Hugo Palmans1, Stanislav M Vatnitsky2. 1. Medical Physics Department, EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt A-2700, Austria and Acoustics and Ionising Radiation Division, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington TW11 0LW, United Kingdom. 2. Medical Physics Department, EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt A-2700, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To propose a formalism for the reference dosimetry of scanned light-ion beams consistent with IAEA TRS-398 and Alfonso et al. [Med. Phys. 35, 5179-5186 (2008)]. To identify machine-specific reference (msr) fields and plan-class specific reference (pcsr) fields consistent with the definitions given by Alfonso et al. To review the literature of beam monitor calibration in scanned beams using three different methods in terms of this common formalism. METHODS: Four types of msr fields are identified as those that are meant to calibrate the beam monitor for scanned beams with particular energies. Two types of pcsr fields are identified as those that are meant to apply one or more tuning factors to the entire delivery chain. RESULTS: The formalism establishes the energy-dependent relation between the number of particles incident on the phantom surface and the beam monitor reading and distinguishes three routes to determine the beam monitor calibration function: (i) the use of a calibrated reference ionization chamber in a single-layer scanned beam, (ii) the use of a cross-calibrated large-area parallel plate ionization chamber in a single-energy beamlet, and (iii) the use of a calibrated reference ionization chamber in a box field to adjust a calibration curve obtained by a Faraday cup or an ionization chamber. Examples of all three methods and comparisons between them from the literature are analysed. CONCLUSIONS: The formalism can form the basis of future dosimetry recommendations for scanned particle beams and the analysis of the literature data in terms of this formalism can form the basis of data compilations for the application of the dosimetry procedures.
PURPOSE: To propose a formalism for the reference dosimetry of scanned light-ion beams consistent with IAEA TRS-398 and Alfonso et al. [Med. Phys. 35, 5179-5186 (2008)]. To identify machine-specific reference (msr) fields and plan-class specific reference (pcsr) fields consistent with the definitions given by Alfonso et al. To review the literature of beam monitor calibration in scanned beams using three different methods in terms of this common formalism. METHODS: Four types of msr fields are identified as those that are meant to calibrate the beam monitor for scanned beams with particular energies. Two types of pcsr fields are identified as those that are meant to apply one or more tuning factors to the entire delivery chain. RESULTS: The formalism establishes the energy-dependent relation between the number of particles incident on the phantom surface and the beam monitor reading and distinguishes three routes to determine the beam monitor calibration function: (i) the use of a calibrated reference ionization chamber in a single-layer scanned beam, (ii) the use of a cross-calibrated large-area parallel plate ionization chamber in a single-energy beamlet, and (iii) the use of a calibrated reference ionization chamber in a box field to adjust a calibration curve obtained by a Faraday cup or an ionization chamber. Examples of all three methods and comparisons between them from the literature are analysed. CONCLUSIONS: The formalism can form the basis of future dosimetry recommendations for scanned particle beams and the analysis of the literature data in terms of this formalism can form the basis of data compilations for the application of the dosimetry procedures.
Authors: Andreas Franz Resch; Paul David Heyes; Hermann Fuchs; Niels Bassler; Dietmar Georg; Hugo Palmans Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Andreas F Resch; Alessio Elia; Hermann Fuchs; Antonio Carlino; Hugo Palmans; Markus Stock; Dietmar Georg; Loïc Grevillot Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Elisabeth Mara; Monika Clausen; Suphalak Khachonkham; Simon Deycmar; Clara Pessy; Wolfgang Dörr; Peter Kuess; Dietmar Georg; Sylvia Gruber Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Hermann Fuchs; Alessio Elia; Andreas F Resch; Peter Kuess; Armin Lühr; Marie Vidal; Loïc Grevillot; Dietmar Georg Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-12-25 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Andreas F Resch; Fatima Padilla Cabal; Milovan Regodic; Wolfgang Lechner; Gerd Heilemann; Peter Kuess; Dietmar Georg; Hugo Palmans Journal: Med Phys Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Rajesh Pidikiti; Bijal C Patel; Matthew R Maynard; Joseph P Dugas; Joseph Syh; Narayan Sahoo; Hsinshun Terry Wu; Lane R Rosen Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 2.102