| Literature DB >> 27802317 |
Fei Song1,2, Dandan Xu1,2, Kangsen Mai1,2, Huihui Zhou1,2, Wei Xu1, Gen He1,2.
Abstract
This study was designed to examine the cellular and systemic nutrient sensing mechanisms as well as the intermediary metabolism responses in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) fed with fishmeal diet (FM diet), 45% of FM replaced by meat and bone meal diet (MBM diet) or MBM diet supplemented with essential amino acids to match the amino acid profile of FM diet (MBM+AA diet). During the one month feeding trial, feed intake was not affected by the different diets. However, MBM diet caused significant reduction of specific growth rate and nutrient retentions. Compared with the FM diet, MBM diet down-regulated target of rapamycin (TOR) and insulin-like growth factor (IGFs) signaling pathways, whereas up-regulated the amino acid response (AAR) signaling pathway. Moreover, MBM diet significantly decreased glucose and lipid anabolism, while increased muscle protein degradation and lipid catabolism in liver. MBM+AA diet had no effects on improvement of MBM diet deficiencies. Compared with fasted, re-feeding markedly activated the TOR signaling pathway, IGF signaling pathway and glucose, lipid metabolism, while significantly depressed the protein degradation signaling pathway. These results thus provided a comprehensive display of molecular responses and a better explanation of deficiencies generated after fishmeal replacement by other protein sources.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27802317 PMCID: PMC5089717 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredients (g/100g) | Diets (Dry weight) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FM | MBM | MBM+AA | |
| Fishmeal | 60 | 33 | 33 |
| Meat and bone meal | 0 | 34.2 | 34.2 |
| Wheat gluten meal | 3 | 5 | 3.81 |
| Wheat meal | 22.6 | 13.4 | 13.4 |
| Beer yeast | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Amino acid mixture | 0 | 0 | 1.19 |
| Fish oil | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Palm oil | 1.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Lecithin | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Mineral premix | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Vitamin premix | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Choline chloride | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Attractant | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mold inhibitor | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Antioxidant | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Taurine | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| MCC | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Dry matter | 94.97 | 94.72 | 94.76 |
| Crude protein | 50.14 | 50.15 | 50.1 |
| Crude lipid | 11.61 | 11.82 | 11.8 |
| Gross energy (KJ/g) | 20.7 | 20 | 19.8 |
FM, fishmeal; MBM, meat and bone meal replacement diet; MBM+AA, MBM diet with dietary essential amino acid supplementation.
a Fishmeal: steam dried fishmeal, with crude protein: 70.10%, crude lipid: 7.58%,supplied by COPEINCA Group (Lima, Peru).
b Meat and bone meal: Meat and bone meal, with crude protein: 55.34%,crude lipid: 10.04%, supplied by Australia.
c Wheat gluten meal and wheat meal act as carbohydrate source and filler, supplied by Great Seven Bio-tech. Co., Ltd (Shandong, China).
d Amino acid mixture(g/kg diet): L-Methionine (Coated amino acid obtained, 90%),2.4; L-Lysine (Coated amino acid, 60%), 6.1; L-Leucine (Crystalline amino acid, 99.4), 1.6; L-Histidine (Crystalline amino acid, 99.1%),0.5; L-Threonine (Crystalline amino acid, 99.9%), 1.3. Coated amino acid supplied by Beijing XingHuo Yuan Science and Technology Co., Ltd.Crystalline amino acid supplied byJizhou City Huayang Chemical Co., Ltd.
e Mineral premix (mg/kg diet): CoCl2·6H2O (1%), 50; CuSO4·5H2O (25%), 10; FeSO4·H2O (30%), 80; ZnSO4·H2O (34.50%), 50; MnSO4·H2O(31.80%), 45; MgSO4·7H2O(15%), 1200; Sodium selenite (1%), 20; Calcium iodine (1%) 60; Zeolite, 11470.
f Vitamin premix(mg/kg diet): thiamin (98%), 25; riboflavin (80%), 45; pyridoxine-HCl (99%), 20; vitamin B12 (1%), 10; vitamin K3 (51%), 10; inositol (98%), 800; pantothenic acid (98%), 60; niacin acid (99%), 200; folic acid (98%), 20; biotin (2%), 60; retinol acetate (500000 IU/g), 32; cholecalciferol (500000 IU/g), 5; alpha-tocopherol (50%), 240; ascorbic acid (35%), 2000; anti-oxidants (oxygen ling grams, 100%), 3; rice husk powder (100%), 11470.
g Attractant: (betaine: dimethylpro-piothetin: glycine: alanine: inosine5'-phosphate =
4:2:2:1:1).
