Literature DB >> 27807782

A prospective study of the relationship between patient character and blood pressure in dental implant surgery.

Masahiro Wada1, Syunta Miwa2, Tomoaki Mameno2, Tohru Suganami2, Kazunori Ikebe2, Yoshinobu Maeda2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients often suffer from physical and mental stress in dental implant surgery. The aim of this prospective study is to investigate the relationship between patient character and blood pressure in dental implant surgery.
METHODS: Fifteen patients were recruited for the present study. All patients had never received implant treatment in the past. To evaluate the patients' personality trait, NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) was used. All patients answered 50 questions at the first visit and divided in five dimensions: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. The index of physical stress was evaluated by blood pressure and pulse rate.
RESULTS: Ten females and five males (mean 55.5 ± 10.6 years) were evaluated in this study. A significant positive correlation was found between elevation rate of diastolic blood pressure/mean blood pressure and neuroticism score (rs = 0.584, 0.526, p < 0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between systolic blood pressure elevation and neuroticism score.
CONCLUSIONS: In this limited study, there was significant correlation between neuroticism character and diastolic blood pressure or mean blood pressure rising in patients who received implant surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure; Implant surgery; Personal traits

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807782      PMCID: PMC5093099          DOI: 10.1186/s40729-016-0054-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Implant Dent        ISSN: 2198-4034


Background

Implant prosthesis has already become one of the treatment options for missing teeth. In addition, under the appropriate maintenance therapy, its longevity is equal or higher compared to the other prosthetic treatments. On the other hand, patients who want to receive the implant treatment cannot avoid the insertion surgery. In addition, if there are hard or soft tissue defects at the planned site, even an additional surgery is necessary [1, 2]. Therefore, patients who want to receive implant prosthesis often suffer from mental and physical stress in the surgical phase. In many cases, we can reduce physical stress under the appropriate anesthesia and monitor general conditions during or just before implant surgery [3]. Mental stress, such as uneasiness or fear, sometimes caused blood pressure elevation. However, this symptom gradually decreases just only by the rest at the place and does not become the problem for implant surgery in most cases. In fact, Schwarz-Arad et al. reported that there is a strong correlation between uneasiness for treatment and the experience of pain at the operation that patients received in the past [4]. They also mentioned that the degree of uneasiness became highest just before the surgery and gradually decreased at the end of the surgery. Morino et al. reported that one of the stress markers, chromogranin A level of salivary, was high before implant surgery [5]. However, in some patient cases, many dentists experienced the uncontrolled patients even if they provided enough informed consent and appropriately managed the general condition at the surgery; as a result, they had to stop or cancel the implant surgery. One of these reasons is thought to be the influence of the patient’s character. Pavek et al. concluded that mean levels of blood pressure of 85 men during a whole day are slightly affected by particular personality traits [6]. Pilqrim et al. also mentioned that acute anxiety or uneasiness can lead to a transient rise in blood pressure [7]. However, there are few reports about these relationships in dental treatment, especially in implant treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between patient character and blood pressure in dental implant surgery.

Methods

Fifteen patients were recruited for the present study. All the patients had never received implant treatment in the past. The patients were not accepted into this study if they met any of the following exclusion criteria: (1) experience of implant treatment in the past, (2) general contraindications to implant surgery, (3) moderate or severe hypertension or cardiovascular system disease, and (4) mental disease. All the patients were informed about the purpose of this study and provided their signed informed consent. To evaluate the patients’ personality trait, NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) was used. All the patients answered 50 questions at the first visit and scored 0–40 in five dimensions: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. The index of physical stress was evaluated by blood pressure and pulse rate. All the patients’ blood pressure (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP)) and pulse rate (PR) were measured by a biological information monitor (Moneo BP-A308, OMRON COLIN Co., Tokyo, Japan) at the first visit, entering into the operation room without local anesthesia given before and after the surgery. Elevation rates (ER) of each blood pressure and PR were calculated. Rate pressure product (RPP) was also calculated by SBP and PR. All the patients received implant surgery under local anesthesia (2 % lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine; DENTSPLY International Inc., PA, USA), and a one- or two-stage surgical approach was selected according to the initial torque values and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Screw-type dental implants (GENESiO Plus, GC Company, Tokyo, Japan) were used in all the patients. SBP_ER, DBP_ER, MBP_ER, PR_ER, and RPP_ER and five dimensions of NEO-FFI were used as correlated variables. For statistical analysis, Spearman’s rank correlation was used and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry (H24-E16-1).

