Literature DB >> 27811988

Association of EGFR Exon 19 Deletion and EGFR-TKI Treatment Duration with Frequency of T790M Mutation in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer Patients.

Norikazu Matsuo1, Koichi Azuma1, Kazuko Sakai2, Satoshi Hattori3, Akihiko Kawahara4, Hidenobu Ishii1, Takaaki Tokito1, Takashi Kinoshita1, Kazuhiko Yamada1, Kazuto Nishio3, Tomoaki Hoshino1.   

Abstract

The most common event responsible for resistance to first- and second-generation (1st and 2nd) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is acquisition of T790M mutation. We examined whether T790M is related to clinicopathologic or prognostic factors in patients with relapse of EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs. We retrospectively reviewed the T790M status and clinical characteristics of 73 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who had been treated with EGFR-TKIs and undergone rebiopsy at Kurume University Hospital between March 2005 and December 2015. T790M mutation was more frequent in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation (63%, 26/41) than in those with L858R mutation (38%, 12/32) (p = 0.035). The median total duration of 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly longer in patients with T790M mutation than in those without (15.3 months vs 8.1 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the type of EGFR mutation and the total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment were significantly associated with T790M prevalence. Patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation who receive long-term EGFR-TKI therapy show a high prevalence of T790M mutation. The present data are potentially important for clinical decision-making in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27811988      PMCID: PMC5095551          DOI: 10.1038/srep36458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Prospective clinical trials of first- or second-generation (1st or 2nd) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations have demonstrated remarkable response rates of approximately 70%1234567. Although most NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations benefit from treatment with 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs, the clinical efficacy differs among individuals, and resistance eventually develops within 9–14 months. Several mechanisms of resistance have been identified, including a second point mutation site where methionine is substituted for threonine at position 790 (T790M) in EGFR, amplification of the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition factor receptor (MET), mutation of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA), transformation to small cell lung cancer, loss of Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog Deleted from Chromosome 10 (PTEN), high expression of hepatocyte growth factor, activation of the fatty acid synthase /NF- k B pathway, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and loss or splice variants of BIM8. Of these mechanisms, T790M mutation is the most common and accounts for approximately half of all acquired resistance to 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs910. Recently, third-generation (3rd) EGFR-TKIs, such as Osimertinib and Rociletinib, have been shown to exert a remarkable effect against T790M resistance mutation-positive NSCLC111213. T790M mutation is an important predictive marker for 3rd EGFR-TKIs; therefore, determining the clinicopathologic characteristics of T790M-harboring NSCLC showing relapse after EGFR-TKI therapy is of high clinical relevance. Here we evaluated whether T790M mutation is related to clinicopathologic or prognostic factors in patients with relapse of EGFR-mutant NSCLC after treatment with EGFR-TKIs.

Results

Patient characteristics

In the period from March 2005 to December 2015, we identified 193 patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC who developed resistance to initial 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs treatment. Of these patients, 105 (54%) underwent re-biopsy. Adequate histological specimens were available for 73 of these patients, who were enrolled in the study; 38 (52%) of them had T790M mutation and 35 (48%) did not. All patients were tested for EGFR mutation in pre-EGFR-TKI specimens. Forty-one patients had exon 19 deletion mutation, whereas 32 patients had L858R mutation. Exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation are mutually exclusive (Supplementary Table S1). At the time of rebiopsy, all patients had been previously treated with gefitinib (n = 58), erlotinib (n = 12), or afatinib (n = 3) as the initial EGFR-TKI. Specifically, 41 (56%), 18 (25%), 12 (16%), and 2 (3%) patients received initial EGFR-TKI as the first, second, third and fourth lines of treatment, respectively. Following relapse after initial EGFR-TKI treatment, 31 patients continued to receive the initial EGFR-TKI treatment at the physician’s discretion. Table 1 shows data for the association between T790M prevalence and rebiopsy site. There were no significant differences between rebiopsy sites and presence of T790M mtation (p = 0.991). Relevant patient characteristics in relation to presence of T790M mutation are summarized in Table 2. T790M mutation was present more frequently in patients with exon 19 deletion mutation (63%, 26 of 41) than in those with L858R mutation (38%, 12 of 32) (p = 0.035), in patients with brain metastasis at diagnosis (82%, 14 of 17) than in those without (43%, 24 of 56) (p = 0.005), and in patients who received EGFR-TKI treatment for at least 10 months in total (71%, 32 of 45) than in those who did not (21%, 6 of 28) (p < 0.001). Other characteristics had no statistical association with the detection of T790M mutation.
Table 1

Details of rebiopsy sites, procedures and T790M mutation prevalence.

