| Literature DB >> 27805023 |
Jing Zhang1, Zhao Chen2, Lan Yang1, Fang-Fang Pan1, Guang-Ao Yu1, Jun Yin1, Sheng Hua Liu1.
Abstract
The research efforts on oligoacene systems are still relatively limited mainly due to the synthetic challenge and the extreme instability of longer acenes. Herein, these two issues have been overcome through elaborative modification and the stable pentacene species has been successfully synthesized. Additionally, a series of bis(diarylamino) compounds linked by variable-length oligoacene bridges ranging from one to five fused rings (benzene (1a), naphthalene (1b), anthracene (1c), tetracene (1d) and pentacene (1e)) have been prepared to probe the effect of the extent of π-conjugation on the electron transfer properties. Compound 1c exhibits a high planarity between the anthracyl bridge and the two nitrogen cores and the molecular packing shows a two-dimensional herringbone characteristic. Combined studies based on electrochemistry and spectroelectrochemistry demonstrate that (i) the electronic coupling across the oligoacene linkers between two diarylamine termini exponentially decrease with a moderate attenuation constant (β) of 0.14 Å-1 in these length-modulated systems and (ii) the associated radical cations [1a]+-[1e]+ are classified as the class II Robin-Day mixed-valence systems. Furthermore, density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been conducted to gain insight into the nature of electron transfer processes in these oligoacene systems.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27805023 PMCID: PMC5090870 DOI: 10.1038/srep36310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Studied series of bis(diarylamino) compounds 1a–1e bridged by oligoacene ligands.
Figure 2General synthetic routes to bis(diarylamino) oligoacene compounds 1a–1e.
Figure 3(a) Thermal ellipsoid plot of the X-ray structure of 1c at 50% probability. Color scheme: carbon, grey; oxygen, red; nitrogen, blue. (b) Showing possible intermolecular interactions. (c,d) packing diagram of compound 1c. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted in X-ray structure and packing views for clarity.
Electrochemical data for compounds 1a–1e .
| Compound | Δ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | −0.200 | 0.285 | — | 485 | 1.6 × 108 |
| 1b | 0.094 | 0.469 | — | 375 | 2.2 × 106 |
| 1c | 0.138 | 0.433 | — | 295 | 9.7 × 104 |
| 1d | 0.290 | 0.412 | — | 122 | 1.2 × 102 |
| 1e | 0.061 | 0.339 | 0.534 | — | — |
| 2e | 0.490 | — | — | — | — |
The anodic potentials are referenced against the standard ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) redox couple; E1/2 (Fc/Fc+) = +0.43 V vs Ag/AgCl. The comproportionation constants, Kc, were estimated using the expression Kc = exp(ΔE/25.69 mV) at 298 K.
Figure 4UV-Vis-NIR spectral changes recorded during the oxidation 1d → [1]+ (left) and [1]+→ [1]2+ (right) in CH2Cl2/10−1 M n-Bu4NPF6 at 298 K within an OTTLE cell.
Figure 5UV-Vis-NIR spectral changes recorded during the oxidation 1e → [1e]+ (A), [1e]+ → [1e]2+ (B) and [1e]2+ → [1e]3+ (C) in CH2Cl2/10−1 M n-Bu4NPF6 at 298 K within an OTTLE cell.
UV-vis-NIR electronic absorption of compounds 1a–1e and their oxidation products in dichloromethane/n-Bu4NPF6.
| Compound | |
|---|---|
| 1a | 215 (1.77), 311 (1.50) |
| [1a]+ | 220 (1.40), 418 (0.89), 567 (0.37), 1040 (1.00) |
| [1a]2+ | 633 (1.22), 785 (1.89) |
| 1b | 278 (1.55), 347 (1.72) |
| [1b]+ | 274 (1.41), 397 (0.85), 511 (0.72), 603 (0.24), 1305 (1.34) |
| [1b]2+ | 648 (1.08), 851 (7.00) |
| 1c | 246 (2.16), 329 (2.39) |
| [1c]+ | 268 (1.74), 351 (1.42), 413 (0.90), 623 (0.63), 676 (0.60), 1480 (1.40) |
| [1c]2+ | 268 (1.75), 351 (1.00), 623 (0.74), 909 (2.07) |
| 1d | 299 (4.77) |
| [1d]+ | 277 (3.80), 737 (1.97), 988 (0.76), 1865 (0.80) |
| [1d]2+ | 272 (3.62), 357 (2.99), 742 (3.86), 967 (2.08) |
| 1e | 320 (5.03), 507 (2.54), 560 (1.89) |
| [1e]+ | 309 (3.74), 582 (1.53), 699 (1.46), 1613 (1.74) |
| [1e]2+ | 582 (2.51), 753 (2.80), 1218 (2.12), 1961 (0.91) |
| [1e]3+ | 288 (2.30), 368 (2.27), 721 (2.33), 1218 (1.54) |
Parameters from the low-energy NIR absorptions of the radical cations [1a]+–[1e]+.
| [1a]+ | [1b]+ | [1c]+ | [1d]+ | [1e]+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.42 | 7.56 | 9.81 | 12.12 | 14.48 | |
| 9524 (8700) | 7716 (13000) | 6766 (12600) | 10365 (6100) | 9342 (4500) | |
| 3599 | 3091 | 2779 | 3474 | 3703 | |
| Δ | 4690 | 4222 | 3953 | 4893 | 4645 |
| 1.67 | 1.42 | 1.81 | — | — | |
| 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.91 | — | — | |
| 5.62 | 7.11 | 7.02 | — | — | |
| 2061 | 1512 | 1009 | 796 | 561 | |
| 4762 | 3858 | 3383 | — | — |
Evaluated by the DFT-optimized N−N geometrical distance in mono-cationic state. (obs) is the observed half-height bandwidth of IVCT band. From equation (1) at ambient temperature. Ratio of bandwidth on high-energy side to that on low-energy side. Ratio of twice the band on the high-energy side to the calculated bandwidth. Transition dipole moment calculated from the IVCT band using equation (3). The electronic coupling Hab was calculated by using equation (2) for [1a]+–[1c]+ and equation (4) for [1d]+ and [1e]+. From equation (5) using the experimental values of .
Figure 6Deconvolutions of the NIR absorptions of [1d]+ (left) and [1e]+ (right) as recorded during the spectroelectrochemical measurements into Gaussian-shaped bands.
Figure 7Distance dependence plot of ln(Hab) as a function of Rab (Å) from data in Table 3.
The data was fitted to a linear equation with a slope of −0.14 Å−1 and adjusted R2 of 0.995.
Figure 8Selected BLYP35/6-31G*-derived molecular orbital energies and profiles for compounds 1c–1e and corresponding bridge components.
Blue, black and red lines represent LUMO, HOMO and HOMO-1, respectively.