| Literature DB >> 27811019 |
Daniel Fuerst1,2, Christine Neuchel1,2, Dietger Niederwieser3, Donald Bunjes4, Martin Gramatzki5, Eva Wagner6, Gerald Wulf7, Bertram Glass8, Michael Pfreundschuh9, Hermann Einsele10, Renate Arnold11, Gernot Stuhler12, Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart13, Sebastian Freitag14, Jochen Casper15, Martin Kaufmann16, Mohammed Wattad17, Bernd Hertenstein18, Stefan Klein19, Mark Ringhoffer20, Daphne Mytilineos2, Chrysanthi Tsamadou1,2, Carlheinz Mueller21,22, Hubert Schrezenmeier1,2, Joannis Mytilineos1,2,22.
Abstract
Major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MICA) is a highly polymorphic ligand of the activating NKG2D receptor on natural killer (NK) cells, γδ-T cells, and NKT cells. MICA incompatibilities have been associated with an increased graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence, and the MICA-129 (met/val) dimorphism has been shown to influence NKG2D signaling in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (uHSCT). We investigated the effect of MICA matching on survival after uHSCT. We sequenced 2172 patients and their respective donors for MICA. All patients and donors were high-resolution HLA-typed and matched for 10/10 (n = 1379), 9/10 (n = 636), or 8/10 (n = 157) HLA alleles. Within each HLA match group, cases matched and mismatched for MICA and MICA-129 were analyzed for the end points overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse-incidence (RI), and GVHD. Mismatches at the MICA locus as well as MICA-129 increased with the number of HLA mismatches (MICA mismatched 10/10, 9.2% [n = 127]; 9/10, 22.3% [n = 142]; 8/10, 38.2% [n = 60]; MICA-129 mismatched 10/10, 3.9% [n = 54]; 9/10, 10.2% [n = 65]; 8/10, 17.2% [n = 27]). Adverse OS was observed in the 10/10 match group if MICA-129 was mismatched (10/10, hazard ratio [HR], 1.77; confidence interval [CI], 1.22-2.57; P = .003). MICA-129 mismatches correlated with a significantly worse outcome for DFS in the 10/10 HLA match group (HR, 1.77; CI, 1.26-2.50; P = .001). Higher rates of aGVHD were seen in MICA-129 mismatched cases. Our results indicate that MICA-129 matching is relevant in uHSCT. Prospective typing of patients and donors in unrelated donor search may identify mismatches for MICA-129, and compatible donor selection may improve outcome for this small but high-risk subgroup.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27811019 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-716357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113