Suzanne E Mitchell1, Gabriela M Weigel2, Sabrina K A Stewart3, Morgan Mako4, John F Loughnane5. 1. 1 Boston Medical Center, Boston University Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts. 2. 2 Department of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, The University of California , San Francisco School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. 3 Department of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, The University of Nottingham Medical School , Nottingham, United Kingdom . 4. 4 Department of Family Medicine, Yale University School of Nursing , Boston Scientific, Orange, Connecticut. 5. 5 Commonwealth Community Care, Commonwealth Care Alliance Medical Group , Lawrence, Kansas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite frequent encounters with the healthcare system and high risk for secondary conditions, it is unclear how frequently individuals living with serious physical disabilities document advance directives (AD) or engage in advance care planning (ACP). Their perspectives on these topics are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the perspectives of individuals with serious physical disabilities receiving care from two different healthcare delivery settings on the value of AD and ACP. DESIGN: Key informant interviews were conducted, audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis and constant comparative analysis. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five adults with serious physical disabilities were interviewed. RESULTS: Five organizing themes emerged as follows: (A) AD is a right versus responsibility, (B) past medical experiences influence ACP engagement, (C) ACP requires relationship-centered decision support, (D) concerns for care after death, and (E) suggestions for improving ACP experiences. Participants wished to engage in a relationship-centered approach to ACP, yet voiced hesitation due to experiences of significant medical bias and mistreatment, typically surrounding judgments of their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Better health professional training in ACP and heightened awareness of the unique ACP considerations pertaining to people with disabilities are recommended.
BACKGROUND: Despite frequent encounters with the healthcare system and high risk for secondary conditions, it is unclear how frequently individuals living with serious physical disabilities document advance directives (AD) or engage in advance care planning (ACP). Their perspectives on these topics are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the perspectives of individuals with serious physical disabilities receiving care from two different healthcare delivery settings on the value of AD and ACP. DESIGN: Key informant interviews were conducted, audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis and constant comparative analysis. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five adults with serious physical disabilities were interviewed. RESULTS: Five organizing themes emerged as follows: (A) AD is a right versus responsibility, (B) past medical experiences influence ACP engagement, (C) ACP requires relationship-centered decision support, (D) concerns for care after death, and (E) suggestions for improving ACP experiences. Participants wished to engage in a relationship-centered approach to ACP, yet voiced hesitation due to experiences of significant medical bias and mistreatment, typically surrounding judgments of their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Better health professional training in ACP and heightened awareness of the unique ACP considerations pertaining to people with disabilities are recommended.
Entities:
Keywords:
advance care planning; advance directive; disability; shared decision making
Authors: Jonathan Koffman; Clarissa Penfold; Laura Cottrell; Bobbie Farsides; Catherine J Evans; Rachel Burman; Richard Nicholas; Stephen Ashford; Eli Silber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Laura Cottrell; Guillaume Economos; Catherine Evans; Eli Silber; Rachel Burman; Richard Nicholas; Bobbie Farsides; Stephen Ashford; Jonathan Simon Koffman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240