Results

Ten females and five males (mean 55.5 ± 10.6 years) were evaluated in this study (Table 1). Tables 2 and 3 show the patients’ blood pressure, pulse rate, and NEO-FFI scores. Average values of blood pressure and pulse rate at the first visit were 121.2 mmHg; SBP, 74.9 mmHg; DBP, 90.4 mmHg; MBP, 81.6 bpm; PR, RPP, 9791 bpm × mmHg and 143.0 mmHg; SBP, 87.1 mmHg; DBP, 105.7 mmHg; MBP, 69.0 bpm; PR, RPP, 9859 bpm × mmHg just before the surgery. A significant positive correlation was found between DBP_ER/MBP_ER and neuroticism score (rs = 0.584, 0.526, p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation, but the same tendency was found with extraversion score (rs = −0.478, −0.499, p = 0.072, 0.058) in DBP_ER and MBP_ER. On the other hand, there were no significant correlation between SBP_ER, PR_ER, RPP_ER, and neuroticism and extraversion scores. In addition, other personality traits have no correlation with blood pressure, pulse rate, and RPP (Table 4).
Table 1

Overview of the patients’ data. All indexes were elevated just before the implant surgery

No.SexAgeSBP (mmHg)DBP (mmHg)MDP (mmHg)PR (bpm)RPP (bpm × mmHg)
First visit
1Female63915265.0686188
2Male6615586109.09614,880
3Female361106580.0707700
4Male5413992107.7709730
5Male591308096.7658450
6Female411007080.0727200
7Female621058088.3767980
8Male7213090103.3678710
9Female6914888108.08412,432
10Female511207086.7657800
11Male681107083.3738030
12Female461156581.7657475
13Female531097687.0727848
14Female661356588.3749990
15Female591178092.3667722
Mean (SD)57.6 ± 10.3121.2 ± 17.574.9 ± 10.990.4 ± 12.172.2 ± 8.38809.0 ± 2224.0
Just before surgery
1Female631246584.7708680
2Male6617598123.710318,025
3Female361288196.710813,824
4Male5414192108.38411,844
5Male5914399113.7639009
6Female4113390104.37810,374
7Female6215691112.77611,856
8Male721167488.0617076
9Female69198117144.08617,028
10Female511187690.0779086
11Male6814883104.78011,840
12Female461317593.7668646
13Female531328298.7759900
14Female6615996117.07612,084
15Female5914590108.3639135
Mean (SD)57.6 ± 10.3143.0 ± 21.387.1 ± 12.4105.7 ± 14.977.7 ± 13.611,227.1 ± 3108.0
Table 2

Elevation rate (ER) of each index. Blood pressure just before the surgery rose around 20 %

Elevation rate
No.SBP (%)DBP (%)MDP (%)PR (%)RPP (%)
136.325.030.32.940
212.914.013.57.321
316.424.620.854.380
41.40.00.620.022
510.023.817.6−3.17
633.028.630.48.344
748.613.827.50.049
8−10.8−17.8−14.8−9.0−19
933.833.033.32.437
10−1.78.63.818.516
1134.518.625.69.647
1213.915.414.71.516
1321.17.913.44.226
1417.847.732.52.721
1523.912.517.3−4.518
Mean (SD)19.1 ± 15.617.4 ± 14.617.8 ± 13.07.6 ± 15.028.3 ± 22.5
Table 3

NEO-FFI score of the patients. This questionnaire can evaluate the patient’s personal trait in five categories

NEO-FFI score
No.NeuroticismExtraversionOpennessAgreeablenessConscientiousness
12720273226
21427352430
32328253427
41930283019
53310233027
62225323018
71927303028
81432252928
93223242528
102424343626
111729302933
121535333738
13928304131
142021342521
152015263032
Mean (SD)20.6 ± 6.425.6 ± 6.329.3 ± 3.830.9 ± 4.527.1 ± 5.1
Table 4

The correlation between personal traits and blood pressure. A significant positive correlation were found between DBP_ER/MBP_ER and neuroticism score. In addition, there was the same tendency between DBP_ER/MBP_ER and extraversion score

NeuroticismExtraversionOpennessAgreeablenessConscientiousness
SBP_ER (%)rs0.158−0.272−0.047−0.0550.149
p 0.5750.3270.8690.8470.596
DBP_ER (%)rs0.584**−0.478*−0.023−0.271−0.275
p 0.0220.0720.9340.3280.322
MBP_ER (%)rs0.526**−0.499*−0.077−0.299−0.201
p 0.0440.0580.7840.2790.472
PR (%)rs0.0500.2500.3340.200−0.368
p 0.8590.3680.2240.4740.177
RPP (bpm × mmHg)rs0.1020.059−0.0110.029−0.122
p 0.7170.8340.9700.9180.665

*<0.05; **<0.1

Overview of the patients’ data. All indexes were elevated just before the implant surgery Elevation rate (ER) of each index. Blood pressure just before the surgery rose around 20 % NEO-FFI score of the patients. This questionnaire can evaluate the patient’s personal trait in five categories The correlation between personal traits and blood pressure. A significant positive correlation were found between DBP_ER/MBP_ER and neuroticism score. In addition, there was the same tendency between DBP_ER/MBP_ER and extraversion score *<0.05; **<0.1

