Literature DB >> 27806661

Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour after 41 + 0 weeks compared to expectant management.

Elaine Yuzhen Teo1,2, Sailesh Kumar1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the incidence of intrapartum fetal compromise in women who are induced compared to those managed expectantly. The aim of this study was to investigate intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in women who were induced at >41 + 0 weeks compared to an expectantly managed cohort.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous pregnancies delivering between 41 + 0 to 43 + 0 weeks at the Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane. We compared outcomes between women who were induced and those that laboured spontaneously.
RESULTS: Six thousand five hundred and one women met the inclusion criteria. Three thousand five hundred and eighty-eight women (55.2%) underwent IOL and 2913 women (44.8%) were managed expectantly. Higher rates of emergency caesarean section (29.4% versus 18.5%, p < 0.001) and higher rates of instrumental birth (20.2% versus 17.7%, p = 0.012) were found in the IOL cohort. The odds of requiring an emergency CS for non-reassuring fetal status was increased (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.21-1.90). Other than a high proportion of neonatal acidosis in the IOL cohort, there were no differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: IOL > 41 weeks compared to expectant management results in higher rates of emergency caesarean section mainly due to intrapartum fetal compromise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Induction of labour; caesarean; intrapartum intervention rate; perinatal outcomes; prolonged pregnancy; spontaneous labour

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27806661     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1255190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  3 in total

1.  A prospective pilot study of Dilapan-S compared with Propess for induction of labour at 41+ weeks in nulliparous pregnancy.

Authors:  David A Crosby; Claire O'Reilly; Helen McHale; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; Rhona Mahony
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Aafke Bruinsma; Judit Kj Keulen; Joep C Kortekaas; Jeroen van Dillen; Ruben G Duijnhoven; Patrick Mm Bossuyt; Anton H van Kaam; Joris Am van der Post; Ben W Mol; Esteriek de Miranda
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2022-10-03

3.  A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.

Authors:  Dominiek Coates; Angela Makris; Christine Catling; Amanda Henry; Vanessa Scarf; Nicole Watts; Deborah Fox; Purshaiyna Thirukumar; Vincent Wong; Hamish Russell; Caroline Homer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.