SpecimenT790M prevalencep
Lung3751% (19/37)0.987
Pleural effusion1644% (7/16) 
Lymph node560% (3/5) 
Cerebrospinal fluid450% (2/4) 
Pericardial effusion250% (1/2) 
Ascites367% (2/3) 
Skin367% (2/3) 
Liver367% (2/3) 
Table 2

Patient characteristics and frequency of T790M mutation.

VariablesNoPatients with T790M, No. (%)P
Age, years
 Median67  
 Range48–82  
Gender  0.782
 Male169 (56) 
 Female5729 (51) 
Histology  NS
 Adeno7237 (51) 
 Squamous11 (100) 
Smoking status  0.408
 Never smoker5631 (55) 
 Smoker177 (41) 
EGFR mutation  0.035
 Exon 19 deletion4126 (63) 
 L858R3212 (38) 
Stage  0.459
 Initially advanced5329 (55) 
 Recurrent209 (45) 
Rebiopsy sites  0.699
 Primary site3318 (55) 
 Metastasis site4020 (50) 
Brain metastasis at diagnosis  0.005
 With1714 (82) 
 Without5624 (43) 
Initial EGFR-TKI  0.736
 Gefitinib5830 (52) 
 Erlotinib127 (58) 
 Afatinib31 (33) 
Line of initial EGFR-TKI  0.434
 First4123 (56) 
 Second or later3215 (47) 
Interval between prior EGFR-TKI and rebiopsy  0.573
 <4 m5329 (54) 
 ≧4 m209 (45) 
Immediate prior treatment  0.363
 EGFR-TKI6033 (55) 
 Chemotherapy135 (38) 
Total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment  <0.001
 <10 months286 (21) 
 ≧10 months4532 (71) 
T790M analysis  0.347
 Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test2913 (45) 
 Digital PCR4425 (57) 

Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Efficacy of initial EGFR-TKI treatment in relation to presence of T790M mutation

The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were significantly higher in the group positive for T790M mutation than in the negative group (ORR: 94.7% vs 60%, p = 0.001, respectively; DCR: 97.4% vs 71.4%, p = 0.002, respectively). The median PFS after initial EGFR-TKI treatment was longer in the T790M mutation-positive group (13.6 months, 95% CI: 9.2–15.8) than in the negative group (7 months, 95% CI: 3.7–8.5) (p = 0.037). There was no significant difference in OS between patients with T790M mutation (45.2 months; 95% CI, 31.4–51.1) and those without (40.1 months; 95% CI, 21.7–45.8) (p = 0.278) (Fig. 1). The median total duration of 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with T790M mutation was 15.3 months, which was significantly longer than that (8.1 months) in patients without T790M mutation (p < 0.001). The last follow-up point was December 2015, and the median follow-up period after initial treatment was 29.7 months.
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier estimates of (a) progression-free survival after initial EGFR-TKI therapy and (b) overall survival in patients with and without T790M mutation.

Multivariate analysis of T790M mutation prevalence

Multivariate analysis of T790M mutation prevalence was performed on selected variables (Table 3). The type of EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion mutation versus L858R point mutation, p = 0.011, OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.05–0.71) and total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment (>10 months versus <10 months, p < 0.001, OR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.02–0.28) were significantly associated with the presence of T790M mutation in the multivariate logistic regression models.
Table 3

Multivariate analysis of T790M mutation prevalence.

VariablePOR (95% CI)
Sex (female/male)0.7720.84 (0.20–3.37)
EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion/L858R)0.0110.21 (0.05–0.71)
Rebiopsy site (primary site/metastasis site)0.7580.83 (0.26–2.66)
Total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment (10 mo≤/<10 mo)<0.0010.09 (0.02–0.28)
Interval between EGFR-TKI failure and rebiopsy (<4 mo/≥4 mo)0.1700.39 (0.08–1.51)

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; mo, months.

