| Literature DB >> 27804980 |
Xu-Jie Zhou1, Swapan K Nath2, Yuan-Yuan Qi1, Celi Sun2, Ping Hou1, Yue-Miao Zhang1, Ji-Cheng Lv1, Su-Fang Shi1, Li-Jun Liu1, Ruoyan Chen3, Wanling Yang3, Kevin Zhi He4, Yanming Li4, Hong Zhang1.
Abstract
Known susceptibility loci together can only explain about 6-8% of the disease heritability of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), suggesting that there are still a large number of genetic variants remained to be discovered. We previously identified IgAN and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)/lupus nephritis (LN) shared many loci based on GWAS on Chinese populations. The more recent study with high-density genotyping of immune-related loci in individuals with Asian ancestry identified 10 new and 6 suggestive loci in SLE. In the current study, we thus included all the lead SNPs from these 16 loci reported, and firstly tested their associations in 1,248 patients with sporadic IgAN, 737 patients with LN and 1,187 controls. Significant associations identified in IgAN were replicated in additional 500 patients and 2372 controls. rs12022418 in RGS1 (p = 3.0 × 10-6) and rs7170151 in RASGRP1 (p = 1.9 × 10-5) showed novel associations in IgAN. Compared to SNPs that were in LD with them, the associated variants showed higher potential of regulatory features by affecting gene expression. And systemic evaluation of GWAS data supported the pleiotropic effects of RGS1 and RASGRP1 variants in mediating human complex diseases. In conclusion, novel risk loci shared between IgAN and SLE/LN were identified, which may shed new light to exploit the potential pathogenesis for those two diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27804980 PMCID: PMC5090199 DOI: 10.1038/srep35781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Association between new SLE risk variants inNorthern Han Chinese with IgA nephropathy or lupus nephritis.
| Chr | SNP | Genes/Loci | dbSNP Annotation | BP (hg19) | Minor allele | MAF control (%) | IgAN | LN | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAF case (%) | P (Ppermutation) | OR | 95% CI of OR | MAF case (%) | P (Ppermutation) | OR | 95% CI of OR | |||||||
| 1 | rs12022418 | 192535106 | C | 31.67 | 36.48 | 1.10–1.40 | 32.57 | 0.58 | 1.04 | 0.90–1.20 | ||||
| 1 | rs7556469 | intronic | 198637581 | G | 14.5 | 15.33 | 0.43 | 1.07 | 0.91–1.26 | 13.28 | 0.31 | 0.90 | 0.74–1.10 | |
| 3 | rs10936599 | synonymous | 169492100 | C | 45.29 | 45.41 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.89–1.13 | 47.26 | 0.25 | 1.08 | 0.95–1.24 | |
| 3 | rs10936600 | missense | 169514584 | A | 45 | 45.15 | 0.92 | 1.01 | 0.87–1.13 | 46.67 | 0.33 | 1.07 | 0.93–1.22 | |
| 5 | rs2736100 | intronic | 1286515 | G | 41 | 39.51 | 0.3 | 0.94 | 0.84–1.06 | 44.28 | 1.14 | 1.00–1.31 | ||
| 5 | rs7726414 | 133431833 | T | 6.36 | 6.38 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.79–1.27 | 8.53 | 1.37 | 1.06–1.76 | |||
| 5 | rs2421184 | intronic | 158886938 | A | 44.26 | 44.22 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.89–1.12 | 47.19 | 0.08 | 1.13 | 0.98–1.29 | |
| 7 | rs11981999 | intronic | 74002082 | A | 34.8 | 32.76 | 0.14 | 0.91 | 0.81–1.03 | 43.91 | 1.47 | 1.28–1.68 | ||
| 7 | rs117026326 | intronic | 74126033 | T | 15.88 | 14.13 | 0.1 | 0.87 | 0.74–1.03 | 31.65 | 2.45 | 2.09–2.88 | ||
| 11 | rs2009453 | intronic | 65399527 | T | 42.97 | 40.09 | 0.05 | 0.89 | 0.79–1.00 | 41.11 | 0.27 | 0.93 | 0.81–1.06 | |
| 11 | rs931127 | 65405299 | A | 43.61 | 40.83 | 0.06 | 0.89 | 0.79–1.00 | 41.41 | 0.19 | 0.91 | 0.80–1.05 | ||
| 11 | rs11235604 | missense | 72533535 | T | 10.31 | 8.68 | 0.06 | 0.83 | 0.68–1.01 | 9.64 | 0.52 | 0.93 | 0.74–1.16 | |
| 11 | rs11235667 | 72863696 | G | 10.47 | 9.03 | 0.1 | 0.85 | 0.70–1.03 | 9.41 | 0.30 | 0.89 | 0.71–1.11 | ||
| 13 | rs1885889 | 100091299 | T | 37.88 | 35.38 | 0.08 | 0.90 | 0.80–1.01 | 38.22 | 0.84 | 1.02 | 0.88–1.16 | ||
| 15 | rs7170151 | intronic | 38846677 | C | 44.47 | 49.39 | 1.09–1.37 | 41.04 | 0.76–0.99 | |||||
| 16 | rs223881 | 57386565 | T | 49.35 | 48.73 | 0.67 | 0.98 | 0.87–1.10 | 51.11 | 0.30 | 1.07 | 0.94–1.23 | ||
| 18 | rs1610555 | intronic | 67543146 | T | 30.48 | 31.86 | 0.31 | 1.07 | 0.94–1.21 | 33.85 | 1.17 | 1.01–1.35 | ||
| 18 | rs1788097 | intronic | 67543687 | T | 33.87 | 35.27 | 0.32 | 1.06 | 0.94–1.20 | 37.26 | 1.16 | 1.01–1.33 | ||
| 19 | rs2305772 | missense | 52033741 | A | 45.29 | 43.74 | 0.29 | 0.94 | 0.84–1.06 | 42.37 | 0.08 | 0.89 | 0.78–1.02 | |
| 22 | rs61616683 | intronic | 39755772 | C | 21.44 | 22.37 | 0.45 | 1.06 | 0.92–1.21 | 18.37 | 0.82 | 0.70–0.98 | ||
CI, confidence interval; Chr, chromosome; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; IgAN, immunoglobulin-A nephropathy; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
OR values were calculated basing on minor alleles for comparison. *Reported OR values for SLE were derived from the meta-analysis data reported and the lead SNPs passing quality control were listed.
Only SNPs in RGS1 and RASGRP1 loci could retain statistically significant after multiple correction, which were marked in bold.
Ppermutation values based on 10000 permutations.
Figure 1Independent genetic associations of RGS1 and RASGRP1 variants in IgA nephropathy.
| Chr | SNP | IgAN discovery | IgAN replication | IgAN in total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAF case/control (%) | P | OR | 95% CI of OR | MAF case/control (%) | P | OR | 95% CI of OR | P | OR | 95% CI of OR | ||
| 1 | rs12022418 | 36.48/31.67 | 1.10–1.40 | 37.00/32.13 | 2.88 × | 1.15 | 1.05–1.26 | 3.00 × | 1.23 | 1.13–1.34 | ||
| 15 | rs7170151 | 49.39/44.47 | 1.09–1.37 | 49.80/45.27 | 1.05–1.38 | 1.90 × | 1.20 | 1.10–1.30 | ||||
Discovery cohort: 1,248 patients with sporadic IgAN, and 1,187 controls.
Replication cohort: 500 patients with sporadic IgAN, and 2,372 controls.
Figure 2