Literature DB >> 27807676

PM2.5 pollution from household solid fuel burning practices in Central India: 2. Application of receptor models for source apportionment.

Jeevan Lal Matawle1,2, Shamsh Pervez3, Manas Kanti Deb1, Anjali Shrivastava4, Suresh Tiwari5.   

Abstract

USEPA's UNMIX, positive matrix factorization (PMF) and effective variance-chemical mass balance (EV-CMB) receptor models were applied to chemically speciated profiles of 125 indoor PM2.5 measurements, sampled longitudinally during 2012-2013 in low-income group households of Central India which uses solid fuels for cooking practices. Three step source apportionment studies were carried out to generate more confident source characterization. Firstly, UNMIX6.0 extracted initial number of source factors, which were used to execute PMF5.0 to extract source-factor profiles in second step. Finally, factor analog locally derived source profiles were supplemented to EV-CMB8.2 with indoor receptor PM2.5 chemical profile to evaluate source contribution estimates (SCEs). The results of combined use of three receptor models clearly describe that UNMIX and PMF are useful tool to extract types of source categories within small receptor dataset and EV-CMB can pick those locally derived source profiles for source apportionment which are analog to PMF-extracted source categories. The source apportionment results have also shown three fold higher relative contribution of solid fuel burning emissions to indoor PM2.5 compared to those measurements reported for normal households with LPG stoves. The previously reported influential source marker species were found to be comparatively similar to those extracted from PMF fingerprint plots. The comparison between PMF and CMB SCEs results were also found to be qualitatively similar. The performance fit measures of all three receptor models were cross-verified and validated and support each other to gain confidence in source apportionment results.

Keywords:  Chemical mass balance (CMB); Indoor PM2.5; Positive matrix factorization (PMF); Solid fuel burning; Source apportionment; UNMIX

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807676     DOI: 10.1007/s10653-016-9889-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  27 in total

1.  PM2.5 source apportionment: reconciling receptor models for U.S. nonurban and urban long-term networks.

Authors:  L W Antony Chen; John G Watson; Judith C Chow; Dave W DuBois; Lisa Herschberger
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Evaluation of the vehicle contributions of metals to indoor environments.

Authors:  Chung-Yih Kuo; Jing-Ya Wang; Wan-Tzu Liu; Pin-Yu Lin; Ching-Tsan Tsai; Man-Ting Cheng
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Chemical characterisation of PM episodes in NE Spain.

Authors:  M Viana; X Querol; A Alastuey
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Estimating the burden of disease attributable to indoor air pollution from household use of solid fuels in South Africa in 2000.

Authors:  Rosana Norman; Brendon Barnes; Angela Mathee; Debbie Bradshaw
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2007-08

5.  Health benefits from reducing indoor air pollution from household solid fuel use in China--three abatement scenarios.

Authors:  Heidi Elizabeth Staff Mestl; Kristin Aunan; Hans Martin Seip
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Chemical constituents in particulate emissions from an integrated iron and steel facility.

Authors:  Jiun-Horng Tsai; Kuo-Hsiung Lin; Chih-Yu Chen; Jian-Yuan Ding; Ching-Guan Choa; Hung-Lung Chiang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Indoor air pollution in India.

Authors:  K R Smith
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.537

8.  Methods for estimating uncertainty in PMF solutions: examples with ambient air and water quality data and guidance on reporting PMF results.

Authors:  Steven G Brown; Shelly Eberly; Pentti Paatero; Gary A Norris
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Indoor air quality assessment in and around urban slums of Delhi city, India.

Authors:  P Kulshreshtha; M Khare; P Seetharaman
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.770

10.  Daily average exposures to respirable particulate matter from combustion of biomass fuels in rural households of southern India.

Authors:  Kalpana Balakrishnan; Sambandam Sankar; Jyothi Parikh; Ramaswamy Padmavathi; Kailasam Srividya; Vidhya Venugopal; Swarna Prasad; Vijay Laxmi Pandey
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.