Amino acids composition of the diets (%).
| Amino acid | FM | MBM | MBM+AA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essential amino acids | |||
| Leucine | 3.47 | 3.31 | 3.43 |
| Methionine | 1.26 | 1.06 | 1.20 |
| Lysine | 3.43 | 2.98 | 3.38 |
| Threonine | 2.10 | 1.77 | 1.98 |
| Arginine | 2.99 | 3.02 | 3.04 |
| Histidine | 1.12 | 1.04 | 1.16 |
| Phenylalanine | 2.11 | 2.17 | 2.18 |
| Isoleucine | 1.63 | 1.78 | 1.74 |
| Valine | 2.18 | 1.99 | 2.11 |
| Total EAA | 20.29 | 19.12 | 20.22 |
| Glycine | 3.28 | 4.17 | 4.45 |
| Aspartic acid | 4.26 | 3.62 | 3.83 |
| Serine | 2.51 | 2.23 | 2.34 |
| Proline | 2.50 | 3.17 | 3.23 |
| Cysteine | 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.09 |
| Tyrosine | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.15 |
| Alanine | 2.98 | 3.06 | 3.22 |
| Glutamic acid | 7.84 | 7.29 | 7.39 |
| Total NEAA | 25.88 | 26.09 | 26.71 |
| EAA/NEAA | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
FM, fishmeal; MBM, meat and bone meal replacement diet; MBM+AA, MBM diet with dietary essential amino acid supplementation.
a ΣEAA: sum of essential amino acid
b ΣNEAA: sum of non-essential amino acid
The primer pairs sequences used for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Forward primer (5'-3') | Reverse primer (5'-3') | Amplicon size (bp) | Ta (°C) | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF-I | 145 | 59 | FJ160587.1 | ||
| IGF-II | 424 | 56 | JN032705.1 | ||
| IGF-IR | 228 | 58 | AJ224993.1 | ||
| IGFBP-1 | 246 | 59 | JF441174.1 | ||
| IGFBP-2 | 241 | 58 | HQ696115.1 | ||
| IGFBP-4 | 200 | 59 | |||
| IGFBP-5 | 241 | 58 | |||
| IGFBP-6 | 207 | 59 | |||
| Murf-1 | 185 | 58 | |||
| Atrogin-1 | 184 | 58 | |||
| BCKDH-E2 | 157 | 60 | |||
| PK | 236 | 60 | DQ848903 | ||
| GK | 218 | 60 | JX678944 | ||
| G6Pase1 | 193 | 58 | KC184131 | ||
| FBPase | 157 | 60 | KC184130 | ||
| FAS | 195 | 58 | KC189927 | ||
| SREBP1 | 136 | 60 | |||
| DGAT1 | 177 | 58 | KC189938 | ||
| DGAT2 | 163 | 56 | KC189939 | ||
| ACOX1 | 240 | 58 | KC189925 | ||
| CPT1A | 96 | 58 | KC189926 | ||
| RPSD | 151 | 58–60 | DQ848899.1 | ||
| EF1α | 226 | 56–60 | AF467776.1 |
IGF-I, insulin-like growth-factor-I; IGF-II, insulin-like growth-factor-II; IGF-IR, insulin-like growth-factor I receptor; IGFBP-1, insulin-like growth-factor binding protein 1; IGFBP-2, insulin-like growth-factor binding protein 2; PK, pyruvate kinase; GK, glucokinase; G6Pase1, glucose 6 phosphatase 1; FBPase, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; FAS, fatty acid synthetase; DGAT1, diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase homolog 1; DGAT2, diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase homolog 2; ACOX1, acyl-CoA oxidase 1; CPT1A, carnitine palmitoryltransferase 1 isoform A; RPSD, RNA polymerase II subunit D; EF1α, elongation factor-1 alpha.
a partial sequences of target genes in turbot were obtained through a degenerate PCR strategy in this study, including IGFBP-4, insulin-like growth-factor binding protein 4; IGFBP-5, insulin-like growth-factor binding protein 5; IGFBP-6, insulin-like growth-factor binding protein 6; Murf-1, muscle RING-finger 1, Atrogin-1; BCKDH-E2, branch-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase E2 subunit and SREBP1, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1.The partial sequence of those genes were presented in the S1 File.
