Literature DB >> 27807439

Commentary: New evidence for grain specific C4 photosynthesis in wheat.

Parimalan Rangan1, Agnelo Furtado2, Robert J Henry2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bose anatomy; C4; Kranz-anatomy; anatomy; seed; wheat

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807439      PMCID: PMC5070121          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


× No keyword cloud information.
Analysis of the transcriptome revealed the expression of a complete set of enzymes specific for a C4 photosynthetic pathway in the pericarp of the developing wheat seed (Rangan et al., 2016). C4 photosynthesis is not utilized in wheat leaves with temperatures during the early vegetative stages of wheat growth favoring C3 photosynthesis. Wheat crops mature in the spring when growing in the native “Mediterranean” climate of wild wheat progenitors and face rapidly increasing temperatures and drying conditions. The activity of the C4 pathway may contribute to crop yields especially in wheat crops under temperature or moisture stress during grain filling. The anatomy of the seed supports photosynthesis with cross cells and tube cells in what we are calling “Bose” anatomy paralleling the “Kranz” anatomy of C4 leaves with mesophyll cells and bundle sheath cells. Photosynthesis (C4) in these tissues may make a significant contribution to grain yield through efficient carbon capture. C4 photosynthesis in the wheat seed provides an adaptation to heat and moisture stress and is an efficient mechanism for minimizing carbon loss due to respiration during grain filling through re-fixation of carbon New technologies often provide novel perspectives that modify long standing assumptions. The widespread application of modern sequencing (Rossetto and Henry, 2014) to transcriptome analysis has provided unprecedented opportunities for new insights. RNA-Seq of the developing wheat grain has delivered new explanations for the genetic variation in grain quality in wheat (Furtado et al., 2015). Changes in the expression of genes associated with specific metabolic pathways were analyzed at different stages in grain development. The unexpected outcome was the discovery of C4 photosynthetic genes in the genome (Rangan et al., 2016) with the expression of C4 photosynthetic genes being optimal during early to mid-grain filling. This illustrates the power of genomics in providing novel perspectives in plant biology (Abberton et al., 2016). The developing wheat grain has long been recognized as being photosynthetic but wheat is a classical C3 plant. Careful analysis of the literature over a long period of time reveals extensive but highly fragmented evidence for C4 photosynthesis in developing wheat grains. Elaborate explanations have often been offered to explain away the results due to the clear evidence for C3 photosynthesis in the leaves and the dogma of a requirement for Kranz anatomy for C4 photosynthesis to be accomplished. Different pathways may be found in different parts of the same plants or in different environments (Hibberd and Quick, 2002). Evidence for C4 photosynthesis in the pericarp of cereals has been controversial because of uncertainties due to the difficulty of demonstrating flux of carbon through the pathway and the carbon isotope discrimination (Farquhar et al., 1989) being unlike that in C4 leaves. The complex pathway of carbon to the pericarp via photosynthetic fixation in C3 photosynthesis in the leaves and respiration in the endosperm before arriving at the pericarp explains these issues. Isolated pericarp tissues have been used to demonstrate the flux of carbon into malate and then sugars in barley (Nutbeam and Duffus, 1976). C4 photosynthesis was discovered around 50 years ago and has been associated with adaptation to low carbon environments within the plant often due to high temperatures and the associated management of water loss in dry environments. Plants have been categorized as C3 or C4 based upon leaf anatomy. Wheat is clearly a C3 plant on this basis. However, different photosynthetic pathways have been reported in different organs of plants; and the possibility of C4 photosynthesis without Kranz anatomy supports the possibility of grain specific photosynthetic pathways. The classical C4 leaf displays Kranz anatomy allowing the different parts of the C4 pathway to be compartmentalized in different cells within the leaf. The inner pericarp of the developing wheat grain has two distinct cell layers, cross cells, and tube cells, that correspond anatomically with the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of the C4 leaf. We propose here that this seed anatomy be described as “Bose” anatomy in honor of the early photosynthesis researcher Jagadish Chandra Bose who reported that C4 acids are involved in carbon fixation in Hydrilla verticillata during summer (Bose, 1924) and not during winter in 1924 well before the C3 pathway of carbon fixation was described in 1957 (Calvin, 1957). Genes encoding a complete NAD-dependent C4 pathway have been detected in the wheat genome and are expressed in the developing wheat grain at the relative levels required to support C4 photosynthesis with appropriate subcellular compartmentalization (Rangan et al., 2016). These genes were found in all three progenitor genomes of hexaploid wheat genome suggesting they evolved at a similar time to that reported in other grasses. Seed photosynthesis is necessarily unique as the seed is a major carbon sink while most photosynthetic tissues are a net source of carbon. This complicates the interpretation of macromolecule assembly may involve significant CO2 release. This suggests a role for seed photosynthesis in recapture of CO2 generated in the endosperm. Early work by Kriedemann (1966) showed that ear photosynthesis could account for 10–44% of carbon fixation in wheat and that much of the carbon captured by the wheat ear was derived from seed respiration. Genetic improvement of wheat is critical to the food demands of a growing human population. Targeting selection for enhanced seed photosynthesis may contribute significantly to improving wheat yields. This may be especially important under harsh environmental conditions late in the growth of the crop. Stress late in crop development is often encountered in wheat production and may become increasingly important as a result of climate change (Henry et al., 2016).

