Literature DB >> 27807870

Designing therapeutic cancer vaccine trials with delayed treatment effect.

Zhenzhen Xu1, Boguang Zhen1, Yongsoek Park2, Bin Zhu3.   

Abstract

Arming the immune system against cancer has emerged as a powerful tool in oncology during recent years. Instead of poisoning a tumor or destroying it with radiation, therapeutic cancer vaccine, a type of cancer immunotherapy, unleashes the immune system to combat cancer. This indirect mechanism-of-action of vaccines poses the possibility of a delayed onset of clinical effect, which results in a delayed separation of survival curves between the experimental and control groups in therapeutic cancer vaccine trials with time-to-event endpoints. This violates the proportional hazard assumption. As a result, the conventional study design based on the regular log-rank test ignoring the delayed effect would lead to a loss of power. In this paper, we propose two innovative approaches for sample size and power calculation using the piecewise weighted log-rank test to properly and efficiently incorporate the delayed effect into the study design. Both theoretical derivations and empirical studies demonstrate that the proposed methods, accounting for the delayed effect, can reduce sample size dramatically while achieving the target power relative to a standard practice.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer clinical trial; cancer immunotherapy; delayed treatment effect; non-proportional hazard assumption; sample size and power calculation; therapeutic cancer vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807870      PMCID: PMC5512569          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

Review 1.  Antibody therapeutics in cancer.

Authors:  Mark X Sliwkowski; Ira Mellman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sample size calculation for complex clinical trials with survival endpoints.

Authors:  J H Shih
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1995-12

3.  Sample sizes based on the log-rank statistic in complex clinical trials.

Authors:  E Lakatos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Planning the size and duration of a clinical trial studying the time to some critical event.

Authors:  S L George; M M Desu
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1974-02

Review 5.  A clinical development paradigm for cancer vaccines and related biologics.

Authors:  Axel Hoos; Giorgio Parmiani; Kristen Hege; Mario Sznol; Hans Loibner; Alexander Eggermont; Walter Urba; Brent Blumenstein; Natalie Sacks; Ulrich Keilholz; Geoffrey Nichol
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 6.  Cancer immunotherapy: a treatment for the masses.

Authors:  Joseph N Blattman; Philip D Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Evaluation of sample size and power for analyses of survival with allowance for nonuniform patient entry, losses to follow-up, noncompliance, and stratification.

Authors:  J M Lachin; M A Foulkes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Power and sample size calculation for log-rank test with a time lag in treatment effect.

Authors:  Daowen Zhang; Hui Quan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Statistical design of the Women's Health Trial.

Authors:  S Self; R Prentice; D Iverson; M Henderson; D Thompson; D Byar; W Insull; S L Gorbach; C Clifford; S Goldman
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1988-06

10.  Statistical issues and challenges in immuno-oncology.

Authors:  Tai-Tsang Chen
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 13.751

View more
  12 in total

1.  Quantification of Long-term Survival Benefit in a Comparative Oncology Clinical Study.

Authors:  Miki Horiguchi; Lu Tian; Hajime Uno; SuChun Cheng; Dae Hyun Kim; Deb Schrag; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Interim Futility Monitoring Assessing Immune Therapies With a Potentially Delayed Treatment Effect.

Authors:  Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Quantifying treatment differences in confirmatory trials under non-proportional hazards.

Authors:  José L Jiménez
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Cancer immunotherapy trial design with random delayed treatment effect and cure rate.

Authors:  Jianrong Wu; Jing Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Designing cancer immunotherapy trials with random treatment time-lag effect.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Xu; Yongsoek Park; Boguang Zhen; Bin Zhu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Cancer immunotherapy trial design with cure rate and delayed treatment effect.

Authors:  Jing Wei; Jianrong Wu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Cancer immunotherapy trial design with delayed treatment effect.

Authors:  Jianrong Wu; Jing Wei
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 1.234

8.  Design for immuno-oncology clinical trials enrolling both responders and nonresponders.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Xu; Bin Zhu; Yongsoek Park
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Designing cancer immunotherapy trials with delayed treatment effect using maximin efficiency robust statistics.

Authors:  Xue Ding; Jianrong Wu
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 1.234

10.  Estimation of treatment effects in weighted log-rank tests.

Authors:  Ray S Lin; Larry F León
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.