Ruby Ponnudurai1, Manuel Kleiner2, Lizbeth Sayavedra3, Jillian M Petersen3,4, Martin Moche5, Andreas Otto5, Dörte Becher5, Takeshi Takeuchi6, Noriyuki Satoh6, Nicole Dubilier3, Thomas Schweder1,7, Stephanie Markert1,7. 1. Institute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany. 2. Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 3. Department of Symbiosis, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany. 4. Division of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 5. Institute of Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany. 6. Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan. 7. Institute of Marine Biotechnology, Greifswald, Germany.
Abstract
The hydrothermal vent mussel Bathymodiolus azoricus lives in an intimate symbiosis with two types of chemosynthetic Gammaproteobacteria in its gills: a sulfur oxidizer and a methane oxidizer. Despite numerous investigations over the last decades, the degree of interdependence between the three symbiotic partners, their individual metabolic contributions, as well as the mechanism of carbon transfer from the symbionts to the host are poorly understood. We used a combination of proteomics and genomics to investigate the physiology and metabolism of the individual symbiotic partners. Our study revealed that key metabolic functions are most likely accomplished jointly by B. azoricus and its symbionts: (1) CO2 is pre-concentrated by the host for carbon fixation by the sulfur-oxidizing symbiont, and (2) the host replenishes essential biosynthetic TCA cycle intermediates for the sulfur-oxidizing symbiont. In return (3), the sulfur oxidizer may compensate for the host's putative deficiency in amino acid and cofactor biosynthesis. We also identified numerous 'symbiosis-specific' host proteins by comparing symbiont-containing and symbiont-free host tissues and symbiont fractions. These proteins included a large complement of host digestive enzymes in the gill that are likely involved in symbiont digestion and carbon transfer from the symbionts to the host.
The hydrothermal vent mussel Bathymodiolus azoricus lives in an intimate symbiosis with two types of chemosynthetic Gammaproteobacteria in its gills: a sulfur oxidizer and a methane oxidizer. Despite numerous investigations over the last decades, the degree of interdependence between the three symbiotic partners, their individual metabolic contributions, as well as the mechanism of carbon transfer from the symbionts to the host are poorly understood. We used a combination of proteomics and genomics to investigate the physiology and metabolism of the individual symbiotic partners. Our study revealed that key metabolic functions are most likely accomplished jointly by B. azoricus and its symbionts: (1) CO2 is pre-concentrated by the host for carbon fixation by the sulfur-oxidizing symbiont, and (2) the host replenishes essential biosynthetic TCA cycle intermediates for the sulfur-oxidizing symbiont. In return (3), the sulfur oxidizer may compensate for the host's putative deficiency in amino acid and cofactor biosynthesis. We also identified numerous 'symbiosis-specific' host proteins by comparing symbiont-containing and symbiont-free host tissues and symbiont fractions. These proteins included a large complement of host digestive enzymes in the gill that are likely involved in symbiont digestion and carbon transfer from the symbionts to the host.
Life at deep-sea hydrothermal vents is powered by chemosynthetic bacteria, many
of which live in symbiosis with animals. Hydrothermal vents of the Mid-Atlantic
Ridge (MAR) are home to the mytilid bivalve Bathymodiolus azoricus,
which harbours two types of gammaproteobacterial endosymbionts (von Cosel ; Van Dover, 2000; Duperron ). Unlike other vent symbioses, such as the giant tube wormRiftia pachyptila and the clam Calyptogena spp., which
display extreme dependence on their chemoautotrophic endosymbionts for
nourishment (Childress and Fisher, 1992), B.
