Literature DB >> 27808524

Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children.

Gerardo Ortega1, Beyza Sümer1, Aslı Özyürek1.   

Abstract

Recent research on signed as well as spoken language shows that the iconic features of the target language might play a role in language development. Here, we ask further whether different types of iconic depictions modulate children's preferences for certain types of sign-referent links during vocabulary development in sign language. Results from a picture description task indicate that lexical signs with 2 possible variants are used in different proportions by deaf signers from different age groups. While preschool and school-age children favored variants representing actions associated with their referent (e.g., a writing hand for the sign PEN), adults preferred variants representing the perceptual features of those objects (e.g., upward index finger representing a thin, elongated object for the sign PEN). Deaf parents interacting with their children, however, used action- and perceptual-based variants in equal proportion and favored action variants more than adults signing to other adults. We propose that when children are confronted with 2 variants for the same concept, they initially prefer action-based variants because they give them the opportunity to link a linguistic label to familiar schemas linked to their action/motor experiences. Our results echo findings showing a bias for action-based depictions in the development of iconic co-speech gestures suggesting a modality bias for such representations during development. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27808524     DOI: 10.1037/dev0000161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  7 in total

1.  Actions speak louder than gestures when you are 2 years old.

Authors:  Miriam A Novack; Courtney A Filippi; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Amanda L Woodward
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-10

2.  The Road to Language Learning Is Not Entirely Iconic: Iconicity, Neighborhood Density, and Frequency Facilitate Acquisition of Sign Language.

Authors:  Naomi K Caselli; Jennie E Pyers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05-30

3.  Degree and not type of iconicity affects sign language vocabulary acquisition.

Authors:  Naomi K Caselli; Jennie E Pyers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Mapping Word to World in ASL: Evidence from a Human Simulation Paradigm.

Authors:  Allison Fitch; Sudha Arunachalam; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-12

5.  Picture-naming in American Sign Language: an electrophysiological study of the effects of iconicity and structured alignment.

Authors:  Meghan E McGarry; Megan Mott; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 6.  Iconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review.

Authors:  Gerardo Ortega
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  Do parents modify child-directed signing to emphasize iconicity?

Authors:  Paris Gappmayr; Amy M Lieberman; Jennie Pyers; Naomi K Caselli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.