Literature DB >> 27803388

Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity.

Rhiannon M David1, Ann T Doherty2.   

Abstract

Viral vector use in gene therapy has highlighted several safety concerns, including genotoxic events. Generally, vector-mediated genotoxicity results from upregulation of cellular proto-oncogenes via promoter insertion, promoter activation, or gene transcript truncation, with enhancer-mediated activation of nearby genes the primary mechanism reported in gene therapy trials. Vector-mediated genotoxicity can be influenced by virus type, integration target site, and target cell type; different vectors have distinct integration profiles which are cell-specific. Non-viral factors, including patient age, disease, and dose can also influence genotoxic potential, thus the choice of test models and clinical trial populations is important to ensure they are indicative of efficacy and safety. Efforts have been made to develop viral vectors with less risk of insertional mutagenesis, including self-inactivating (SIN) vectors, enhancer-blocking insulators, and microRNA targeting of vectors, although insertional mutagenesis is not completely abrogated. Here we provide an overview of the current understanding of viral vector-mediated genotoxicity risk from factors contributing to viral vector-mediated genotoxicity to efforts made to reduce genotoxicity, and testing strategies required to adequately assess the risk of insertional mutagenesis. It is clear that there is not a 'one size fits all' approach to vector modification for reducing genotoxicity, and addressing these challenges will be a key step in the development of therapies such as CRISPR-Cas9 and delivery of future gene-editing technologies.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gene therapy; mutagenesis.; viral vector

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803388     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  38 in total

1.  High level of fetal-globin reactivation by designed transcriptional activator-like effector.

Authors:  Jun Zhan; Maria Johnson Irudayam; Yukio Nakamura; Ryo Kurita; Arthur W Nienhuis
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-02-25

Review 2.  Progress of cationic gene delivery reagents for non-viral vector.

Authors:  Kai Ma; Chun-Liu Mi; Xiang-Xiang Cao; Tian-Yun Wang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Hepatotoxicity and Toxicology of In Vivo Lentiviral Vector Administration in Healthy and Liver-Injury Mouse Models.

Authors:  Robert Allen Kaiser; Clara Teresa Nicolas; Kari Lynn Allen; Jennifer Anne Chilton; Zeji Du; Raymond Daniel Hickey; Joseph Benjamin Lillegard
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.032

4.  HIV- 1 lentivirus tethering to the genome is associated with transcription factor binding sites found in genes that favour virus survival.

Authors:  Saqlain Suleman; Annette Payne; Johnathan Bowden; Sharmin Al Haque; Marco Zahn; Serena Fawaz; Mohammad S Khalifa; Susan Jobling; David Hay; Matteo Franco; Raffaele Fronza; Wei Wang; Olga Strobel-Freidekind; Annette Deichmann; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Simon N Waddington; Irene Gil-Farina; Manfred Schmidt; Michael Themis
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Dendritic peptide-conjugated polymeric nanovectors for non-toxic delivery of plasmid DNA and enhanced non-viral transfection of immune cells.

Authors:  Sijia Yi; Sun-Young Kim; Michael P Vincent; Simseok A Yuk; Sharan Bobbala; Fanfan Du; Evan Alexander Scott
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-08

6.  Duplex of Polyamidoamine Dendrimer/Custom-Designed Nuclear-Localization Sequence Peptide for Enhanced Gene Delivery.

Authors:  Remy C Cooper; Hu Yang
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2020-06-17

7.  Liver-directed gene therapy for murine glycogen storage disease type Ib.

Authors:  Joon Hyun Kwon; Young Mok Lee; Jun-Ho Cho; Goo-Young Kim; Javier Anduaga; Matthew F Starost; Brian C Mansfield; Janice Y Chou
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  Plant Viruses and Bacteriophage-Based Reagents for Diagnosis and Therapy.

Authors:  Sourabh Shukla; He Hu; Hui Cai; Soo-Khim Chan; Christine E Boone; Veronique Beiss; Paul L Chariou; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 10.431

9.  A ribonucleoprotein transfection strategy for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing and single cell cloning in rainbow trout cells.

Authors:  Marina Zoppo; Nicole Okoniewski; Stanislav Pantelyushin; Johannes Vom Berg; Kristin Schirmer
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 7.133

Review 10.  Cell and Gene Therapy for Anemia: Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Gene Editing.

Authors:  Dito Anurogo; Nova Yuli Prasetyo Budi; Mai-Huong Thi Ngo; Yen-Hua Huang; Jeanne Adiwinata Pawitan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.