azoricus are mixotrophs: They possess a functional gut and feeding
groove for filter feeding in addition to the chemosynthetic symbionts in their
gills (Page ; Gustafson ; von Cosel ; Riou ). Filter-feeding may supplement the symbiotic
diet of the host with particulate and organic matter from their surroundings
(Le Pennec ) and may
also enable them to survive without symbionts for limited periods of time
(Colaco ). However,
aposymbiotic B. azoricus in laboratory aquaria display an overall
reduction in their fitness and health (Raulfs ; Kádár
), suggesting that despite their
nutritional flexibility, B. azoricus mussels depend on their symbionts
for long-term sustenance.B. azoricus maintains a stable symbiotic partnership with two distinct
gammaproteobacterial phylotypes living within its gills (Figure 1). The co-occurrence of a thiotrophic symbiont, which
oxidizes reduced sulfur compounds, and a methanotroph, which oxidizes methane
(Fiala-Médioni ),
enables B. azoricus to simultaneously tap the energy from two of the
most abundant reductants in the MAR vent fluids. The symbionts are housed in
vacuoles within specialized gill epithelial cells called bacteriocytes. The
bacteriocytes face the apical side of the gill filament, which is in contact
with the vent fluids (Figure 1; Distel ). The physical proximity of the
bacteriocytes to the ambient vent fluids facilitates direct exchange of
dissolved gases and substrates (Childress and Fisher,
1992) and may also allow quick responses of symbionts to changes
in environmental conditions. The host presumably acquires nutrients from the
symbionts by digesting them using lysosomal degradation enzymes (Streams ; Fiala-Médioni ; Kádár ).
Figure 1
Schema of a B. azoricus gill bacteriocyte. (a) Dissected
B. azoricus specimen showing gills and gill filaments.
(b) Schema of single gill filament. (c) Schematic
cross-section of a gill filament showing bacteriocytes. (d) A single
bacteriocyte showing the central pathways of the symbionts. Symbionts
(thiotroph: green, methanotroph: red) are located inside vacuoles (white)
surrounded by the bacteriocyte cytosol (brown) with gases and substrates
exchanged between vent fluids (blue) flushing the gills. An overview of the
basic metabolic processes occurring in the symbionts is shown. AT: ammonium
transporter, DH: dehydrogenase, DeNit: denitrification, FormAsn:
formaldehyde assimilation, FormOx: formaldehyde oxidation to formate and
CO2, HydOx: hydrogen oxidation, MetOx: methane oxidation by
pMMO (particulate methane-monooxygenase enzyme complex) to methanol and then
to formaldehyde (see Supplementary Figure
S2B for details), NitAsn: nitrogen assimilation, NitRes:
nitrate respiration (see Supplementary Figure
S4 for details on nitrogen metabolism), NT: nitrate
transporter, OxRes: Oxidative phosphorylation with oxygen as terminal
electron acceptor, SOX: thiosulfate oxidation, SulfOx: sulfide oxidation via
the rDSR-APS-Sat pathway (see Supplementary Figure
S2A), TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle, TRAP: tripartite
ATP-independent periplasmic transporter, T1SS: Type I secretion system,
T2SS: Type II secretion system. *toxins are known to be secreted by the
thiotrophs (Sayavedra ).
The symbionts' location within host bacteriocytes allows for intricate
metabolic interactions between the host and the symbionts. So far, only a
handful of whole gill-based ‘omics' studies have examined this
complex association, most of them focusing on the physiology of the host
(Bettencourt ; Company ; Petersen ; Sayavedra
). The fact that the symbionts are
uncultivable as yet and the mussels can only be maintained temporarily under
controlled laboratory conditions (Kádár
) has rendered detailed physiological
investigations difficult. We therefore conducted a culture-independent
proteogenomic study, which – for the first time – provided a
detailed and comprehensive picture of host–symbiont interaction dynamics
and metabolic interdependencies in B. azoricus. To detect host proteins
potentially involved in symbiosis-specific functions, we compared protein
expression patterns between symbiont-containing and symbiont-free host
tissues.