Discussion

Recently, it has become clear that T790M mutation-positive NSCLC shows a high rate of response (approximately 60%) to 3rd EGFR-TKIs111213. Therefore, it is important to determine the characteristics of NSCLCs harboring T790M mutation showing relapse after treatment with 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs, as these could have a great impact on treatment strategy. In the present study, we examined the relationship between T790M mutation and clinicopathologic or prognostic factors in patients showing relapse of EGFR-mutant NSCLC after 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI therapy, and our data showed that a high proportion of patients with EGFR deletion 19 mutation who received long-term 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI therapy demonstrated a high prevalence of T790M mutation. Exposure to 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs is likely to play an important role in the development of T790M mutation at the time of acquired resistance to 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs. In a preclinical study, Chmielecki et al. demonstrated that T790M-positive cells were selected after long-term exposure to 1st EGFR-TKIs14. Several other studies have shown that T790M-positive cells undergo selection and enrichment during EGFR-TKI treatment1516. Kuiper et al. reported that the median PFS in a T790M-positive population was 14.2 months, being significantly longer than that (11.1 months) in a T790M-negative population17. We also found that PFS after initial EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly higher in the T790M-positive group than in the negative group. These results indicate that long-term exposure to 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs might be a predictor of T790M mutation, suggesting that larger studies are warranted to confirm this possibility. In this study, we observed only the major mutations, i.e. exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation, and found that the T790M positivity rate was significantly higher in patients with exon 19 deletion than in those with L858R mutation. Previous studies have reported similar trends, but no studies except for the study by Nosaki et al. have reported a statistically significant association18. Unlike our study, the previous studies – except for that by Nosaki et al. – observed some minor mutations and included them in their statistical tests for association. Since the frequencies of such minor mutations were small, their inclusion might have led to loss in power in statistical tests. Therefore, we have reanalyzed the four studies17192021 using Fisher’s exact test, focusing on the major mutations, and found that Sun et al. and Hata et al. also demonstrated a similar trend with statistical significance. Nosaki et al. also demonstrated that the T790M mutation was induced more frequently in patients with an exon 19 deletion mutation (55.6%) than in those with an L858R mutation (43.0%) (P = 0.05) (Supplementary Table S2). Collectively, T790M mutation was more frequent in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation than in those with L858R mutation. Recently it was reported that patients with exon 19 deletion mutation showed a better response to 2nd EGFR-TKI than patients with L858R mutation22. This difference might be attributable to the biological effects of EGFR exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation23. It was noteworthy that our study did not demonstrate any significant difference in the median PFS after initial EGFR-TKI therapy and OS between patients with these two types of mutation (Supplementary Fig. S1). The median total duration of 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI treatment also did not differ significantly between the EGFR exon 19 deletion (13.5 months) and L858R mutation (11.2 months) groups (p = 0.367). Therefore, we favor the interpretation that there is no correlation between the type of EGFR mutation and the duration of 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI treatment. Our present results suggest that EGFR exon 19 deletion mutants of NSCLC have a distinct biological phenotype that makes acquisition of T790M mutation more likely upon exposure to 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKIs. However, this hypothesis will require rigorous testing by appropriately designed basic studies. To analyze the clinical effect of the type of EGFR mutation and T790M mutation, we divided the patients into four groups in terms of their type of EGFR mutation and positive or negative T790 mutation. The median PFS was 12.5 months in the exon 19 deletion/T790M+ group, 13.8 months in the L858R/T790M+ group, 7.0 months in the exon 19 deletion/T790M- group, and 7.1 months in the L858R/T790M- group (p = 0.212). The corresponding median OS values were 43.1, 59.8, 40.9, and 42.4 months, respectively (p = 0.465). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between these groups. It is noteworthy that our patients did not receive any third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Given the high efficacy of third-generation EGFR-TKIs against T790M resistance111213, treatment with 3rd EGFR-TKIs may have contributed to improving the clinical outcomes of patients in who had T790M positivity. The timing of 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI withdrawal in NSCLC patients who acquire resistance remains controversial. The IMPRESS study demonstrated no benefit of continued 1st EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy after RECIST progression in comparison to chemotherapy alone24. However, in patients with isolated disease progression after development of resistance to 1st EGFR-TKI, continuation of 1st EGFR-TKI in combination with local therapy is feasible, and subsequent treatment can be postponed252627. In our present study, patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation who received long-term treatment with 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI demonstrated a high prevalence of T790M mutation. These results suggesting that continuation of 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI therapy after RECIST progression seems to be an acceptable option under certain circumstances. This retrospective study had several limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small. Second, determination of T790M mutation in tumor samples was generally performed using two methods, although there was no significant difference in the incidence of T790M mutation between the methods. Third, the retrospective nature of the study did not allow for a standardized measure of PFS. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that NSCLC patients with T790M mutation showing disease progression after EGFR-TKI therapy are more likely to have been exposed to EGFR-TKI for a longer period and to harbor EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation. These data could be of potential importance for treatment decision-making after 1st or 2nd EGFR-TKI progression. Further prospective trials and basic research will be needed to confirm our findings.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Our study cohort comprised patients with pathologically confirmed advanced (stage IIIB or IV) or recurrent EGFR mutant NSCLC who had been treated with 1st EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib and erlotinib) or 2nd EGFR-TKI (afatinib) and undergone rebiopsy at Kurume University Hospital between March 2005 and December 2015. Using medical records, we retrospectively reviewed the patientsEGFR T790M mutation status and clinical characteristics. The present study was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kurume University Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all patients who participated in the study.

