Literature DB >> 27810466

Proposed primary endpoints for use in clinical trials that compare treatment options for bloodstream infection in adults: a consensus definition.

P N A Harris1, J F McNamara2, D C Lye3, J S Davis4, L Bernard5, A C Cheng6, Y Doi7, V G Fowler8, K S Kaye9, L Leibovici10, J Lipman11, M J Llewelyn12, S Munoz-Price13, M Paul14, A Y Peleg15, J Rodríguez-Baño16, B A Rogers17, H Seifert18, V Thamlikitkul19, G Thwaites20, S Y C Tong21, J Turnidge22, R Utili23, S A R Webb24, D L Paterson25.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define standardized endpoints to aid the design of trials that compare antibiotic therapies for bloodstream infections (BSI).
METHODS: Prospective studies, randomized trials or registered protocols comparing antibiotic therapies for BSI, published from 2005 to 2016, were reviewed. Consensus endpoints for BSI studies were defined using a modified Delphi process.
RESULTS: Different primary and secondary endpoints were defined for pilot (small-scale studies designed to evaluate protocol design, feasibility and implementation) and definitive trials (larger-scale studies designed to test hypotheses and influence clinical practice), as well as for Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative BSI. For pilot studies of S. aureus BSI, a primary outcome of success at day 7 was defined by: survival, resolution of fever, stable/improved Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and clearance of blood cultures, with no microbiologically confirmed failure up to 90 days. For definitive S. aureus BSI studies, a primary outcome of success at 90 days was defined by survival and no microbiologically confirmed failure. For pilot studies of Gram-negative BSI, a primary outcome of success at day 7 was defined by: survival, resolution of fever and symptoms related to BSI source, stable or improved SOFA score and negative blood cultures. For definitive Gram-negative BSI studies, a primary outcome of survival at 90 days supported by a secondary outcome of success at day 7 (as previously defined) was agreed.
CONCLUSIONS: These endpoints provide a framework to aid future trial design. Further work will be required to validate these endpoints with respect to patient-centred clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic therapy; Bacteraemia; Bacterial infections; Clinical trials; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27810466     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  15 in total

1.  Fluoroquinolone versus Beta-Lactam Oral Step-Down Therapy for Uncomplicated Streptococcal Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Kellie Arensman; Maureen Shields; Maya Beganovic; Jessica L Miller; Erik LaChance; Morgan Anderson; Jennifer Dela-Pena
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Appropriate endpoints for evaluation of new antibiotic therapies for severe infections: a perspective from COMBACTE's STAT-Net.

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit; Marlieke E A de Kraker; Harriet Sommer; Emmanuel Weiss; Esther Bettiol; Martin Wolkewitz; Stavros Nikolakopoulos; David Wilson; Stephan Harbarth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Benefit of Echocardiography in Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia at Low Risk of Endocarditis.

Authors:  George S Heriot; Steven Y C Tong; Allen C Cheng; Danny Liew
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Catheter-related bloodstream infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci: are antibiotics necessary if the catheter is removed?

Authors:  Ursula Patricia Hebeisen; Andrew Atkinson; Jonas Marschall; Niccolò Buetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.887

5.  Oral Fluoroquinolone or Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. ß-lactams as Step-Down Therapy for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chitra Punjabi; Vivian Tien; Lina Meng; Stan Deresinski; Marisa Holubar
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.835

6.  Development of quality indicators for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Authors:  Jaap Ten Oever; Joëll L Jansen; Thomas W van der Vaart; Jeroen A Schouten; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Annelies Verbon
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  IFNL3 rs12980275 Polymorphism Predicts Septic Shock-Related Death in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Felipe Pérez-García; Maria Ángeles Jiménez-Sousa; Susana Soria; Pablo Jorge-Monjas; Amanda Fernández-Rodríguez; Esther Gómez-Sánchez; María Heredia-Rodríguez; Estefanía Gómez-Pesquera; Pedro Martínez-Paz; Eduardo Tamayo; Salvador Resino
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-14

8.  Prognostic Utility of the New Definition of Difficult-to-Treat Resistance Among Patients With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Maddalena Giannella; Linda Bussini; Renato Pascale; Michele Bartoletti; Matteo Malagrinò; Livia Pancaldi; Alice Toschi; Giuseppe Ferraro; Lorenzo Marconi; Simone Ambretti; Russell Lewis; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.835

9.  Oral β-Lactam Antibiotics vs Fluoroquinolones or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Definitive Treatment of Enterobacterales Bacteremia From a Urine Source.

Authors:  Jesse D Sutton; Vanessa W Stevens; Nai-Chung N Chang; Karim Khader; Tristan T Timbrook; Emily S Spivak
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01

10.  Adjunctive rifampicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (ARREST): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Guy E Thwaites; Matthew Scarborough; Alexander Szubert; Emmanuel Nsutebu; Robert Tilley; Julia Greig; Sarah A Wyllie; Peter Wilson; Cressida Auckland; Janet Cairns; Denise Ward; Pankaj Lal; Achyut Guleri; Neil Jenkins; Julian Sutton; Martin Wiselka; Gonzalez-Ruiz Armando; Clive Graham; Paul R Chadwick; Gavin Barlow; N Claire Gordon; Bernadette Young; Sarah Meisner; Paul McWhinney; David A Price; David Harvey; Deepa Nayar; Dakshika Jeyaratnam; Tim Planche; Jane Minton; Fleur Hudson; Susan Hopkins; John Williams; M Estee Török; Martin J Llewelyn; Jonathan D Edgeworth; A Sarah Walker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.