Literature DB >> 27810635

The effectiveness of family group conferencing in youth care: A meta-analysis.

Sharon Dijkstra1, Hanneke E Creemers2, Jessica J Asscher3, Maja Deković4, Geert Jan J M Stams5.   

Abstract

A meta-analytic study, involving 14 controlled studies (N=88495 participants), was conducted to examine the effectiveness of Family Group Conferencing (FGC) in youth care. Child safety (in terms of reports of child maltreatment and out-of-home placement) and involvement of youth care were included as outcome variables; study, sample and intervention characteristics were included as moderators. Overall, FGC did not significantly reduce child maltreatment, out-of-home placements, and involvement of youth care. Study and sample characteristics moderated the effectiveness of FGC. Retrospective studies found FGC to be more effective than regular care in reducing the recurrence of maltreatment and decreasing the number and length of out-of-home placements, whereas prospective studies found FGC to be not more effective than regular care. Moreover, FGC was found to increase the number and length of out-of-home placements for families with older children and minority groups. The findings of this study showed that robust research proving effectiveness of FGC is limited. It is, therefore, crucial for the safety and protection of children in youth care that, before broadly implementing this decision making model in youth care, more robust studies examining the effectiveness of FGC be conducted. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child maltreatment; Effectiveness; Family group conferencing; Involvement of youth care; Meta-analysis; Out-of-home placement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27810635     DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Abuse Negl        ISSN: 0145-2134


  5 in total

1.  Young female offenders and the New Zealand Youth Justice System: the need for a gender-specific response.

Authors:  Charlotte Best; Julia Ioane; Ian Lambie
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2021-04-07

2.  Cost-effectiveness of Family Group Conferencing in child welfare: a controlled study.

Authors:  Sharon Dijkstra; Hanneke E Creemers; Francisca J A van Steensel; Maja Deković; Geert Jan J M Stams; Jessica J Asscher
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Family group decision-making interventions in adult healthcare and welfare: a systematic literature review of its key elements and effectiveness.

Authors:  Chantal F Hillebregt; Eline W M Scholten; Marcel W M Post; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Marjolijn Ketelaar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Mapping the evidence about what works to safely reduce the entry of children and young people into statutory care: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Sarah L Brand; Fiona Morgan; Lorna Stabler; Alison Lesley Weightman; Simone Willis; Lydia Searchfield; Ulugbek Nurmatov; Alison Mary Kemp; Ruth Turley; Jonathan Scourfield; Donald Forrester; Rhiannon E Evans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Annual Research Review: Umbrella synthesis of meta-analyses on child maltreatment antecedents and interventions: differential susceptibility perspective on risk and resilience.

Authors:  Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Barry Coughlan; Sophie Reijman
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 8.265

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.