Literature DB >> 27809494

Comparison of Ultrafine Particle and Black Carbon Concentration Predictions from a Mobile and Short-Term Stationary Land-Use Regression Model.

Jules Kerckhoffs1, Gerard Hoek1, Kyle P Messier2,3, Bert Brunekreef1,4, Kees Meliefste1, Jochem O Klompmaker1,5, Roel Vermeulen1.   

Abstract

Mobile and short-term monitoring campaigns are increasingly used to develop land-use regression (LUR) models for ultrafine particles (UFP) and black carbon (BC). It is not yet established whether LUR models based on mobile or short-term stationary measurements result in comparable models and concentration predictions. The goal of this paper is to compare LUR models based on stationary (30 min) and mobile UFP and BC measurements from a single campaign. An electric car collected both repeated stationary and mobile measurements in Amsterdam and Rotterdam, The Netherlands. A total of 2964 road segments and 161 stationary sites were sampled over two seasons. Our main comparison was based on predicted concentrations of the mobile and stationary monitoring LUR models at 12 682 residential addresses in Amsterdam. Predictor variables in the mobile and stationary LUR model were comparable, resulting in highly correlated predictions at external residential addresses (R2 of 0.89 for UFP and 0.88 for BC). Mobile model predictions were, on average, 1.41 and 1.91 times higher than stationary model predictions for UFP and BC, respectively. LUR models based upon mobile and stationary monitoring predicted highly correlated UFP and BC concentration surfaces, but predicted concentrations based on mobile measurements were systematically higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27809494     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

1.  Characterization of Annual Average Traffic-Related Air Pollution Concentrations in the Greater Seattle Area from a Year-Long Mobile Monitoring Campaign.

Authors:  Magali N Blanco; Amanda Gassett; Timothy Gould; Annie Doubleday; David L Slager; Elena Austin; Edmund Seto; Timothy V Larson; Julian D Marshall; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 11.357

2.  Mapping Mobility: Utilizing Local-Knowledge-Derived Activity Space to Estimate Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution among Individuals Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness.

Authors:  Maeve G MacMurdo; Karen B Mulloy; Daniel A Culver; Charles W Felix; Andrew J Curtis; Jayakrishnan Ajayakumar; Jacqueline Curtis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Modeling spatial variation of gaseous air pollutants and particulate matters in a Metropolitan area using mobile monitoring data.

Authors:  Jia Xu; Wen Yang; Zhipeng Bai; Renyi Zhang; Jun Zheng; Meng Wang; Tong Zhu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.431

4.  Insights from Application of a Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Model to an Intensive Urban Black Carbon Monitoring Dataset.

Authors:  Travis Hee Wai; Joshua S Apte; Maria H Harris; Thomas W Kirchstetter; Christopher J Portier; Chelsea V Preble; Ananya Roy; Adam A Szpiro
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.755

5.  Mobile and Fixed-Site Measurements To Identify Spatial Distributions of Traffic-Related Pollution Sources in Los Angeles.

Authors:  Mei W Tessum; Timothy Larson; Timothy R Gould; Christopher D Simpson; Michael G Yost; Sverre Vedal
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Comparisons of Traffic-Related Ultrafine Particle Number Concentrations Measured in Two Urban Areas by Central, Residential, and Mobile Monitoring.

Authors:  Matthew C Simon; Neelakshi Hudda; Elena N Naumova; Jonathan I Levy; Doug Brugge; John L Durant
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Land Use Regression Models for Ultrafine Particles in Six European Areas.

Authors:  Erik van Nunen; Roel Vermeulen; Ming-Yi Tsai; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Alex Ineichen; Mark Davey; Medea Imboden; Regina Ducret-Stich; Alessio Naccarati; Daniela Raffaele; Andrea Ranzi; Cristiana Ivaldi; Claudia Galassi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Ariadna Curto; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Marta Cirach; Leda Chatzi; Mariza Kampouri; Jelle Vlaanderen; Kees Meliefste; Daan Buijtenhuijs; Bert Brunekreef; David Morley; Paolo Vineis; John Gulliver; Gerard Hoek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Aviation-Related Impacts on Ultrafine Particle Number Concentrations Outside and Inside Residences near an Airport.

Authors:  N Hudda; M C Simon; W Zamore; J L Durant
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Methods for Assessing Long-Term Exposures to Outdoor Air Pollutants.

Authors:  Gerard Hoek
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-12

10.  Improving emissions inputs via mobile measurements to estimate fine-scale Black Carbon monthly concentrations through geostatistical space-time data fusion.

Authors:  Alejandro Valencia; Saravanan Arunachalam; Vlad Isakov; Brian Naess; Marc Serre
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.