| Literature DB >> 27809834 |
Permal Deo1, Erandi Hewawasam1,2, Aris Karakoulakis1, David J Claudie3, Robert Nelson3, Bradley S Simpson4, Nicholas M Smith1, Susan J Semple5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a need to develop potential new therapies for the management of diabetes and hypertension. Australian medicinal plants collected from the Kuuku I'yu (Northern Kaanju) homelands, Cape York Peninsula, Queensland, Australia were investigated to determine their therapeutic potential. Extracts were tested for inhibition of protein glycation and key enzymes relevant to the management of hyperglycaemia and hypertension. The inhibitory activities were further correlated with the antioxidant activities.Entities:
Keywords: Aboriginal; Angiotensin converting enzyme; Antiglycation; Antioxidant activities; Flavonoids; Local knowledge; Phenolics; Traditional medicine; α-amylase; α-glucosidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27809834 PMCID: PMC5095981 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1421-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Different plant species and parts used in this study and local medicinal uses
| Family | Plant species name | Part extracted | Uses according to local medicinal knowledge | Voucher number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Picrodendraceae |
| Leaves, fruits, roots | Toothache, mouth inflammation | BRI AQ0737556 |
|
| Leaves, fruits | Toothache, mouth inflammation | BRI AQ0737696 | |
| Melastomataceae |
| Leaves | Skin infection and inflammation | BRI AQ0737545 |
| Fabaceae |
| Inner bark | Skin sores, inflammation and pruritis | BRI AQ0783017 |
| Malvaceae |
| Root bark | Stomach ache | BRI AQ0783018 |
Total phenolic, flavonoid and FRAP contents in the selected Australian medicinal plant extracts
| Plant name | Total phenolic | Flavonoid content | FRAP |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Leaves | 333.70 ± 11.95e | 14.66 ± 3.25b | 449.98 ± 41.74d |
| Fruits | 347.87 ± 14.90e | 7.02 ± 4.49ab | 453.14 ± 38.19d |
| Roots | 323.53 ± 12.16e | 19.38 ± 5.38bc | 235.68 ± 9.36bc |
|
| |||
| Leaves | 276.96 ± 13.84d | 22.64 ± 4.32c | 453.30 ± 51.79d |
| Fruits | 112.29 ± 5.34b | 3.36 ± 0.87a | 193.34 ± 7.01b |
|
| |||
| Leaves | 140.24 ± 5.28b | 26.30 ± 2.75c | 311.42 ± 23.16c |
|
| |||
| Inner bark | 72.36 ± 15.84a | 10.01 ± 4.05ab | 26.46 ± 1.73a |
|
| |||
| Root bark | 200.71 ± 5.52c | 10.61 ± 3.83ab | 214.52 ± 21.79b |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3
GAE Gallic acid equivalence, QE Quercetin equivalence, FRAP ferric reducing antioxidant potential, AAE ascorbic acid equivalence
Data in the same column marked with different letters were significantly different (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) of selected Australian medicinal plant extracts tested at 0.5 mg/mL. Values are expressed as means ± SD, n = 3. Data marked with different letters were significantly different (p < 0.05). BHT = butyl hydroxyl toluene (positive control)
Pearson’s correlations between total phenolic, flavonoids contents and antioxidant activities of tested Australian medicinal plant extracts
| Antioxidant activities | Pearson’s correlations (r2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Total phenolic | Total flavonoids | |
| FRAP ability | 0.7568b | 0.2932 |
| DPPH radical scavenging ability | 0.5684a | 0.1765 |
a, b indicate significance at p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively
FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant potential, DPPH 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl
IC50 values of tested Australian medicinal plant extracts on fluorescent AGEs, α-amylase, α-glucosidase and ACE
| Plant species | Fluorescent AGEs | α-amylase | α-glucosidase | ACE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Leaves | 56.05 ± 6.10ab | 166.50 ± 5.50a | 167.83 ± 23.82a | 266.27 ± 6.91a |
| Fruits | 47.72 ± 1.65a | 170.81 ± 6.45a | 190.90 ± 19.93a | 452.47 ± 38.51b |
| Roots | 34.49 ± 4.31a | 174.57 ± 5.36a | 345.27 ± 16.33b | 523.87 ± 14.46c |
|
| ||||
| Leaves | 160.74 ± 3.86c | 160.20 ± 27.92a | 185.43 ± 14.05a | 313.37 ± 29.33a |
| Fruits | 83.52 ± 2.02b | 187.90 ± 11.33a | 348.13 ± 28.71b | 597.53 ± 7.48c |
|
| ||||
| Leaves | 76.66 ± 14.50b | 270.47 ± 17.48b | 350.23 ± 24.05b | 609.47 ± 30.92c |
|
| ||||
| Inner bark | 71.48 ± 16.40b | 188.63 ± 12.69a | 183.83 ± 66.30a | 695.17 ± 15.38e |
|
| ||||
| Root bark | 50.51 ± 6.77ab | 310.17 ± 12.88c | 299.30 ± 9.10b | 630.33 ± 11.77d |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3
Data in the same column marked with different letters were significantly different (p < 0.05)
Pearson’s correlations between the IC50 values for fluorescent AGEs, α-amylase, α-glucosidase and ACE versus total phenolic, flavonoids contents and antioxidant activities of tested Australian medicinal plant extracts
| Assays (IC50) | Pearson’s correlations (r2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total phenolics | Total flavonoids | FRAP | DPPH | |
| α-amylase inhibition | −0.3905 | −0.1191 | −0.2948 | −0.1758 |
| α-glucosidase inhibition | −0.3018 | −0.1167 | −0.3227 | −0.3054 |
| Fluorescent AGE inhibition | −0.1594 | −0.3205 | −0.2393 | −0.3460 |
| ACE inhibition | −0.7749b | −0.2460 | −0.8451b | −0.5101a |
a, b indicate significance at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 respectively
FRAP ferric reducing antioxidant potential, DPPH 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, AGE advanced glycation endproducts, ACE Angiotensin converting enzyme