Experimental procedures
Sampling of Bathymodiolus mussels and differential enrichment
for proteomics
Sampling details and biological replicate numbers for all analyses performed
in this study are summarized in Supplementary Table
S1A. For proteome analyses, B. azoricus mussels were
collected from the Menez Gwen vent field on the MAR at
37°50'41'' N, 31°31'10'' W
during the RV Meteor cruise M82-3 as described by Sayavedra and colleagues
(2015). The mussels were dissected, gill tissue was removed and homogenized
in 1x PBS (Figure 2, see Supplementary Methods for a detailed description of the
enrichment procedure). The homogenate was subjected to a combination of
differential pelleting and rate-zonal centrifugation using density gradients
on board the research vessel to separate the symbionts and host components
from each other (Figure 2). The composition of
putative host- and symbiont-enriched fractions after centrifugation was
analysed using catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ
hybridization (CARD-FISH, see Supplementary
Information). Based on the CARD-FISH evaluation, the
host-enriched supernatant (containing soluble host proteins) and the
symbiont-enriched gradient pellet (containing both symbionts, but
particularly enriched in the thiotroph) were chosen for further proteomic
analysis (Figure 2). Additionally, complete gill
and foot tissue samples from the same animals that were processed by
centrifugation were also frozen at −80 °C to enable
comparisons between the proteomes of whole tissues and of host- and
symbiont-enriched fractions.
Figure 2
Density gradient enrichment of symbiont cells and host components followed by
CARD-FISH. (a) Step-wise workflow of the density gradient enrichment
method for physical separation of B. azoricus host and symbiont
cells. Sampling for tissue-based metaproteomic analysis of whole gill and
foot tissue is also shown. Bold font: enriched fractions elaborated in panel
b and c. (b) Epifluorescence micrographs of supernatant (left) and
gradient pellet (right) fractions obtained from the enrichment method shown
in panel a. Green CARD-FISH signal: thiotrophs; red CARD-FISH signal:
methanotrophs; blue DAPI signal: host. Scale bar: 2 μm. (c)
Enhanced spectral abundance of symbiont- and host-associated proteins in
density gradient-based enrichments (symbiont-enriched gradient pellet and
host-enriched supernatant) as compared to unenriched (gill and foot)
tissues. Stacked bars show the % of spectral abundance (calculated by
summing up NSAF% and averaging it across biological replicates)
contributed by thiotrophs, methanotrophs and host, respectively, to the
total spectral abundance of each sample type. O: proteins identified by
LTQ-Orbitrap Classic MS/MS analysis (n=3), V: proteins
identified by LTQ-Orbitrap Velos MS/MS analysis (n=2,
see Methods).
Proteomic analysis
Specific details of the protein extraction procedure, 1D-PAGE, LC-MS/MS,
protein identification, validation and quantitation can be found in the
Supplementary Methods section. Briefly,
soluble proteins and membrane-associated proteins were extracted from
enriched gradient fractions in biological triplicates (that is, from three
B. azoricus individuals) and from whole tissue samples in
biological duplicates (for replicate numbers of all MS measurements see
Supplementary Table S1B). Proteins were
separated using 1D-PAGE and in-gel digested with trypsin. Resulting peptides
were separated by liquid chromatography and analysed simultaneously by
coupling the liquid chromatography online to a mass spectrometer. For
identification of host and symbiont proteins, all MS/MS spectra were
searched against a comprehensive protein database (see Supplementary Methods and Supplementary
Table S2A for a list of all organisms whose protein sequences
are included in the database). For relative semi-quantitative analysis of
proteins, normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) values were calculated
for each sample (NSAF%, Florens ). NSAFs were subsequently also normalized for each
organism individually (OrgNSAF%, Mueller ).
Statistical analyses for the identification of putative
symbiosis-relevant proteins
To identify potentially symbiosis-relevant host and symbiont proteins we did
a statistical comparison of protein abundances in different sample types.
For host proteins that may play a direct role in the symbiosis we tested for
proteins whose NSAF values differ significantly between the
symbiont-containing gill samples (whole gill and gill supernatant) versus
the symbiont-free foot tissue. Host proteins that are potentially involved
in direct interactions with the symbionts (that is, physically linked to the
symbionts) were 'pulled down' by the symbionts during
centrifugation-based symbiont enrichment. We identified these proteins by
testing for host protein abundances that were significantly higher in the
symbiont-enriched gradient pellet versus the whole gill samples and the gill
supernatant. Statistical evaluation of differences between samples involved
Log transformations of NSAF%/OrgNSAF% values followed by
t-test, all of which were done using the Perseus software
(version 1.4.1.3, http://www.perseus-framework.org/doku.php) as
described in the Supplementary Methods.
