| Literature DB >> 27806342 |
Zhicong Chen1, Anbang He1, Dailian Wang1, Yuchen Liu1, Weiren Huang1.
Abstract
HOXA transcript at the distal tip (HOTTIP), a functional lncRNA transcribed from the 5' tip of the HOXA locus, has been functionally characterized as an oncogene in various cancers. To further explore the clinical value of HOTTIP in cancer, we collected all relevant studies and investigated the association between HOTTIP level and lymph node metastasis (LNM) or overall survival (OS). Literature collection was conducted by searching electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)(up to July 7, 2016). Seven studies with 652 cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results showed a significant positive association between HOTTIP levels and LNM (Odds ratio, OR = 2.30, 95 % CI: 1.58-3.35, p < 0.0001) in a fixed-effects model (I2 = 0 %, p = 0.949) and it could also predict poor OS in cancer patients (Hazard ratio HR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.74-2.90, p < 0.00001) in a fixed-effects model (I2 = 0%, p = 0.925). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrated that the higher expression level of HOTTIP is correlated with positive LNM and poor OS in different types of cancer and HOTTIP might serve as a novel predictor of LNM and survival in human cancer.Entities:
Keywords: HOTTIP; cancer; lncRNA; lymph node metastasis; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27806342 PMCID: PMC5355167 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12981
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Flowchart of selecting studies for inclusion
Characteristics of studies in this meta-analysis
| Study | Year | Country | Cancer | Total | Detection | Cut-off | HOTTIP expression | Survival | Multivariate | HR | Hazard ratios | Follow-up, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | High | Low | Low | ||||||||||||
| Quagliata | 2014 | Switzerland | HCC | 52 | RT-qPCR | ROC | 32 | NA | 20 | NA | OS | No | Survival curve | 1.560 | 80 |
| Wang | 2015 | China | PC | 144 | RT-qPCR | ROC | 118 | 75 | 26 | 10 | OS | Yes | Data in paper | 2.589 | 60 |
| Ren | 2015 | China | CRC | 156 | RT-qPCR | Median | 77 | 47 | 79 | 36 | OS | Yes | Data in paper | 2.151 (1.306-3.415) | 46 |
| Li | 2015 | China | OSA | 68 | RT-qPCR | Median | 34 | NA | 34 | NA | OS | Yes | Data in paper | 2.887 (1.367-7.061) | 60 |
| Zhang | 2015 | China | TSCC | 86 | RT-qPCR | Median | 44 | 28 | 42 | 18 | OS | Yes | Data in paper | 2.113 | 38 |
| Lian | 2016 | China | CRC | 48 | RT-qPCR | X-tile algorithm | 32 | 21 | 16 | 7 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Ye | 2016 | China | GC | 98 | RT-qPCR | Median | 49 | 39 | 49 | 29 | OS | Yes | Survival curve | 2.420 | 60 |
HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, PC pancreatic cancer, CRC colorectal cancer, OSA osteosarcoma, TSCC tongue squamous cell carcinoma, GC gastric cancer, RT-qPCR real-time quantitative PCR, LNM lymph node metastasis, OS overall survival, NA not available.
Methodological quality of the eligible studies according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale
| Author/year | Country | Adequacy of case definition | Representativeness of the cases | Selection | Definition of controls | Comparability cases/controls | Ascertainment of exposure | Same method of ascertainment | Nonreponse rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quagliata | Switzerland | ★ | ★ | ★ | NA | ★★ | ★ | ★ | NA |
| Wang | China | ★ | ★ | ★ | NA | ★★ | ★ | ★ | NA |
| Ren | China | ★ | ★ | ★ | NA | ★★ | ★ | ★ | NA |
| Li | China | ★ | ★ | ★ | NA | ★★ | ★ | ★ | NA |
| Zhang | China | ★ | ★ | ★ | NA | ★★ | ★ | ★ | NA |
| Lian | China | ★ | ★ | ★ | NA | ★★ | ★ | ★ | NA |
| Ye | China | ★ | ★ | ★ | NA | ★★ | ★ | ★ | NA |
Notes: This table identifies “high-quality” choices with a “star (*)”. A study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the selection and exposure categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for comparability. NA: not available
Figure 2Forest plot of the correlation between HOTTIP expression levels and LNM in different cancer patients
Figure 3Forest plot of the correlation between HOTTIP expression levels and OS in different cancer patients
Figure 4Funnel plot analysis of potential publication bias in LNM and OS group(Egger's test): A. LNM group; B. OS group