Literature DB >> 27803395

Widening the concept of oncogene.

Sergio Casas-Tintó1, Marta Portela1, Alberto Ferrús1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell mechanics; metabolism; oncogenes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803395      PMCID: PMC5115887          DOI: 10.18632/aging.101111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


× No keyword cloud information.
As genomic cancer data bases and experimental studies progress, some genes reveal unsuspected roles in oncogenesis. We provide here a short survey on some key examples to illustrate the need to reconsider our current definition of oncogene. As age advances, somatic mutations in metabolic, signaling or regulation of apoptosis may trigger tumorigenesis, in particular if affecting damaged or precancerous cells. Decreasing mitochondrial respiration enhances glycoly-sis triggering the “Warburg effect”. The Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1) converts isocitrate to 2-oxoglutarate. Somatic mutations in cytoplasmic IDH1 and mitochondrial IDH2 are common early drivers in glioma and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) [1], being most frequent in diffuse gliomas and secondary glioblastoma [2]. In a similar context, mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes (RC) catalyze a cascade of oxidation reactions to generate ATP. Mutations in RC complexes I and II are frequent in cancer cells, where they contribute to form reactive oxygen species which result fatal for the cell. In addition, mutations in RC components prevent the apoptosis of tumoral cells and represent bad prognosis markers in cancer [3]. Kinases activation can be the primary event during oncogenesis or a secondary event as recipient of oncogenic signaling. Tyrosine kinases (EGFR, PDGFR or Src) and serine-threonine kinases (Raf or Akt) are well characterized and lead to cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis. However, among the family of kinases directly involved in cancer, some are not yet considered canonical oncogenes. For example, the apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), a MAP kinase-kinase-kinase implicated in apoptosis, inflammation, proliferation and migration, activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 and is clearly related to tumorigenesis in liver, skin, melanoma and colon cancers [4]. While these metabolic and signaling proteins could easily be accepted as new members of the oncogene class, others are unsuspected arrivals. During recent years some muscular proteins have been related to cell proliferation and oncogenic transformation. The myocyte enhancer transcription factor 2 (Mef2) synergizes with Notch to stimulate proliferation and metastasis [5]. The Troponin-Tropomyosin complex regulates muscle contraction through the acto-myosin interaction, however, we have recently described that Troponin I (TnI) is frequently mutated in human cancer and cooperates with other oncogenes to increaser cell proliferation [6]. TnI overexpression enhances PI3K pathway activity and it is necessary for tumorous growth. SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) is a conserved multifunctional extracellular matrix glycoprotein. Its expression is altered in cancer, but its effects on tumor growth are still poorly understood because SPARC seems to restrict, as well as to promote, tumor growth and metastasis. Cell competition is a process that maintains tissue health and delays aging by culling suboptimal cells. Drosophila SPARC is expressed in epithelial loser cells during competition protecting them from apoptosis. This, allows damaged cells to recover before being eliminated by their neighbors [7]. Presumably, SPARC could act as a tumor suppressor, tumor promoter or pro-invasive factor. For example: overexpression of SPARC modulates de equilibrium between cell growth and apoptosis in neuroectodermal and medulloblastoma cells. SPARC suppresses glioma proliferation in vitro and delays brain tumor growth in vivo. SPARC overexpression increases AKT phosphorylation, which is important for the antiapoptotic role, and it interacts with procaspase-8 to stimulate apoptosis which results in the potentiation of chemotherapy sensitivity in colorectal cancers [8]. Thus, it may seem appropriate to revise our current definition of oncogene in order to accommodate a growing number of gene functions that clearly synergize other classical oncogenes and that manifest as frequent mutations and bad prognosis markers in many types of tumors. In this way, an extended number of potential targets for cancer therapy will become available.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes: apoptosis sensors mutated in cancer?

Authors:  A Lemarie; S Grimm
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the divergent roles of SPARC in human carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju; Ranadheer Dontula; Bassel F El-Rayes; Sajani S Lakka
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Regulation of cancer cell metabolism.

Authors:  Rob A Cairns; Isaac S Harris; Tak W Mak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Drosophila SPARC is a self-protective signal expressed by loser cells during cell competition.

Authors:  Marta Portela; Sergio Casas-Tinto; Christa Rhiner; Jesús M López-Gay; Orlando Domínguez; Davide Soldini; Eduardo Moreno
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 12.270

5.  Notch and Mef2 synergize to promote proliferation and metastasis through JNK signal activation in Drosophila.

Authors:  S K Pallavi; Diana M Ho; Chindo Hicks; Lucio Miele; Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Troponin-I enhances and is required for oncogenic overgrowth.

Authors:  Sergio Casas-Tintó; Antonio Maraver; Manuel Serrano; Alberto Ferrús
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-16

7.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas.

Authors:  Hai Yan; D Williams Parsons; Genglin Jin; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Weishi Yuan; Ivan Kos; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Siân Jones; Gregory J Riggins; Henry Friedman; Allan Friedman; David Reardon; James Herndon; Kenneth W Kinzler; Victor E Velculescu; Bert Vogelstein; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 176.079

Review 8.  Therapeutic targets in the ASK1-dependent stress signaling pathways.

Authors:  Ryoichi Hayakawa; Teruyuki Hayakawa; Kohsuke Takeda; Hidenori Ichijo
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.493

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Circadian Gene cry Controls Tumorigenesis through Modulation of Myc Accumulation in Glioblastoma Cells.

Authors:  Patricia Jarabo; Carmen de Pablo; Amanda González-Blanco; Sergio Casas-Tintó
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.