| Literature DB >> 27807537 |
Ying Zhou1, Jing Lu1, Jinge Wang2, Hongjing Yan1, Jianjun Li1, Xiaoqin Xu1, Zhi Zhang1, Tao Qiu1, Ping Ding1, Gengfeng Fu1, Xiping Huan1, Haiyang Hu1.
Abstract
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been shown to improve survival of patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection and to reduce HIV-1 transmission. Therefore, the Chinese central government initiated a national program to provide ART free of charge to HIV-1 patients. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Jiangsu province to determine the level of drug resistance (DR) in HIV-1 infected patients and the correlates of DR in virological failures in 2012. Approximately 10.4% of the HIV-1 patients in the study experienced virological failure after one year of ART and were divided into drug sensitive and drug resistant groups based on genotype determination. The viral loads (VLs) in the drug resistant group were significantly lower than the drug sensitive group. There were two independent predictors of virological failure: male gender and increasing duration of treatment. The primary mutations observed in the study were against nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) which were M184V (79.45%) and K103N (33.70%) in nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). The overall rate of DR in Jiangsu province is still relatively low among treated patients. However, close monitoring of drug resistance in male patients in the early stages of treatment is vital to maintaining and increasing the benefits of HIV ART achieved to date.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27807537 PMCID: PMC5078637 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1752437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Demographic characteristics of HIV-1 treated patients with virological failure on ART and univariate analyses for correlates of drug resistance.
| Variables | Virologic failure | Drug resistance |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | % | ||||
| Age (years) | 0.050 | 0.975 | |||
| <30 | 38 | 19.4 | 50 (19) | ||
| 30–50 | 121 | 61.7 | 52.1 (63) | ||
| >50 | 37 | 18.9 | 51.4 (19) | ||
| Gender | 3.424 | 0.064 | |||
| Male | 159 | 81.1 | 54.7 (87) | ||
| Female | 37 | 18.9 | 37.8 (14) | ||
| Marital status | 0.161 | 0.923 | |||
| Single | 52 | 26.5 | 53.8 (28) | ||
| Married | 110 | 56.1 | 50.9 (56) | ||
| Other | 34 | 17.3 | 50.0 (17) | ||
| Routes of infection | 4.876 | 0.300 | |||
| Blood | 11 | 5.6 | 63.6 (7) | ||
| IDU | 6 | 3.1 | 66.7 (4) | ||
| MSM | 68 | 34.7 | 57.4 (39) | ||
| Hetro | 96 | 49.0 | 43.8 (42) | ||
| Other | 15 | 7.7 | 60.0 (9) | ||
| WHO clinical stages | 10.442 | 0.015 | |||
| I | 101 | 51.5 | 40.6 (41) | ||
| II | 50 | 25.5 | 60.0 (30) | ||
| III | 28 | 14.3 | 67.9 (19) | ||
| IV | 17 | 8.7 | 64.7 (11) | ||
| Treatment duration | 18.376 | 0.000 | |||
| <1 | 16 | 8.2 | 6.2 (1) | ||
| 1-2 | 120 | 61.2 | 52.5 (63) | ||
| 2-3 | 39 | 19.9 | 53.8 (21) | ||
| >3 | 21 | 10.7 | 76.2 (16) | ||
| Side effect | 3.594 | 0.058 | |||
| Yes | 13 | 6.6 | 76.9 (10) | ||
| No | 183 | 93.4 | 49.7 (91) | ||
| SMZ taken | 4.280 | 0.039 | |||
| Yes | 11 | 5.6 | 81.8 (9) | ||
| No | 185 | 94.4 | 49.7 (92) | ||
| Treatment regimen | 1.909 | 0.592 | |||
| AZT/D4T + 3TC + NVP/EFV | 176 | 89.8 | 51.1 (90) | ||
| TDF + 3TC + NVP/EFV | 14 | 7.1 | 50.0 (7) | ||
| AZT + 3TC + LPV/r | 4 | 2.0 | 50.0 (2) | ||
| AZT + TDF + LPV/r | 2 | 1.0 | 100 (2) | ||
IDU: intravenous drug use; MSM: men who have sex with men; hetro: heterosexual; SMZ: compound sulfamethoxazole; AZT: zidovudine; TDF: tenofovir; 3TC: lamivudine; NVP: nevirapine; LPV/r: lopinavir + ritonavir.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with HIV-1 drug resistance.
| Factors | Variables |
| RR | 95% CI for RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Gender | Male | 1 | |||
| Female | 0.019 | 0.362 | 0.155 | 0.844 | |
|
| |||||
| WHO clinical stages | I | 0.297 | |||
| II | 0.085 | 1.926 | 0.913 | 4.063 | |
| III | 0.224 | 1.815 | 0.694 | 4.742 | |
| IV | 0.859 | 1.125 | 0.308 | 4.102 | |
|
| |||||
| Treated duration | <1 | 0.009 | |||
| 1-2 | 0.014 | 13.616 | 1.715 | 108.109 | |
| 2-3 | 0.007 | 19.556 | 2.278 | 167.857 | |
| >3 | 0.001 | 50.579 | 4.855 | 526.891 | |
|
| |||||
| Side effect | Yes | 1 | |||
| No | 0.186 | 20576 | 0.634 | 10.468 | |
|
| |||||
| SMZ taken | Yes | 1 | |||
| No | 0.123 | 3.707 | 0.700 | 19.633 | |
SMZ: compound sulfamethoxazole.
Figure 1The percentage of patients with specific antiviral mutations. Based on the genotype results, the drug resistant strains were divided into nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI); nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI); and protease inhibitor (PI) resistant strains using the Stanford website. The percentage of patients with NRTI, NNRTI, or PI resistant strains is shown. The denominator in all cases is 196 patients, all those who experienced virological failure and had serum samples available. The numerators for each column were NRTI = 73 (including multiple drug resistant strains); NNRTI = 92 (including multiple drug resistant strains); PI = 11 (including multiple drug resistant strains); NRTI + NNRTI = 70; PI + NRTI = 4; and PI + NNRTI = 5. In addition, 95 strains had none of the drug resistance mutations.
Figure 2The frequencies of resistant mutations associated with NRTI. The results of these mutations presented here are all from the patients' sequence alignment on Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database. The percentages of mutation were showed in the figures. (a) The denominator in these cases is the number of patients who get any NRTI mutations (n = 73). M184V (n = 58), followed by M41L (n = 17), M184I (n = 8), and K70R (n = 8) in sequence. (b) The denominator in these cases is the number of patients who get any NNRTI mutations (n = 92). The most numerous mutation in NNRTI is K103N (n = 31), followed by Y181C (n = 27), G190A (n = 25), and V108I (n = 25).