Hayley Bennett1, Jason Gordon2,3, Beverley Jones2, Thomas Ward2, Samantha Webster2, Anupama Kalsekar4, Yong Yuan4, Michael Brenner5, Phil McEwan2,6. 1. HEOR, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, 9 Oak Tree Court, Mulberry Drive, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS, UK. hayley.bennettwilton@heor.co.uk. 2. HEOR, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, 9 Oak Tree Court, Mulberry Drive, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS, UK. 3. Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 4. World Wide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Princeton, USA. 5. UK HEOR, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, UK. 6. School of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment can reduce the incidence of future infections through removing opportunities for onward transmission. This benefit is not captured in conventional cost-effectiveness evaluations of treatment and is particularly relevant in patient groups with a high risk of transmission, such as those people who inject drugs (PWID), where the treatment rates have been historically low. This study aimed to quantify how reduced HCV transmission changes the cost-effectiveness of new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens as a function of treatment uptake rates. METHODS: An established model of HCV disease transmission and progression was used to quantify the impact of treatment uptake (10-100%), within the PWID population, on the cost-effectiveness of a DAA regimen versus pre-DAA standard of care, conducted using daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir in the UK setting as an illustrative example. RESULTS: The consequences of reduced disease transmission due to treatment were associated with additional net monetary benefit of £24,304-£90,559 per patient treated at £20,000/QALY, when 10-100% of eligible patients receive treatment with 100% efficacy. Dependent on patient genotype, the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment using daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir improved by 36-79% versus conventional analysis, at 10-100% treatment uptake in the PWID population. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment was shown to improve as more patients are treated, suggesting that the value of DAA regimens to the NHS could be enhanced by improved treatment uptake rates among PWID. However, the challenge for the future will lie in achieving increased rates of treatment uptake, particularly in the PWID population.
BACKGROUND:Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment can reduce the incidence of future infections through removing opportunities for onward transmission. This benefit is not captured in conventional cost-effectiveness evaluations of treatment and is particularly relevant in patient groups with a high risk of transmission, such as those people who inject drugs (PWID), where the treatment rates have been historically low. This study aimed to quantify how reduced HCV transmission changes the cost-effectiveness of new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens as a function of treatment uptake rates. METHODS: An established model of HCV disease transmission and progression was used to quantify the impact of treatment uptake (10-100%), within the PWID population, on the cost-effectiveness of a DAA regimen versus pre-DAA standard of care, conducted using daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir in the UK setting as an illustrative example. RESULTS: The consequences of reduced disease transmission due to treatment were associated with additional net monetary benefit of £24,304-£90,559 per patient treated at £20,000/QALY, when 10-100% of eligible patients receive treatment with 100% efficacy. Dependent on patient genotype, the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment using daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir improved by 36-79% versus conventional analysis, at 10-100% treatment uptake in the PWID population. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment was shown to improve as more patients are treated, suggesting that the value of DAA regimens to the NHS could be enhanced by improved treatment uptake rates among PWID. However, the challenge for the future will lie in achieving increased rates of treatment uptake, particularly in the PWID population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost-effectiveness; Disease transmission; Hepatitis C virus; PWID
Authors: Stuart C Gordon; Paul J Pockros; Norah A Terrault; Robert S Hoop; Ami Buikema; David Nerenz; Fayez M Hamzeh Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jo Kimber; Lorraine Copeland; Matthew Hickman; John Macleod; James McKenzie; Daniela De Angelis; James Roy Robertson Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-07-01
Authors: Eric Lawitz; Alessandra Mangia; David Wyles; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; Tarek Hassanein; Stuart C Gordon; Michael Schultz; Mitchell N Davis; Zeid Kayali; K Rajender Reddy; Ira M Jacobson; Kris V Kowdley; Lisa Nyberg; G Mani Subramanian; Robert H Hyland; Sarah Arterburn; Deyuan Jiang; John McNally; Diana Brainard; William T Symonds; John G McHutchison; Aasim M Sheikh; Zobair Younossi; Edward J Gane Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephanos J Hadziyannis; Hoel Sette; Timothy R Morgan; Vijayan Balan; Moises Diago; Patrick Marcellin; Giuliano Ramadori; Henry Bodenheimer; David Bernstein; Mario Rizzetto; Stefan Zeuzem; Paul J Pockros; Amy Lin; Andrew M Ackrill Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-03-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mark S Sulkowski; David F Gardiner; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; K Rajender Reddy; Tarek Hassanein; Ira Jacobson; Eric Lawitz; Anna S Lok; Federico Hinestrosa; Paul J Thuluvath; Howard Schwartz; David R Nelson; Gregory T Everson; Timothy Eley; Megan Wind-Rotolo; Shu-Pang Huang; Min Gao; Dennis Hernandez; Fiona McPhee; Diane Sherman; Robert Hindes; William Symonds; Claudio Pasquinelli; Dennis M Grasela Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245