| Literature DB >> 27806122 |
Tao Wan1,2, Qingxiang Han3, Ling Xian4, Yu Cao4, Apudo A Andrew2,4, Xiaojie Pan5, Wei Li4, Fan Liu2,4.
Abstract
Reproductive allocation is a key process in the plant life cycle and aquatic plants exhibit great diversity in their reproductive systems. In the present study, we conduct a field investigation of three aquatic macrophytes: Stuckenia pectinata, Myriophyllum spicatum, and Potamogeton perfoliatus. Our results showed that widespread species, including S. pectinata and M. spicatum had greater plasticity in their allocation patterns in the form of increased sexual and asexual reproduction, and greater potential to set seeds and increase fitness in more eutrophic environments. P. perfoliatus also exhibited a capacity to adopt varied sexual reproductive strategies such as setting more offspring for the future, although only in clear conditions with low nutrient levels. Our results establish strategies and mechanisms of some species for tolerating and surviving in varied eutrophic lake conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27806122 PMCID: PMC5091910 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Sampling sites of the 8 lakes.
Sampling sites, physicochemical parameters of the 8 lakes and presence and absence the three macrophytes species: Stuckenia pectinata, Myriophyllum spicatum, and Potamogeton perfoliatus.
| Sampling sites | Lakes | Location | PH | TDS(mg/L) | SAL(ppt) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FX01 | Fuxian Lake | N 24°37′30″, E 102°51′9″ | + | + | + | 8.41 | 230.1 | 0.17 |
| FX02 | Fuxian Lake | N 24°24′52″, E 102°50′17″ | + | 8.74 | 227.5 | 0.17 | ||
| FX03 | Fuxian Lake | N 24°26′26″, E 102°54′7″ | + | + | 8.52 | 228.2 | 0.17 | |
| EH01 | Erhai Lake | N 25°54′1″, E 100°12′8″ | + | 8.90 | 217.7 | 0.16 | ||
| EH02 | Erhai Lake | N 25°55′56″, E 100°8′25″ | + | + | 9.14 | 218.4 | 0.16 | |
| YZ01 | Yangzong Lake | N 24°51′35″, E 102°58′56″ | + | 8.68 | 303.5 | 0.22 | ||
| YZ02 | Yangzong Lake | N 24°52′7″, E 102°58′50″ | + | 8.98 | 297.7 | 0.22 | ||
| XH01 | Xihu Lake | N 26°11′3″, E 100°3′7″ | + | 8.75 | 317.8 | 0.24 | ||
| DT01 | Dadun Lake | N 23°26′4″, E 103°19′27″ | + | + | 8.40 | 409.6 | 0.31 | |
| DT02 | Dadun Lake | N 23°24′60″, E 103°19′14″ | + | + | 8.30 | 409.5 | 0.30 | |
| CQ01 | Changqiao Lake | N 25°25′47″, E 103°23′29″ | + | 8.92 | 302.9 | 0.22 | ||
| DC01 | Dianchi Lake | N 24°58′43″, E 102°37′59″ | + | + | 9.67 | 290.5 | 0.21 | |
| XY01 | Xingyun Lake | N 24°22′42″, E 102°48′27″ | + | + | 9.32 | 481.9 | 0.36 | |
| XY02 | Xingyun Lake | N 24°48′27″, E 102°46′18″ | + | + | 9.35 | 481.0 | 0.36 |
Nutrient and eutrophication levels in the sampling sites in 8 lakes based on TLI evaluation methods.
| Sampling sites | TLI(TN) | TLI(TP) | TLI(chla) | TLI(SD) | w(TN) | w(TP) | w(chla) | w(SD) | total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FX02 | 41.58 | 1.16 | 36.34 | 43.31 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 16.79 |
| FX03 | 36.14 | 14.32 | 36.69 | 47.64 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 17.47 |
| EH02 | 37.18 | 33.31 | 52.00 | 47.64 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 25.44 |
| FX01 | 20.64 | 40.08 | 52.05 | 66.67 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 31.30 |
| EH01 | 49.00 | 43.41 | 51.05 | 51.18 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 32.40 |
| YZ02 | 54.50 | 38.12 | 57.90 | 43.31 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 32.89 |
| EH03 | 49.97 | 48.52 | 59.18 | 42.06 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 34.49 |
| YZ01 | 53.58 | 44.85 | 59.38 | 42.06 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 34.67 |
| XH01 | 63.85 | 56.24 | 75.52 | 65.02 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 58.50 |
| DT02 | 75.87 | 60.94 | 73.01 | 73.29 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 68.72 |
| DT01 | 72.03 | 56.91 | 75.68 | 82.40 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 71.35 |
| CQ01 | 72.10 | 55.54 | 76.57 | 89.32 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 75.37 |
| DC01 | 82.66 | 82.75 | 93.03 | 87.98 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 102.46 |
| XY01 | 92.44 | 92.71 | 97.66 | 87.98 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 117.26 |
| XY02 | 106.63 | 106.87 | 110.83 | 82.40 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 142.62 |
Fig 2Regression between asexual biomass and nutrient levels; sexual biomass and nutrient levels and sexual/vegetative ratios and entrophic levels of three species A: Stuckenia pectinata, B: Myriophyllum spicatum, C: Potamogeton perfoliatus.
