BaCeO3 and Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9. (b) SEM and (c,d) BSE-SEM micrographs and (e) EDS linescan analysis of the fractured cross-section of the BCEO:CYO membrane after the permeation measurements.