Discussion

The blood pressure is considered to be affected by many factors, including physical and psychological stress in dental treatment. From a physical aspect, there are many reports about the relationship between blood pressure and local anesthesia or pain [8-11]. In fact, Tsuchihashi et al. reported that there was a correlation between increased blood pressure and infiltrated anesthesia amount [12]. On the other hand, there are not so many studies about the blood pressure change affected by the psychological aspect. In this study, we found that neuroticism is significantly correlated with DBP and MBP increase. Ploubidis et al. reported that a person with a high degree of neuroticism assessed with the Eysenck Personality Inventory tended to self-select situations likely to lead to adversity and distress [13]. Guasti et al. also found that there was a positive correlation between provoked stress and blood pressure change using mental arithmetic stress test [14]. In addition, Eli et al. found that a patient’s anxiety was highest immediately before a surgical procedure compared to immediately post-operatively and at 4 weeks post-operative follow-up [15]. These results are similar to our findings. It is thought that increase of blood pressure sometimes causes hematoma formation and increases circulation blood volume. As a result, the burden to physical condition including cardiac function is expected. Rate pressure product (RPP), which had no correlation with personal traits in this study, is also a reliable predictor of myocardial oxygen consumption, and RPP >12,000 bpm × mmHg is associated with myocardial ischemia [16-18]. There were no severe problems during the implant surgery because the patients in this study did not have moderate or severe hypertension or cardiovascular system disease. However, we should pay enough consideration to elder people or patients who have these systemic diseases and neuroticism or extraversion character during implant surgery. Applications such as nitrous oxide or intravenous sedation may be desirable for these patients. In fact, Ichinobe et al. reported that intravenous sedation stabilized measureable changes in blood pressure and pulse rate due to fear and anxiety about dental treatment [19]. On the other hand, there was no correlation between SBP and neuroticism character. For this reason, it is thought that the range of SBP is usually wide compared to DBP. However, there are some reports about the correlation between SBP and patients’ personality trait [20]. Besides, the excessive rise in SBP during the operation may adversely affect the condition of the patients. Therefore, a further study about this relationship is necessary. Measurement of a stress marker such as cortisol or amylase in saliva is one of the useful methods of stress evaluation. Umeanula reported that patients who received tooth extraction had increased cortisol concentration in saliva and concluded that evaluation of a stress marker is a simple, effective method for stress evaluation [21]. However, measuring the stress marker in saliva costs time and is expense. Alternatively, we used NEO-FFI for the evaluation of patients’ personality trait. NEO-FFI is a simple and easy questionnaire consisting of 50 questions, and we can easily analyze the character tendency of the patients into five dimensions (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness). Yoshimura et al. revealed the validity of NEO-FFI using a large community sample in Japan [22]. Schwartz-Arad et al. reported that there was a positive correlation between the degree of anxiety and patient’s expectation to experience pain during the implant surgery and concluded that in a stressful pre-surgical situation, the ability to process relevant information may be severely impaired and should not be given to patients just before the surgery [4]. Therefore, this non-invasive and simple method for evaluation of a patient’s character is very useful. Besides, it is thought that the results of NEO-FFI, especially neuroticism and extraversion tendency, serve as a stress reference in not only implant treatment but also general dental treatment.

Conclusions

In this limited study, there was a significant correlation between neuroticism character and diastolic blood pressure or mean blood pressure rising in patients who received implant surgery.
  22 in total

1.  Validation of the Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a large community sample.

Authors:  K Yoshimura; Y Ono; K Nakamura; J H Nathan; K Suzuki
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2001-04

2.  Personality characteristics influencing determinacy of day and night blood pressure and heart rate.

Authors:  Karel Pavek; Adam Taube
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 3.  Soft tissue management at implant sites.

Authors:  Francesco Cairo; Umberto Pagliaro; Michele Nieri
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Non-randomized controlled prospective study on perioperative levels of stress and dysautonomia during dental implant surgery.

Authors:  Miyuki Morino; Chihiro Masaki; Yoshinori Seo; Chisato Mukai; Taro Mukaibo; Yusuke Kondo; Shunji Shiiba; Tetsuji Nakamoto; Ryuji Hosokawa
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.642

5.  Systemic management of dental patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  T Ichinohe; Y Kaneko; T Nakakuki; H Aida; H Abe
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1989 Jul-Oct

6.  Blood pressure and electrocardiographic response to dental treatment with use of local anesthesia.

Authors:  A L Hasse; M K Heng; N R Garrett
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 7.  Heart rate and the rate-pressure product as determinants of cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  W B White
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Blood pressure response during dental surgery.

Authors:  T Tsuchihashi; Y Takata; H Kurokawa; K Miura; Y Maruoka; M Kajiyama; M Fujishima
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 9.  Psychological aspects of high and low blood pressure.

Authors:  J A Pilgrim
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  The influence of trait anxiety on the elevation of arterial pressure induced by L-NAME in rats.

Authors:  Flávia Barreto Garcez; Fábio Ursulino Reis Carvalho; Ana Paula Dos Santos Soares; Tiago Costa Goes; Márcio Roberto Viana dos Santos; Flavia Teixeira-Silva
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.