Literature DB >> 27803217

What is the lifetime risk of revision for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? a 40-year observational study of patients treated with the Charnley cemented total hip arthroplasty.

M P Abdel1, P von Roth2, W S Harmsen1, D J Berry1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine the lifetime risk of revision surgery for patients undergoing Charnley cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), with 40-year follow up, using death as a competing risk.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2000 cemented Charnley THAs, with 51 living hips available at 40 years.
RESULTS: The cumulative risk of revision or removal for any reason was 13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12 to 15). Patients aged under 50 years at the time of surgery had a 35% (95% CI 28 to 42) risk of revision or removal for any reason (Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.6; 95% CI 2.5 to 5.2; p < 0.001), patients 50 to 59 years old had a 20% risk (95% CI 16 to 24) (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5 to 2.8; p < 0.0001), patients aged 60 to 69 years had a 9% risk (95% CI 7 to 11) (reference point), and patients ≥ 70 years old had a 5% risk (95% CI 4 to 7) (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.5; p = 0.86) during their lifetime. Men had a higher risk of revision or removal for any reason (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.7; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: With almost all the patients in this series followed up till either death or revision, we have been able to develop a 'rule of thumb' for lifetime likelihood of revision or implant removal for the Charnley THA: one in three for patients < 50 years, one in five for patients 50 to 59 years, one in ten for patients 60 to 69 years, and one in 20 for patients ≥ 70 years. The results provide a benchmark for comparison of outcomes, for the newer designs of THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1436-40. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charnley; Follow-up report; Survivorship; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803217     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0337.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  8 in total

1.  Do Patients Live Longer After THA and Is the Relative Survival Diagnosis-specific?

Authors:  Peter Cnudde; Ola Rolfson; A John Timperley; Anne Garland; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Szilard Nemes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Trends in hip replacements between 1999 and 2012 in Sweden.

Authors:  Peter Cnudde; Szilard Nemes; Erik Bülow; John Timperley; Henrik Malchau; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The risk of developing cancer following metal-on-metal hip replacement compared with non metal-on-metal hip bearings: Findings from a prospective national registry "The National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man".

Authors:  Linda P Hunt; Ashley W Blom; Gulraj S Matharu; Martyn L Porter; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Risk of further surgery on the same or opposite side and mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty: A multi-state analysis of 133,654 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Peter H J Cnudde; Szilard Nemes; Erik Bülow; A John Timperley; Sarah L Whitehouse; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Short-term success of proximal bone stock preservation in short hip stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sheryl de Waard; Jacqueline van der Vis; Pascale A H T Venema; Inger N Sierevelt; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

6.  A Scoping Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Survival and Reoperation Rates in Patients of 55 Years or Younger: Health Services Implications for Revision Surgeries.

Authors:  Ahmed M Negm; Lauren A Beaupre; C Michael Goplen; Colleen Weeks; C Allyson Jones
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-07-19

7.  Long-term survival after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty for treatment of acute femoral neck fracture: a retrospective study with a mean 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Meiji Chen; Weiguang Yu; Xiulan Han; Junxing Ye; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Charnley femoral cemented stem with a permeable and resorbable cement restrictor and low-viscosity cement - Clinical and radiographical evaluation of 100 cases at a mean follow-up of 6.55 years.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Prudhon; Jacques H Caton; Thierry Aslanian
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2019-11-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.