Data accessibility
The mass spectrometry proteomics data and the protein sequence database were
uploaded to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Vizcaíno ) partner
repository with the dataset identifier PXD004061 (DOI:
10.6019/PXD004061). Nucleotide and protein sequence information
for the methanotrophic symbionts of B. azoricus and of
Bathymodiolus sp. was deposited in GenBank under the BioProject
accession numbers PRJEB13769 and PRJEB13047, respectively.
Results and discussion
Enhanced protein identification following density gradient enrichment
in B. azoricus
We used a multistep centrifugation technique to physically separate host
components and thiotrophic and methanotrophic symbiont cells of B.
azoricus. This enrichment substantially enhanced the rate of
spectral identifications for the respective individual organisms, as
compared to plain, unenriched tissue. Our centrifugation procedure involved
differential pelleting of host nuclei followed by rate-zonal density
gradient centrifugation for symbiont enrichment (Figure
2a). We analysed the resulting fractions with CARD-FISH and
DAPI staining to identify fractions where either host material or symbiont
cells were enriched (Figure 2b). Relative cell
counts revealed that 93% of the cells in the gradient pellet were
thiotrophic and methanotrophic endosymbionts and that 97% of the
solid material in the supernatant consisted of host nuclei and host cell
fragments (see Supplementary Figure S1).
This enrichment was clearly reflected in our proteomic results, where we
found a 17.7% increase in symbiont-associated spectral
identifications (NSAF) in the symbiont-enriched gradient pellet, and a
15% increase in host spectral identifications in the host-enriched
supernatant, as compared to the gill tissue (Figure
2c). The enhanced spectral identification rate enabled better
quantification of the identified proteins and substantially improved the
proteome coverage: The number of identified proteins in enriched samples
increased by 7.4% (host proteins) and 9.3% (symbiont proteins)
compared to those from unenriched tissues (Supplementary Table S2C, see Supplementary Results and Discussion for absolute numbers of
identified proteins). Grouping of the most abundant proteins (in terms of
NSAF%) of the symbiotic partners into metabolic categories allowed us
to trace the metabolic network of the B. azoricus consortium
(Figure 3).
Figure 3
The 75 most abundant proteins of the B. azoricus host and symbionts
as identified in our study in LTQ-Orbitrap Velos MS/MS analyses. Each
bubble represents an identified protein in the respective sample and its
abundance in terms of average NSAF% (relative abundance in %
of all proteins in the sample). Sample types are indicated on top, protein
names are listed on the left (see Supplementary Table
S3 for protein functions). Proteins were grouped based on
their respective metabolic categories inferred from the KEGG and MetaCyc
pathway databases. *Functionally redundant symbiont protein
identifications and proteins of unknown function were excluded in this
figure. **Host proteins with functions beyond the scope of this
study were not included in this figure. Note: This figure
illustrates only protein data from LTQ-Orbitrap Velos MS/MS analyses,
but not from parallel LTQ-Orbitrap Classic measurements of the same samples
(see Methods for details). The complete data set including all measurements
is shown in Supplementary Table S3.
The B. azoricus symbiosis is fuelled by a versatile array of
energy sources
Thiosulfate oxidation
In the thiotrophic B. azoricus symbiont, thiosulfate as an
energy source seems to play a more prominent role than in other
chemoautotrophic symbioses. We found the thiotroph's SoxYZ
proteins for thiosulfate oxidation (Sox) to be more abundant than the
dissimilatory sulfite reductase (Dsr) enzymes DsrAB for hydrogen sulfide
oxidation: With 1.104 OrgNSAF% (SoxYZ) and 0.894 OrgNSAF%
(DsrAB), the enzyme complexes were present in a DsrAB:SoxYZ ratio of
0.81 (soluble protein fraction of gradient pellet samples, Velos
analysis, see Supplementary Table S3).