Tumor sampling and T790M mutation analysis

We examined formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections or fresh frozen samples of tumors after acquisition of resistance to EGFR-TKI treatment. Mutational analysis of T790M mutation was performed by the digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) using the QX100 Droplet Digital PCR System in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), or the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test (Roche Molecular Systems). The primers and probes for T790M mutation were purchased from Bio-Rad. The cutoff value for T790M mutation was set at 3.0 copies on the basis of data from 10 samples of normal DNA.

Statistical analysis

The associations between T790M mutation and clinical characteristics were analyzed using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Objective tumor responses were evaluated in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria28. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the period from the date of initiation of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment to the date of disease progression or death due to any cause, and overall survival (OS) was measured from initiation of treatment or initial diagnosis until the date of death or last follow-up. The total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment was defined as that between diagnosis and rebiopsy. Survival curves were derived using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression models were prepared to estimate the prevalence of T790M mutation in patients with progression of EGFR-mutant NSCLC after treatment with EGFR-TKIs. All variables with p values of < 0.05 were included in the logistic regression models. All tests were two-sided, and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. All of the statistical analyses were conducted using JMP version 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) or Graph Pad Prism version 6.07 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA; www.graphpad.com).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Matsuo, N. et al. Association of EGFR Exon 19 Deletion and EGFR-TKI Treatment Duration with Frequency of T790M Mutation in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer Patients. Sci. Rep. 6, 36458; doi: 10.1038/srep36458 (2016). Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  28 in total

1.  Gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on first-line gefitinib (IMPRESS): a phase 3 randomised trial.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Soria; Yi-Long Wu; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Sang-We Kim; Jin-Ji Yang; Myung-Ju Ahn; Jie Wang; James Chih-Hsin Yang; You Lu; Shinji Atagi; Santiago Ponce; Dae Ho Lee; Yunpeng Liu; Kiyotaka Yoh; Jian-Ying Zhou; Xiaojin Shi; Alan Webster; Haiyi Jiang; Tony S K Mok
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Optimization of dosing for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with evolutionary cancer modeling.

Authors:  Juliann Chmielecki; Jasmine Foo; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Katherine Hutchinson; Kadoaki Ohashi; Romel Somwar; Lu Wang; Katherine R Amato; Maria Arcila; Martin L Sos; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; Elisa de Stanchina; Michelle S Ginsberg; Roman K Thomas; Mark G Kris; Akira Inoue; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; Franziska Michor; William Pao
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS).

Authors:  Masahiro Fukuoka; Yi-Long Wu; Sumitra Thongprasert; Patrapim Sunpaweravong; Swan-Swan Leong; Virote Sriuranpong; Tsu-Yi Chao; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Da-Tong Chu; Nagahiro Saijo; Emma L Duffield; Yuri Rukazenkov; Georgina Speake; Haiyi Jiang; Alison A Armour; Ka-Fai To; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Tony S K Mok
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR.

Authors:  Makoto Maemondo; Akira Inoue; Kunihiko Kobayashi; Shunichi Sugawara; Satoshi Oizumi; Hiroshi Isobe; Akihiko Gemma; Masao Harada; Hirohisa Yoshizawa; Ichiro Kinoshita; Yuka Fujita; Shoji Okinaga; Haruto Hirano; Kozo Yoshimori; Toshiyuki Harada; Takashi Ogura; Masahiro Ando; Hitoshi Miyazawa; Tomoaki Tanaka; Yasuo Saijo; Koichi Hagiwara; Satoshi Morita; Toshihiro Nukiwa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Rociletinib in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; Jean-Charles Soria; Jonathan W Goldman; Heather A Wakelee; Shirish M Gadgeel; Andrea Varga; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Benjamin J Solomon; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Dara L Aisner; Robert C Doebele; Cathy Galasso; Edward B Garon; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Logan; Joel W Neal; Melody A Mendenhall; Suzanne Nichols; Zofia Piotrowska; Antoinette J Wozniak; Mitch Raponi; Chris A Karlovich; Sarah Jaw-Tsai; Jeffrey Isaacson; Darrin Despain; Shannon L Matheny; Lindsey Rolfe; Andrew R Allen; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Continuous administration of EGFR-TKIs following radiotherapy after disease progression in bone lesions for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Minehiko Inomata; Takehito Shukuya; Toshiaki Takahashi; Akira Ono; Yukiko Nakamura; Asuka Tsuya; Hirotsugu Kenmotsu; Tateaki Naito; Haruyasu Murakami; Hideyuki Harada; Masahiro Endo; Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Local ablative therapy of oligoprogressive disease prolongs disease control by tyrosine kinase inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Weickhardt; Benjamin Scheier; Joseph Malachy Burke; Gregory Gan; Xian Lu; Paul A Bunn; Dara L Aisner; Laurie E Gaspar; Brian D Kavanagh; Robert C Doebele; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Plasma EGFR T790M ctDNA status is associated with clinical outcome in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance.

