Literature DB >> 27803973

Thermal implications of interactions between insulation, solar reflectance, and fur structure in the summer coats of diverse species of kangaroo.

Terence J Dawson1, Shane K Maloney2.   

Abstract

Not all of the solar radiation that impinges on a mammalian coat is absorbed and converted into thermal energy at the coat surface. Some is reflected back to the environment, while another portion is reflected further into the coat where it is absorbed and manifested as heat at differing levels. Substantial insulation in a coat limits the thermal impact at the skin of solar radiation, irrespective where in the coat it is absorbed. In coats with low insulation, the zone where solar radiation is absorbed may govern the consequent heat load on the skin (HL-SR). Thin summer furs of four species of kangaroo from differing climatic zones were used to determine how variation in insulation and in coat spectral and structural characteristics influence the HL-SR. Coat depth, structure, and solar reflectance varied between body regions, as well as between species. The modulation of solar radiation and resultant heat flows in these coats were measured at low (1 m s-1) and high (6 m s-1) wind speeds by mounting them on a heat flux transducer/temperature-controlled plate apparatus in a wind tunnel. A lamp with a spectrum similar to solar radiation was used as a proxy for the sun. We established that coat insulation was largely determined by coat depth at natural fur lie, despite large variations in fibre density, fibre diameter, and fur mass. Higher wind speed decreased coat insulation, but depth still determined the overall level. A multiple regression analysis that included coat depth (insulation), fibre diameter, fibre density, and solar reflectance was used to determine the best predictors of HL-SR. Only depth and reflectance had significant impacts and both factors had negative weights, so, as either insulation or reflectance increased, HL-SR declined, the larger impact coming from coat reflectance. This reverses the pattern observed in deep coats where insulation dominates over effects of reflectance. Across all coats, as insulation declined, reflectance increased. An increase in reflectance in the thinnest coats was not the sole reason for the limited rise in HL-SR. Higher reflectance should increase the depth of penetrance of solar radiation, thus increasing HL-SR. But in M. antilopinus and Macropus rufus, which had the highest of coat reflectances, penetrance was relatively shallow. This effect appears due to high fibre density (M. rufus) and major modifications in the fibre structure (M. antilopinus). The differing adaptations likely relate to the habitats of these species, desert in the case of M. rufus and monsoon tropical woodland with M. antilopinus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fur characteristics; Insulation; Kangaroos; Reflectance; Solar radiation; Thermoregulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803973     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-016-1043-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  15 in total

1.  Thermal properties of fur.

Authors:  H T HAMMEL
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1955-08

2.  Body insulation of some arctic and tropical mammals and birds.

Authors:  P F SCHOLANDER; V WALTERS; R HOCK; L IRVING
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 1.818

3.  Adaptation to cold in arctic and tropical mammals and birds in relation to body temperature, insulation, and basal metabolic rate.

Authors:  P F SCHOLANDER; R HOCK; V WALTERS; L IRVING
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 1.818

4.  Heat regulation in some arctic and tropical mammals and birds.

Authors:  P F SCHOLANDER; R HOCK; V WALTERS; F JOHNSON; L IRVING
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 1.818

5.  Minimum daily core body temperature in western grey kangaroos decreases as summer advances: a seasonal pattern, or a direct response to water, heat or energy supply?

Authors:  Shane K Maloney; Andrea Fuller; Leith C R Meyer; Peter R Kamerman; Graham Mitchell; Duncan Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Sweating in the kangaroo: a cooling mechanism during exercise, but not in the heat.

Authors:  T J Dawson; D Robertshaw; C R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1974-08

7.  Penetrance of cattle coats by radiation.

Authors:  J C Hutchinson; G D Brown
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 3.531

8.  Thermoregulation by kangaroos from mesic and arid habitats: influence of temperature on routes of heat loss in eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) and red kangaroos (Macropus rufus).

Authors:  T J Dawson; C E Blaney; A J Munn; A Krockenberger; S K Maloney
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.247

9.  The fur of mammals in exposed environments; do crypsis and thermal needs necessarily conflict? The polar bear and marsupial koala compared.

Authors:  Terence J Dawson; Koa N Webster; Shane K Maloney
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Dehydration, with and without heat, in kangaroos from mesic and arid habitats: different thermal responses including varying patterns in heterothermy in the field and laboratory.

Authors:  Terence J Dawson; Cyntina E Blaney; Hugh C K McCarron; Shane K Maloney
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 2.200

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Design principles of hair-like structures as biological machines.

Authors:  Madeleine Seale; Cathal Cummins; Ignazio Maria Viola; Enrico Mastropaolo; Naomi Nakayama
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.118

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.