Ben Carter1, Philippa Rees2, Lauren Hale3, Darsharna Bhattacharjee4, Mandar S Paradkar5. 1. Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England2Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, Wales3Cochrane Skin Group, Centre for Evidence Based Dermatology, The University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, England. 2. Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, Wales4Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, England. 3. Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine Program in Public Health, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York. 4. Department of General Paediatrics, Child Health Offices, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. 5. Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, Wales7Johns Hopkins Center for Clinical Global Health Education, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore-Washington-India Clinical Trials, B. J. Medical College, Pune, India.
Abstract
Importance: Sleep is vital to children's biopsychosocial development. Inadequate sleep quantity and quality is a public health concern with an array of detrimental health outcomes. Portable mobile and media devices have become a ubiquitous part of children's lives and may affect their sleep duration and quality. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether there is an association between portable screen-based media device (eg, cell phones and tablet devices) access or use in the sleep environment and sleep outcomes. Data Sources: A search strategy consisting of gray literature and 24 Medical Subject Headings was developed in Ovid MEDLINE and adapted for other databases between January 1, 2011, and June 15, 2015. Searches of the published literature were conducted across 12 databases. No language restriction was applied. Study Selection: The analysis included randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional study designs. Inclusion criteria were studies of school-age children between 6 and 19 years. Exclusion criteria were studies of stationary exposures, such as televisions or desktop or personal computers, or studies investigating electromagnetic radiation. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Of 467 studies identified, 20 cross-sectional studies were assessed for methodological quality. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were inadequate sleep quantity, poor sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness, studied according to an a priori protocol. Results: Twenty studies were included, and their quality was assessed. The studies involved 125 198 children (mean [SD] age, 14.5 [2.2] years; 50.1% male). There was a strong and consistent association between bedtime media device use and inadequate sleep quantity (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.42-3.32) (P < .001, I2 = 90%), poor sleep quality (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14-1.88) (P = .003, I2 = 76%), and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.32-5.61) (P = .007, I2 = 50%). In addition, children who had access to (but did not use) media devices at night were more likely to have inadequate sleep quantity (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.39-2.31) (P < .001, I2 = 64%), poor sleep quality (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11-2.10) (P = .009, I2 = 74%), and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.54-3.35) (P < .001, I2 = 24%). Conclusions and Relevance: To date, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of access to and the use of media devices with sleep outcomes. Bedtime access to and use of a media device were significantly associated with the following: inadequate sleep quantity, poor sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness. An integrated approach among teachers, health care professionals, and parents is required to minimize device access at bedtime, and future research is needed to evaluate the influence of the devices on sleep hygiene and outcomes.
Importance: Sleep is vital to children's biopsychosocial development. Inadequate sleep quantity and quality is a public health concern with an array of detrimental health outcomes. Portable mobile and media devices have become a ubiquitous part of children's lives and may affect their sleep duration and quality. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether there is an association between portable screen-based media device (eg, cell phones and tablet devices) access or use in the sleep environment and sleep outcomes. Data Sources: A search strategy consisting of gray literature and 24 Medical Subject Headings was developed in Ovid MEDLINE and adapted for other databases between January 1, 2011, and June 15, 2015. Searches of the published literature were conducted across 12 databases. No language restriction was applied. Study Selection: The analysis included randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional study designs. Inclusion criteria were studies of school-age children between 6 and 19 years. Exclusion criteria were studies of stationary exposures, such as televisions or desktop or personal computers, or studies investigating electromagnetic radiation. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Of 467 studies identified, 20 cross-sectional studies were assessed for methodological quality. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were inadequate sleep quantity, poor sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness, studied according to an a priori protocol. Results: Twenty studies were included, and their quality was assessed. The studies involved 125 198 children (mean [SD] age, 14.5 [2.2] years; 50.1% male). There was a strong and consistent association between bedtime media device use and inadequate sleep quantity (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.42-3.32) (P < .001, I2 = 90%), poor sleep quality (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14-1.88) (P = .003, I2 = 76%), and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.32-5.61) (P = .007, I2 = 50%). In addition, children who had access to (but did not use) media devices at night were more likely to have inadequate sleep quantity (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.39-2.31) (P < .001, I2 = 64%), poor sleep quality (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11-2.10) (P = .009, I2 = 74%), and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.54-3.35) (P < .001, I2 = 24%). Conclusions and Relevance: To date, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of access to and the use of media devices with sleep outcomes. Bedtime access to and use of a media device were significantly associated with the following: inadequate sleep quantity, poor sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness. An integrated approach among teachers, health care professionals, and parents is required to minimize device access at bedtime, and future research is needed to evaluate the influence of the devices on sleep hygiene and outcomes.
Authors: Reut Gruber; Normand Carrey; Shelly K Weiss; Jean Yves Frappier; Leslie Rourke; Robert T Brouillette; Merrill S Wise Journal: J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-09
Authors: Anne-Marie Chang; Daniel Aeschbach; Jeanne F Duffy; Charles A Czeisler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jennifer Falbe; Kirsten K Davison; Rebecca L Franckle; Claudia Ganter; Steven L Gortmaker; Lauren Smith; Thomas Land; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Delphine Pieters; Elke De Valck; Marie Vandekerckhove; Sandra Pirrera; Johan Wuyts; Vasileios Exadaktylos; Bart Haex; Nina Michiels; Johan Verbraecken; Raymond Cluydts Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 2.964
Authors: James E Gangwisch; Lindsay A Babiss; Dolores Malaspina; J Blake Turner; Gary K Zammit; Kelly Posner Journal: Sleep Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Anna M Adachi-Mejia; Patricia M Edwards; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Glen P Greenough; Ardis L Olson Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2014 Oct-Dec
Authors: Yim Wah Mak; Cynthia Sau Ting Wu; Donna Wing Shun Hui; Siu Ping Lam; Hei Yin Tse; Wing Yan Yu; Ho Ting Wong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Darlynn M Rojo-Wissar; Jocelynn T Owusu; Casandra Nyhuis; Chandra L Jackson; Jacek K Urbanek; Adam P Spira Journal: Sleep Health Date: 2020-01-21
Authors: Jonathan A Mitchell; Knashawn H Morales; Ariel A Williamson; Nicholas Huffnagle; Allison Ludwick; Struan F A Grant; David F Dinges; Babette A Zemel Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Timothy Matthews; Andrea Danese; Avshalom Caspi; Helen L Fisher; Sidra Goldman-Mellor; Agnieszka Kepa; Terrie E Moffitt; Candice L Odgers; Louise Arseneault Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Lauren Hale; Gregory W Kirschen; Monique K LeBourgeois; Michael Gradisar; Michelle M Garrison; Hawley Montgomery-Downs; Howard Kirschen; Susan M McHale; Anne-Marie Chang; Orfeu M Buxton Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am Date: 2018-04
Authors: Charles T Wood; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; Jane D Brown; Callie L Brown; Janna B Howard; Michael J Steiner; Andrew J Perrin; Cary Levine; Sophie N Ravanbakht; Eliana M Perrin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Susan K Riesch; Jianghong Liu; Peter G Kaufmann; Willa M Doswell; Sally Cohen; Judith Vessey Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2019 Jul - Aug Impact factor: 3.250