Regression analyses between asexual biomass and eutrophic levels; sexual biomass and eutrophic levels and sexual/vegetative ratios and eutrophic levels of three species.
| r2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual biomass | 0.075 | 573.39 | < 0.001 |
| Asexual biomass | 0.645 | 113.03 | < 0.001 |
| Sexual ratio | 0.704 | 256.30 | < 0.001 |
| Asexual ratio | 0.690 | 925.95 | < 0.001 |
| Sexual biomass | 0.918 | 292.95 | < 0.001 |
| Asexual biomass | 0.690 | 58.75 | < 0.001 |
| Sexual/Asexual ratio | 0.814 | 115.06 | < 0.001 |
| Sexual biomass | 0.058 | 0.13 | 0.728 |
| Asexual biomass | 0.052 | 0.21 | 0.652 |
| Sexual/Asexual ratio | 0.039 | 0.40 | 0.538 |
Fig 3Regression between single flower number and nutrient levels; inflorescence number and nutrient levels and seed set and entrophic levels levels of three species A: Stuckenia pectinata, B: Myriophyllum spicatum, C: Potamogeton perfoliatus.
Regression analyses between single flower number and eutrophic levels; inflorescence number and eutrophic levels, and seed set and eutrophic levels of three species.
| r2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Single flower number | 0.501 | 783.55 | < 0.001 |
| Inflorescence number | 0.405 | 44.04 | < 0.001 |
| Seed set | 0.696 | 778.58 | < 0.001 |
| Single flower number | 0.790 | 98.72 | < 0.001 |
| Inflorescence number | 0.819 | 118.53 | < 0.001 |
| Seed set | 0.835 | 132.08 | < 0.001 |
| Single flower number | 0.263 | 6.72 | 0.020 |
| Inflorescence number | 0.429 | 13.02 | 0.003 |
| Seed set | 0.473 | 15.35 | 0.001 |
Fig 4Regression between asexual biomass and nutrient levels; sexual biomass and nutrient levels and sexual/vegetative ratios and environmental variables (TN, TP, Chla and Secchi) of the three species A: Stuckenia pectinata, B: Myriophyllum spicatum, C: Potamogeton perfoliatus.
Regression analyses between asexual/sexual biomass and environmental factors (TN, TP, Chla and Secchi); ratios allocated to asexual/sexual biomass and environmental factors (TN, TP, Chla and Secchi) of three species.
| TN | TP | Chla | Secchi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asexual biomass | 0.147 | < 0.001 | 0.117 | < 0.001 | 0.146 | < 0.001 | -0.019 | < 0.001 |
| Sexual biomass | 0.101 | < 0.001 | 0.072 | < 0.001 | 0.148 | < 0.001 | 0.106 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio allocated to asexual biomass | 0.235 | < 0.001 | 0.292 | < 0.001 | 0.293 | < 0.001 | 0.058 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio allocated to sexual biomass | 0.223 | < 0.001 | 0.3611 | < 0.001 | 0.365 | < 0.001 | 0.047 | < 0.001 |
| Asexual biomass | 0.844 | < 0.001 | 0.895 | < 0.001 | 0.892 | < 0.001 | -0.628 | < 0.001 |
| Sexual biomass | -0.715 | < 0.001 | -0.608 | < 0.001 | -0.638 | < 0.001 | 0.483 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio allocated to asexual biomass | 0.815 | < 0.001 | 0.776 | < 0.001 | 0.800 | < 0.001 | -0.777 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio allocated to sexual biomass | -0.848 | < 0.001 | -0.766 | < 0.001 | -0.800 | < 0.001 | 0.787 | < 0.001 |
| Asexual biomass | -0.059 | < 0.001 | -0.008 | < 0.001 | -0.063 | < 0.001 | -0.062 | < 0.001 |
| Sexual biomass | -0.055 | < 0.001 | -0.048 | < 0.001 | -0.066 | < 0.001 | -0.040 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio allocated to asexual biomass | -0.012 | < 0.001 | -0.045 | < 0.001 | -0.030 | < 0.001 | -0.025 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio allocated to sexual biomass | -0.012 | < 0.001 | -0.045 | < 0.001 | -0.029 | < 0.001 | -0.025 | < 0.001 |
Fig 5Regression between single flower number and nutrient levels; inflorescence number and nutrient levels and seed set and entrophic levels levels of three species A: Stuckenia pectinata, B: Myriophyllum spicatum, C: Potamogeton perfoliatus.
Regression analyses between single flower number and environmental factors (TN, TP, Chla and Secchi); inflorescence number and environmental factors (TN, TP, Chla and Secchi) and seed set and environmental factors (TN, TP, Chla and Secchi) of three species.
| TN | TP | Chla | Secchi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single flower number | 0.7437 | < 0.001 | 0.7951 | < 0.001 | 0.7839 | < 0.001 | 0.6785 | < 0.001 |
| Inflorescence number | 0.7756 | < 0.001 | 0.7491 | < 0.001 | 0.7683 | < 0.001 | 0.6912 | < 0.001 |
| Seed set | 0.8299 | < 0.001 | 0.8027 | < 0.001 | 0.8112 | < 0.001 | 0.5436 | < 0.001 |
| Single flower number | 0.5032 | < 0.001 | 0.5128 | < 0.001 | 0.5550 | < 0.001 | 0.0951 | < 0.001 |
| Inflorescence number | 0.3129 | < 0.001 | 0.2991 | < 0.001 | 0.3140 | < 0.001 | 0.1283 | < 0.001 |
| Seed set | 0.3434 | < 0.001 | 0.1801 | < 0.001 | 0.2711 | < 0.001 | 0.0048 | < 0.001 |
| Single flower number | 0.483 | < 0.001 | 0.085 | < 0.001 | 0.549 | < 0.001 | 0.340 | < 0.001 |
| Inflorescence number | 0.323 | < 0.001 | 0.312 | < 0.001 | 0.516 | < 0.001 | 0.146 | < 0.001 |
| Seed set | 0.221 | < 0.001 | 0.342 | < 0.001 | 0.583 | < 0.001 | 0.049 | < 0.001 |