Literature DB >> 27807831

Quantitative Clinical Imaging Methods for Monitoring Intratumoral Evolution.

Joo Yeun Kim1,2, Robert A Gatenby3,4.   

Abstract

Solid tumors are multiscale, open, complex, dynamic systems: complex because they have many interacting components, dynamic because both the components and their interactions can change with time, and open because the tumor freely communicates with surrounding and even distant host tissue. Thus, it is not surprising that striking intratumoral variations are commonly observed in clinical imaging such as MRI and CT and that several recent studies found striking regional variations in the molecular properties of cancer cells from the same tumor. Interestingly, this spatial heterogeneity in molecular properties of tumor cells is typically ascribed to branching clonal evolution due to accumulating mutations while macroscopic variations observed in, for example, clinical MRI scans are usually viewed as functions of blood flow. The clinical significance of spatial heterogeneity has not been fully determined but there is a general consensus that the varying intratumoral landscape along with patient factors such as age, morbidity and lifestyle, contributes significantly to the often unpredictable response of individual patients within a disease cohort treated with the same standard-of-care therapy.Here we investigate the potential link between macroscopic tumor heterogeneity observed by clinical imaging and spatial variations in the observed molecular properties of cancer cells. We build on techniques developed in landscape ecology to link regional variations in the distribution of species with local environmental conditions that define their habitat. That is, we view each region of the tumor as a local ecosystem consisting of environmental conditions such as access to nutrients, oxygen, and means of waste clearance related to blood flow and the local population of tumor cells that both adapt to these conditions and, to some extent, change them through, for example, production of angiogenic factors. Furthermore, interactions among neighboring habitats can produce broader regional dynamics so that the internal diversity of tumors is the net result of complex multiscale somatic Darwinian interactions.Methods in landscape ecology harness Darwinian dynamics to link the environmental properties of a given region to the local populations which are assumed to represent maximally fit phenotypes within those conditions. Consider a common task of a landscape ecologist: defining the spatial distribution of species in a large region, e.g., in a satellite image. Clearly the most accurate approach requires a meter by meter survey of the multiple square kilometers in the region of interest. However, this is both impractical and potentially destructive. Instead, landscape ecology breaks the task into component parts relying on the Darwinian interdependence of environmental properties and fitness of specific species' phenotypic and genotypic properties. First, the satellite map is carefully analyzed to define the number and distribution of habitats. Then the species distribution in a representative sampling of each habitat is empirically determined. Ultimately, this permits sufficient bridging of spatial scales to accurately predict spatial distribution of plant and animal species within large regions.Currently, identifying intratumoral subpopulations requires detailed histological and molecular studies that are expensive and time consuming. Furthermore, this method is subject to sampling bias, is invasive for vital organs such as the brain, and inherently destructive precluding repeated assessments for monitoring post-treatment response and proteogenomic evolution. In contrast, modern cross-sectional imaging can interrogate the entire tumor noninvasively, allowing repeated analysis without disrupting the region of interest. In particular, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides exceptional spatial resolution and generates signals that are unique to the molecular constituents of tissue. Here we propose that MRI scans may be the equivalent of satellite images in landscape ecology and, with appropriate application of Darwinian first principles and sophisticated image analytic methods, can be used to estimate regional variations in the molecular properties of cancer cells.We have initially examined this technique in glioblastoma, a malignant brain neoplasm which is morphologically complex and notorious for a fast progression from diagnosis to recurrence and death, making a suitable subject of noninvasive, rapidly repeated assessment of intratumoral evolution. Quantitative imaging analysis of routine clinical MRIs from glioblastoma has identified macroscopic morphologic characteristics which correlate with proteogenomics and prognosis. The key to the accurate detection and forecasting of intratumoral evolution using quantitative imaging analysis is likely to be in the understanding of the synergistic interactions between observable intratumoral subregions and the resulting tumor behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Darwinian dynamics; Diagnostic imaging methods; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Genetic predisposition to disease; Individualized medicine; Intratumoral heterogeneity; Oncology; Proteogenomics; Treatment resistance and disease recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27807831     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6539-7_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  11 in total

1.  Multiparametric MRI and Coregistered Histology Identify Tumor Habitats in Breast Cancer Mouse Models.

Authors:  Bruna V Jardim-Perassi; Suning Huang; William Dominguez-Viqueira; Jan Poleszczuk; Mikalai M Budzevich; Mahmoud A Abdalah; Smitha R Pillai; Epifanio Ruiz; Marilyn M Bui; Debora A P C Zuccari; Robert J Gillies; Gary V Martinez
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  A population genetics perspective on the determinants of intra-tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Zheng Hu; Ruping Sun; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 3.  A rare case report and literatures review on primary germinoma in cerebellar hemisphere.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Wanchun Zhu; Xiang Li; Jintao He; Chunde Li; Jian Gong
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Clonal evolution in leukemia.

Authors:  Adolfo A Ferrando; Carlos López-Otín
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Magnetic resonance biomarkers in radiation oncology: The report of AAPM Task Group 294.

Authors:  Kiaran P McGee; Ken-Pin Hwang; Daniel C Sullivan; John Kurhanewicz; Yanle Hu; Jihong Wang; Wen Li; Josef Debbins; Eric Paulson; Jeffrey R Olsen; Chia-Ho Hua; Lizette Warner; Daniel Ma; Eduardo Moros; Neelam Tyagi; Caroline Chung
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Superpixel-Based Conditional Random Fields (SuperCRF): Incorporating Global and Local Context for Enhanced Deep Learning in Melanoma Histopathology.

Authors:  Konstantinos Zormpas-Petridis; Henrik Failmezger; Shan E Ahmed Raza; Ioannis Roxanis; Yann Jamin; Yinyin Yuan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Potential Value of Radiomics in the Identification of Stage T3 and T4a Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma Based on Contrast-Enhanced CT Images.

Authors:  Xu Chang; Xing Guo; Xiaole Li; Xiaowei Han; Xiaoxiao Li; Xiaoyan Liu; Jialiang Ren
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Integrating Quantitative Assays with Biologically Based Mathematical Modeling for Predictive Oncology.

Authors:  Anum S Kazerouni; Manasa Gadde; Andrea Gardner; David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Kaitlyn E Johnson; Ernesto A B F Lima; Guillermo Lorenzo; Caleb Phillips; Amy Brock; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-11-13

9.  Glycine-Serine-Threonine Metabolic Axis Delays Intervertebral Disc Degeneration through Antioxidant Effects: An Imaging and Metabonomics Study.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wu; Chang Liu; Shuai Yang; Nana Shen; Yan Wang; Youfu Zhu; Zhaoyang Guo; Shang-You Yang; Dongming Xing; Houxi Li; Zhu Guo; Bohua Chen; Hongfei Xiang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Pretreatment MRI Radiomics Based Response Prediction Model in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Benedetta Gui; Rosa Autorino; Maura Miccò; Alessia Nardangeli; Adele Pesce; Jacopo Lenkowicz; Davide Cusumano; Luca Russo; Salvatore Persiani; Luca Boldrini; Nicola Dinapoli; Gabriella Macchia; Giuseppina Sallustio; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Gabriella Ferrandina; Riccardo Manfredi; Vincenzo Valentini; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.