Author contributions

All authors conceived, wrote, and edited the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Functional cereals for production in new and variable climates.

Authors:  Robert J Henry; Parimalan Rangan; Agnelo Furtado
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 7.834

2.  Characteristics of C4 photosynthesis in stems and petioles of C3 flowering plants.

Authors:  Julian M Hibberd; W Paul Quick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evidence for C4 photosynthesis in barley pericarp tissue.

Authors:  A R Nutbeam; C M Duffus
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1976-06-21       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Escape from the laboratory: new horizons for plant genetics.

Authors:  Maurizio Rossetto; Robert J Henry
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  A novel highly differentially expressed gene in wheat endosperm associated with bread quality.

Authors:  A Furtado; P C Bundock; P M Banks; G Fox; X Yin; R J Henry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  New evidence for grain specific C4 photosynthesis in wheat.

Authors:  Parimalan Rangan; Agnelo Furtado; Robert J Henry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Global agricultural intensification during climate change: a role for genomics.

Authors:  Michael Abberton; Jacqueline Batley; Alison Bentley; John Bryant; Hongwei Cai; James Cockram; Antonio Costa de Oliveira; Leland J Cseke; Hannes Dempewolf; Ciro De Pace; David Edwards; Paul Gepts; Andy Greenland; Anthony E Hall; Robert Henry; Kiyosumi Hori; Glenn Thomas Howe; Stephen Hughes; Mike Humphreys; David Lightfoot; Athole Marshall; Sean Mayes; Henry T Nguyen; Francis C Ogbonnaya; Rodomiro Ortiz; Andrew H Paterson; Roberto Tuberosa; Babu Valliyodan; Rajeev K Varshney; Masahiro Yano
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 9.803

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Sterile Spikelets Contribute to Yield in Sorghum and Related Grasses.

Authors:  Taylor AuBuchon-Elder; Viktoriya Coneva; David M Goad; Lauren M Jenkins; Yunqing Yu; Doug K Allen; Elizabeth A Kellogg
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Exploring natural variation of photosynthesis in a site-specific manner: evolution, progress, and prospects.

Authors:  Prabuddha Dehigaspitiya; Paul Milham; Gavin J Ash; Kiruba Arun-Chinnappa; Dananjali Gamage; Anke Martin; Seiji Nagasaka; Saman Seneweera
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 3.  Using Biotechnology-Led Approaches to Uplift Cereal and Food Legume Yields in Dryland Environments.

Authors:  Sangam L Dwivedi; Kadambot H M Siddique; Muhammad Farooq; Philip K Thornton; Rodomiro Ortiz
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  The transcriptome of the developing grain: a resource for understanding seed development and the molecular control of the functional and nutritional properties of wheat.

Authors:  Parimalan Rangan; Agnelo Furtado; Robert J Henry
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Comparative transcriptome analysis to identify candidate genes involved in 2-methoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (MNQ) biosynthesis in Impatiens balsamina L.

Authors:  Lian Chee Foong; Jian Yi Chai; Anthony Siong Hock Ho; Brandon Pei Hui Yeo; Yang Mooi Lim; Sheh May Tam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.