Growth performance and nutrient utilization of turbot after one-month feeding trial on experimental diets.
| FM | MBM | MBM+AA | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 9.19±0.01 | 9.10±0.07 | 9.19±0.01 | 0.27 |
| Final body weight (g) | 28.79±1.01 | 21.87±0.74 | 22.96±0.34 | <0.001 |
| Specific growth rate (%/d) | 3.26±0.10 | 2.50±0.08 | 2.61±0.04 | <0.001 |
| Feed efficiency rate | 1.52±0.06 | 1.27±0.04 | 1.32±0.02 | 0.01 |
| Survival rate (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.17±0.83 | 0.42 |
| Feed intake (%/d) | 2.27±0.13 | 2.16±0.06 | 2.16±0.03 | 0.59 |
| Protein retention (%) | 48.08±1.94 | 38.32±1.08 | 38.51±0.88 | <0.001 |
| Fat retention (%) | 53.83±2.30 | 33.81±2.25 | 35.03±2.38 | <0.001 |
| Energy retention (%) | 36.59±1.45 | 29.82±1.05 | 29.32±1.20 | 0.01 |
| Whole body protein content (% w.w. | 15.40±0.14 | 14.78±0.06 | 14.48±0.11 | <0.001 |
| Whole body fat content (% w.w. | 3.47±0.17 | 2.83±0.09 | 2.85±0.13 | 0.02 |
FM, fishmeal; MBM, meat and bone meal replacement diet; MBM+AA, MBM diet with dietary essential amino acid supplementation.
Values are means ± SE, n = 3. Mean values in the same column with different superscripted small letters mean significant difference (P<0.05).
a Specific growth rate (%/d) = 100×[ln (final body weight)−ln (initial body weight)]/d
b Feed efficiency = wet weight gain (g)/total feed consumed (g).
c Survival rate (%) = 100×(final fish number/initial fish number).
d Feed intake (% body weight/d) = 100×feed consumption/(30 d × (initial body weight + final body weight)/2).
e Nutrient retention = [100×(final body weight×final carcass nutrient content)−(initial body weight×initial carcass nutrient content)]/nutrient intake, where nutrient refers to protein, lipid and energy
f w. w.: wet weight
Fig 1Post-prandial expression profile of TOR signaling pathway in muscle (A) and liver (B) of juvenile turbot. Values are means ± SE, n = 6. All results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. Data are expressed relative to reference protein Tubulin. When the interaction was significant (P < 0.05), “a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i” mean different from all treatments. On the contrary, “A,B,C,D” were used to represented the significant difference from time points and “X,Y,Z” were used to represented the significant difference from diets (P<0.05). T, D and T×D represented time points, diets and interaction between T and D, respectively. SQRT indicates that data were transformed and statistically analyzed with square roots.
Fig 2Post-prandial expression profile of AAR signaling pathway in muscle (A) and liver (B) of juvenile turbot. Results are represented as means with standard errors (n = 6) and were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test. The different superscript letters (‘a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h’) mean significantly different among the values (P<0.05). LG10 indicates that data were transformed and statistically analyzed with log transforms; SQRT indicates that data were transformed and statistically analyzed with square roots.
Fig 3Post-prandial genes expression of IGF signaling pathway in the liver of juvenile turbot.
Values are means ± SE, n = 6. All treatments were normalized to the expression level of 0 h FM diet group and by the reference gene EF1α. “a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i” were used to show significant difference between time points and diets (P<0.05). LG10 indicates that data were transformed and statistically analyzed with log transforms; SQRT indicates that data were transformed and statistically analyzed with square roots.
Fig 4Post-prandial mRNA (A) and total protein expression (B) of protein degradation in muscle of juvenile turbot. Total protein of Murf-1 expression and the factors involved in ubiquination mRNA expression level (B) Values are means ± SENs, n = 6. All treatments were normalized to the expression level of 0 hrs FM and by the reference gene EF1α. “a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i”, “A,B,C” and “X,Y,Z” were used to show significant difference between time points and diets (P<0.05).
Fig 5Post-prandial genes expression of intermediary metabolism in liver of juvenile turbot.
The key enzymes involved in the liver glucose and lipid metabolism values are means ± SE, n = 6. The housekeeping gene EF1α was regarded as an internal control. ‘a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h’. ‘A,B,C,D’ and ‘X,Y,Z’ mean values were significantly different (P<0.05).