Literature DB >> 27803230

Randomised sham-controlled double-blind multicentre clinical trial to ascertain the effect of percutaneous radiofrequency treatment for lumbar facet joint pain.

C W J van Tilburg1, D L Stronks2, J G Groeneweg2, F J P M Huygen2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a percutaneous radiofrequency heat lesion at the medial branch of the primary dorsal ramus with a sham procedure, for the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomised sham-controlled double blind multicentre trial was carried out at the multidisciplinary pain centres of two hospitals. A total of 60 patients aged > 18 years with a history and physical examination suggestive of facet joint pain and a decrease of ≥ 2 on a numerical rating scale (NRS 0 to 10) after a diagnostic facet joint test block were included. In the treatment group, a percutaneous radiofrequency heat lesion (80oC during 60 seconds per level) was applied to the medial branch of the primary dorsal ramus. In the sham group, the same procedure was undertaken without for the radiofrequency lesion. Both groups also received a graded activity physiotherapy programme. The primary outcome measure was decrease in pain. A secondary outcome measure was the Global Perceived Effect scale (GPE).
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant effect on the level of pain in the factor Period (T0-T1). However, there was no statistically significant difference with the passage of time between the groups (Group × Period) or in the factor Group. In the crossover group, 11 of 19 patients had a decrease in NRS of ≥ 2 at one month crossover (p = 0.65). There was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction with the passage of time between the groups (Group × Period). The independent factors Group and Period also showed no statistically significant difference. There was no statistically significant Group × Period effect for recovery, neither an effect of Group or of Period.
CONCLUSION: The null hypothesis of no difference in the decrease in pain and in GPE between the treatment and sham groups cannot be rejected. Post hoc analysis revealed that the age of the patients and the severity of the initial pain significantly predicted a positive outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1526-33. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facet joint; Low back pain; Mechanical low back pain; Radiofrequency; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803230     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0379.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  11 in total

1.  Osteoarthritis: Nerve ablation - a new treatment for OA pain?

Authors:  David A Walsh
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  What is new in pain modification in osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Joel A Block; Anne-Marie Malfait
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  The Application of Radiofrequency Waves in Supportive Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  M Pihut; M Górnicki; M Orczykowska; E Zarzecka; W Ryniewicz; A Gala
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Radiofrequency neurotomy in chronic lumbar and sacroiliac joint pain: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chia-Hsien Chen; Pei-Wei Weng; Lien-Chen Wu; Yueh-Feng Chiang; Chang-Jung Chiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Efficacy of Radiofrequency Neurotomy in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh N Janapala; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Mahendra R Sanapati; Srinivasa Thota; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Alan D Kaye; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 7.  Placebo Effect of Sham Spine Procedures in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ammer M Jamjoom; Rothaina J Saeedi; Abdulhakim B Jamjoom
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  The reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials: The switch and the spin.

Authors:  M Ghert
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary Elizabeth Chappell; Raj Lakshman; Patrick Trotter; Mark Abrahams; Michael Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Magnitude, response, and psychological determinants of placebo effects in chronic low-back pain: a randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial.

Authors:  Damien Finniss; Michael Nicholas; Charles Brooker; Michael Cousins; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.