Ningjian Wang1, Jing Cheng1, Bing Han1, Qin Li1, Yi Chen1, Fangzhen Xia1, Boren Jiang1, Michael D Jensen2, Yingli Lu3. 1. Institute and Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. 2. Endocrine Research Unit, 5-194 Joseph, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. jensen@mayo.edu. 3. Institute and Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. luyingli2008@126.com.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Limited studies have compared the effect of prenatal or postnatal exposure to different severities of famine on the risk of developing diabetes. We aimed to measure the association between diabetes in adulthood and the exposure to different degrees of famine early in life (during the prenatal or postnatal period) during China's Great Famine (1959-1962). METHODS: Data from 3967 individuals were included (a total of 2115 individuals from areas severely affected by famine, 1858 from moderately affected areas, 6 excluded due to missing data). A total of 2335 famine-exposed individuals were further divided into those exposed during the fetal stage, childhood or adolescence/young adulthood. We constructed a difference-in-differences model to compare HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose among the participants exposed to different degrees of famine intensity at different life stages. Logistic analyses were used as measures of the association between diabetes and the different levels of famine severity at different life stages. RESULTS: Individuals who had been exposed to famine during the fetal period, childhood, and adolescence/adulthood and who had lived in a severely affected area had a 0.31%, 0.20% and 0.27% higher HbA1c, respectively, (all p < 0.01) compared with unexposed individuals. After adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, education level and waist circumference, participants exposed to severe famine during the fetal stage (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12, 3.21) and childhood (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06, 1.97) had significantly higher odds estimates. Unexposed participants living in severely and moderately affected areas had a comparable prevalence of diabetes (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.80, 1.87). A significant interaction between famine exposure during the fetal and childhood periods and the level of severity in the area of exposure was found (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Exposure to severe famine in the fetal or childhood period may predict a higher HbA1c and an increased diabetes risk in adulthood. These results from China indicate that both the prenatal and postnatal period may offer critical time windows for the determination of the risk of diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Limited studies have compared the effect of prenatal or postnatal exposure to different severities of famine on the risk of developing diabetes. We aimed to measure the association between diabetes in adulthood and the exposure to different degrees of famine early in life (during the prenatal or postnatal period) during China's Great Famine (1959-1962). METHODS: Data from 3967 individuals were included (a total of 2115 individuals from areas severely affected by famine, 1858 from moderately affected areas, 6 excluded due to missing data). A total of 2335 famine-exposed individuals were further divided into those exposed during the fetal stage, childhood or adolescence/young adulthood. We constructed a difference-in-differences model to compare HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose among the participants exposed to different degrees of famine intensity at different life stages. Logistic analyses were used as measures of the association between diabetes and the different levels of famine severity at different life stages. RESULTS: Individuals who had been exposed to famine during the fetal period, childhood, and adolescence/adulthood and who had lived in a severely affected area had a 0.31%, 0.20% and 0.27% higher HbA1c, respectively, (all p < 0.01) compared with unexposed individuals. After adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, education level and waist circumference, participants exposed to severe famine during the fetal stage (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12, 3.21) and childhood (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06, 1.97) had significantly higher odds estimates. Unexposed participants living in severely and moderately affected areas had a comparable prevalence of diabetes (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.80, 1.87). A significant interaction between famine exposure during the fetal and childhood periods and the level of severity in the area of exposure was found (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Exposure to severe famine in the fetal or childhood period may predict a higher HbA1c and an increased diabetes risk in adulthood. These results from China indicate that both the prenatal and postnatal period may offer critical time windows for the determination of the risk of diabetes.
Authors: Goodarz Danaei; Carlene M M Lawes; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nam H Cho; Juliana C N Chan; Hak Chul Jang; Soo Lim; Hyung L Kim; Sung Hee Choi Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Goodarz Danaei; Mariel M Finucane; Yuan Lu; Gitanjali M Singh; Melanie J Cowan; Christopher J Paciorek; John K Lin; Farshad Farzadfar; Young-Ho Khang; Gretchen A Stevens; Mayuree Rao; Mohammed K Ali; Leanne M Riley; Carolyn A Robinson; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elmar W Tobi; Jelle J Goeman; Ramin Monajemi; Hongcang Gu; Hein Putter; Yanju Zhang; Roderick C Slieker; Arthur P Stok; Peter E Thijssen; Fabian Müller; Erik W van Zwet; Christoph Bock; Alexander Meissner; L H Lumey; P Eline Slagboom; Bastiaan T Heijmans Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Teodor T Postolache; Laura Del Bosque-Plata; Serge Jabbour; Michael Vergare; Rongling Wu; Claudia Gragnoli Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.568