| Literature DB >> 27808564 |
Wenming Yuan1, Genyang Cheng1, Bin Li1, Yansheng Li1, Shan Lu1, Dong Liu1, Jing Xiao1, Zhanzheng Zhao1.
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of endothelin-receptor antagonist (ERA) in the patients with hypertension. Searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were conducted to include all the randomized control trials (RCTs). Eighteen trials including 4898 patients were used in the meta-analysis, of which nine were classified as low risk of bias and the other nine as unclear risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between ERA and placebo groups [6 trials, fixed effects model, RR 1.53 (0.89-2.62); random effects model, RR 1.45 (0.84-2.52)]. ERA significantly reduced 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and sitting blood pressure in patients with hypertension [5 trials, 24-h SBP: WMD -7.65 (-8.95 to -6.36), 24-h DBP: WMD -5.92 (-7.50 to -4.33); 18 trials, SBP: WMD -6.12 (-7.87 to -4.36), DBP: WMD -3.81 (-4.82 to -2.80)]. However, ERA had more adverse events [within 24 h: 3 trials, RR 1.16 (0.82-1.65); after 24 h, 13 trials, RR 1.21 (1.08-1.36)] and severe adverse events than placebo controls [SAE: 9 trials, RR 1.34 (1.13-1.60)]. In addition, there is a potential need for further RCTs that focus on the use of ERA in patients with hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure; Endothelin-receptor antagonist; hypertension; meta-analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27808564 DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2016.1208730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Press ISSN: 0803-7051 Impact factor: 2.835