| Literature DB >> 27803846 |
T Fikret Kurnaz1, Ugur Dagdeviren2, Murat Yildiz3, Ozhan Ozkan3.
Abstract
The compression index and recompression index are one of the important compressibility parameters to determine the settlement calculation for fine-grained soil layers. These parameters can be determined by carrying out laboratory oedometer test on undisturbed samples; however, the test is quite time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, many empirical formulas based on regression analysis have been presented to estimate the compressibility parameters using soil index properties. In this paper, an artificial neural network (ANN) model is suggested for prediction of compressibility parameters from basic soil properties. For this purpose, the input parameters are selected as the natural water content, initial void ratio, liquid limit and plasticity index. In this model, two output parameters, including compression index and recompression index, are predicted in a combined network structure. As the result of the study, proposed ANN model is successful for the prediction of the compression index, however the predicted recompression index values are not satisfying compared to the compression index.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial neural network; Compressibility; Compression index; Consolidation; Recompression index
Year: 2016 PMID: 27803846 PMCID: PMC5069214 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3494-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Definition of Cc and Cr from compression curve
Descriptive statistics of parameters
| wn | LL | PI | e0 | Cc | Cr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Least | 16.3 | 26.3 | 9.0 | 0.460 | 0.070 | 0.011 |
| Most | 72.0 | 99.6 | 77.8 | 1.888 | 0.833 | 0.164 |
| Mean | 33.1 | 51.8 | 30.0 | 0.949 | 0.286 | 0.051 |
| SD | 11.3 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 0.313 | 0.150 | 0.031 |
Fig. 2The relationships between compressibility and index parameters of the samples; a natural water content (wn) and Cr or Cc, b liquid limit (LL) and Cr or Cc, c plasticity index (PI) and Cr or Cc, d void ratio (e0) and Cr or Cc
Fig. 3A sample structure of ANN
Fig. 4The optimization of the number of neurons in the hidden layer
Fig. 5The architecture of the ANN model used for estimating Cc and Cr
Fig. 6Error histogram
Fig. 7Simulation results; a training results of the Cc values for the proposed ANN model, b test results of the Cc values for the proposed ANN model, c training results of the Cr values for the proposed ANN model, d test results of the Cr values for the proposed ANN model
Fig. 8Comparison between the predicted and measured compression index (a) and recompression index (b)