OBJECTIVE: Despite cognitive tests have been validated in multiple sclerosis (MS), a neuropsychological evaluation is not implemented in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scoring. METHODS: We used the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) and orientation tests (OTs) to measure the cerebral functional system (CFS) score and to evaluate its impact on the EDSS. We compared EDSS calculated as usual (Native-EDSS) and after the use of the BICAMS and OT (NPS-EDSS). RESULTS: We tested 604 MS patients with BICAMS, OTs, and EDSS. In all, 384 patients (63.6%) had at least one altered test at the BICAMS. Older age, lower education, higher Native-EDSS, and male gender were independently associated with at least one impaired BICAMS test. Native-EDSS was different from NPS-EDSS (-0.112; p < 0.001) in 99 patients (16%). When considering patients with a Native-EDSS ⩽ 4.0, the proportion of miscalculated EDSS was 25%. CONCLUSION: The use of brief neuropsychological tests leads to a more accurate CFS assessment in two-thirds of MS patients, and a more accurate EDSS calculation in 25% of patients with a score ⩽4.0. This may help clinicians to better recognize cognitive impairment in everyday clinical practice, especially in the case of isolated cognitive worsening.
OBJECTIVE: Despite cognitive tests have been validated in multiple sclerosis (MS), a neuropsychological evaluation is not implemented in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scoring. METHODS: We used the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) and orientation tests (OTs) to measure the cerebral functional system (CFS) score and to evaluate its impact on the EDSS. We compared EDSS calculated as usual (Native-EDSS) and after the use of the BICAMS and OT (NPS-EDSS). RESULTS: We tested 604 MSpatients with BICAMS, OTs, and EDSS. In all, 384 patients (63.6%) had at least one altered test at the BICAMS. Older age, lower education, higher Native-EDSS, and male gender were independently associated with at least one impaired BICAMS test. Native-EDSS was different from NPS-EDSS (-0.112; p < 0.001) in 99 patients (16%). When considering patients with a Native-EDSS ⩽ 4.0, the proportion of miscalculated EDSS was 25%. CONCLUSION: The use of brief neuropsychological tests leads to a more accurate CFS assessment in two-thirds of MSpatients, and a more accurate EDSS calculation in 25% of patients with a score ⩽4.0. This may help clinicians to better recognize cognitive impairment in everyday clinical practice, especially in the case of isolated cognitive worsening.
Authors: Antonio Carotenuto; Teresa Costabile; Mario De Lucia; Marcello Moccia; Fabrizia Falco; Martina Petruzzo; Marcello De Angelis; Cinzia Valeria Russo; Francesco Saccà; Roberta Lanzillo; Vincenzo Brescia Morra Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Ricardo N Alonso; Maria B Eizaguirre; Berenice Silva; Maria C Pita; Cecilia Yastremiz; Sandra Vanotti; Fernando Cáceres; Orlando Garcea Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2020 Jan-Feb
Authors: Marcello De Angelis; Luigi Lavorgna; Antonio Carotenuto; Martina Petruzzo; Roberta Lanzillo; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Marcello Moccia Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 4.241