Literature DB >> 27805473

Are Disease Awareness Links on Prescription Drug Websites Misleading? A Randomized Study.

Helen W Sullivan1, Amie C O'Donoghue1, Douglas J Rupert2, Jessica Fitts Willoughby3, Jacqueline B Amoozegar2, Kathryn J Aikin1.   

Abstract

We sought to determine whether links from branded prescription drug websites to websites containing disease information mislead participants about drug benefits and whether nonsponsorship disclosures diminish this potential effect. We randomly assigned online panelists with depression (N = 1,071) to view a fictitious prescription drug website that had (a) no link to a disease information website (control), (b) a link with no disclosure, (c) a link with a simple nonsponsorship disclosure, or (d) a link with a detailed nonsponsorship disclosure. If participants in the link conditions did not click the link, they were returned to the drug website and encouraged to click it. All participants then completed an online questionnaire assessing recall, perceptions, and intentions. Few participants (12%) clicked the link without prompting; 67% did so when prompted. Compared with control participants, participants in link conditions were more likely to confuse disease information with drug benefits and to recall fewer true drug benefits. Disclosures did not diminish these effects, and exposure to disease information did not affect other perceptions or intentions. Consumers seem to confuse information on disease websites with information on branded prescription drug websites. Disclosures may not adequately help consumers to distinguish between the 2 types of information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27805473      PMCID: PMC7325647          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1237594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  27 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Benefits and harms of direct to consumer advertising: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Gilbody; P Wilson; I Watt
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

3.  The effect of source credibility on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet.

Authors:  Benjamin R Bates; Sharon Romina; Rukhsana Ahmed; Danielle Hopson
Journal:  Med Inform Internet Med       Date:  2006-03

4.  Expediting drug development--the FDA's new "breakthrough therapy" designation.

Authors:  Rachel E Sherman; Jun Li; Stephanie Shapley; Melissa Robb; Janet Woodcock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Randomized trial of risk information formats in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.

Authors:  Kathryn J Aikin; Amie C O'Donoghue; John L Swasy; Helen W Sullivan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Christopher T Robertson; Jessica A Myers; Susannah L Rose; Victoria Gillet; Kathryn M Ross; Robert J Glynn; Steven Joffe; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.

Authors:  Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin; Dhuly Chowdhury; Rebecca R Moultrie; Douglas J Rupert
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-12-25

8.  Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Rachel Kornfield; Julie Donohue; Ernst R Berndt; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trends in utilization of FDA expedited drug development and approval programs, 1987-2014: cohort study.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Bo Wang; Jessica M Franklin; Jonathan J Darrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-23
View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessing the Inclusion of Foil Items in a Scale to Measure Recognition of Health Messages.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Wen-Hung Chen; Kevin R Betts
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2021-07-03

2.  Direct-to-Consumer Promotion of Prescription Drugs on Mobile Devices: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Kathryn J Aikin; Helen W Sullivan; Suzanne Dolina; Molly Lynch; Linda B Squiers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Disease awareness campaigns in printed and online media in Latvia: cross-sectional study on consistency with WHO ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion and European standards.

Authors:  Teresa Leonardo Alves; Elita Poplavska; Signe Mezinska; Ieva Salmane-Kulikovska; Liga Andersone; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Barbara Mintzes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  A Revised Model of Trust in Internet-Based Health Information and Advice: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Sillence; John Matthew Blythe; Pam Briggs; Mark Moss
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.