Authors:  D Zheng; X Ye; M Z Zhang; Y Sun; J Y Wang; J Ni; H P Zhang; L Zhang; J Luo; J Zhang; L Tang; B Su; G Chen; G Zhu; Y Gu; J F Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Highly sensitive and quantitative evaluation of the EGFR T790M mutation by nanofluidic digital PCR.

Authors:  Eiji Iwama; Koichi Takayama; Taishi Harada; Isamu Okamoto; Fumihiko Ookubo; Junji Kishimoto; Eishi Baba; Yoshinao Oda; Yoichi Nakanishi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-08-21
View more
  38 in total

1.  Machine learning-based algorithm demonstrates differences in del19 and L858R EGFR subgroups in non-small cell lung cancer: a single center experience.

Authors:  Ullas Batra; Shrinidhi Nathany; Mansi Sharma; Anurag Mehta; Surender Dhanda; Joslia T Jose
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Prognostic impact of pretreatment T790M mutation on outcomes for patients with resected, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiya Matsumoto; Tomoya Kawaguchi; Masaru Watanabe; Shun-Ichi Isa; Masahiko Ando; Akihiro Tamiya; Akihito Kubo; Chiyoe Kitagawa; Naoki Yoshimoto; Yasuhiro Koh
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Comparison of T790M Acquisition After Treatment With First- and Second-Generation Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Po-Chun Hsieh; Yao-Kuang Wu; Chun-Yao Huang; Mei-Chen Yang; Chan-Yen Kuo; I-Shiang Tzeng; Chou-Chin Lan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Strategies to overcome acquired resistance to EGFR TKI in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J Gao; H-R Li; C Jin; J-H Jiang; J-Y Ding
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Association Of Initial Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment And EGFR Exon 19 Deletion With Frequency Of The T790M Mutation In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Resistance To First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Wen Gao; Jing He; Shi-Dai Jin; Jing Xu; Tong-Fu Yu; Wei Wang; Quan Zhu; Hui Dai; Hao Wu; Yi-Qian Liu; Yong-Qian Shu; Ren-Hua Guo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The alteration of T790M between 19 del and L858R in NSCLC in the course of EGFR-TKIs therapy: a literature-based pooled analysis.

Authors:  Hengrui Liang; Zhenkui Pan; Wei Wang; Chengye Guo; Difei Chen; Jianrong Zhang; Yiyin Zhang; Shiyan Tang; Jianxing He; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  MicroRNA-18a-5p functions as an oncogene by directly targeting IRF2 in lung cancer.

Authors:  Chen Liang; Xing Zhang; Hui-Min Wang; Xiao-Min Liu; Xin-Ju Zhang; Bo Zheng; Guang-Ren Qian; Zhong-Liang Ma
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 8.469

8.  Gene Expression Signature Differentiates Histology But Not Progression Status of Early-Stage NSCLC.

Authors:  Radoslaw Charkiewicz; Jacek Niklinski; Jürgen Claesen; Anetta Sulewska; Miroslaw Kozlowski; Anna Michalska-Falkowska; Joanna Reszec; Marcin Moniuszko; Wojciech Naumnik; Wieslawa Niklinska
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation as a prognostic factor in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients that acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Guangzhi Ma; Jing Zhang; Hai Jiang; Nannan Zhang; Liyuan Yin; Wen Li; Qinghua Zhou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-29

10.  Usefulness of Bronchoscopic Rebiopsy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Acquired Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor.

Authors:  Eun Kyong Goag; Jung Mo Lee; Kyung Soo Chung; Song Yee Kim; Ah Young Leem; Joo Han Song; Ji Ye Jung; Moo Suk Park; Yoon Soo Chang; Young Sam Kim; Joon Chang; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.