In contrast, the sulfur-oxidizing symbionts of R. pachyptila
and Olavius algarvensis express DsrAB at much higher levels
than SoxYZ. The DsrAB:SoxYZ ratio in the Riftia symbiont was
2.5 (n=3; S. Markert, unpublished results), and 5.2 in
the Olavius Gamma 1 symbiont (Kleiner
). In addition to the Sox enzyme
complex, we identified two sulfur/thiosulfate carrier protein
homologs, a TusA domain-containing protein (Rhd1,
BazSymB_scaffold00007_23) and a Rhodanese-like domain-containing protein
(Rhd2, BazSymB_scaffold00002_24) in the B. azoricus thiotroph
(Supplementary Figure S2A). In fact,
Rhd1 was one of the most abundant proteins in the thiotroph's
membrane proteome (membrane OrgNSAF% from gradient pellet,
Supplementary Table S3). Rhodaneses
cleave thiosulfate to sulfite and sulfide (Brune,
1995, Supplementary Figure
S2A), while TusA has been shown to mediate thiosulfate
transfer in an acidothermophilic sulfur- and tetrathionate-oxidizing
archaeon (Liu ).
Both rhodanese proteins together constituted 2.11 OrgNSAF% in the
thiotrophic B. azoricus symbiont (for comparison: the
Riftia symbiont's rhodanese proteins make up only
0.15 OrgNSAF %, n=3; S. Markert, unpublished).
The B. azoricus thiotroph clearly oxidizes sulfide, as
indicated by the detection of most components of the rDSR-APS-Sat
pathway (see Supplementary Results and
Discussion). However, the relatively high expression of
thiosulfate-metabolizing and -transfer enzymes (compared to the
sulfur-oxidizing symbionts of other host animals) indicates that
thiosulfate oxidation may be particularly important for the B.
azoricus symbiosis in its specific habitat. This is in
agreement with previous studies, in which thiosulfate was observed to
stimulate carbon fixation much more than sulfide in the thiotrophic
symbionts of related Bathymodiolus species (Belkin ; Fisher
).Thiosulfate is more stable than sulfide and is less toxic to aerobic
respiration (Harada ). In other symbiotic species such as vestimentiferan
tubeworms and vesicomyid clams, sulfide is transported in a less harmful
form, bound to the host's hemoglobin (Arp
, 1987; Doeller ). However, no dedicated
host proteins for sulfide transport are known in Bathymodiolus
mussels (Powell and Somero, 1986). High
concentrations of thiosulfate (0.178 mM in gills
versus 0.079 mM in other tissues) in the closely
related B. thermophilus led Fisher to propose that the host may detoxify
sulfide from the environment to the less toxic thiosulfate.
Host-mediated thiosulfate production as a means of sulfide
detoxification was recently also suggested for B. brevior
(Beinart ). If
B. azoricus uses a similar mechanism of sulfide
detoxification, then its symbionts would be exposed to thiosulfate
concentrations that are much higher than those in the environment. This
may stimulate higher expression of thiosulfate-metabolizing enzymes in
the B. azoricus thiotroph as compared to other symbionts, whose
hosts do not produce thiosulfate as a means of sulfide
detoxification.
Hydrogen oxidation
In addition to its capacity for thiotrophy, the B. azoricusthiotroph is also capable of using hydrogen (H2) as an
electron acceptor (Petersen ). Genes for hydrogen oxidation were clearly
expressed, but at lower abundance compared with enzymes involved in
sulfide or thiosulfate oxidation. H2 oxidation may therefore
not be as important as the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds for the
thiotroph under the conditions prevailing at the sampling site in this
study (see Supplementary Figure S2A and
Supplementary Results and
Discussion).
Methane oxidation
The energy-generating methane oxidation process is the most prominent
metabolic pathway in the methanotrophic B. azoricus symbiont.
Its key enzymes, the particulate methane monooxygenase PmoCAB and the
methanol dehydrogenase XoxF that catalyze the oxidation of methane to
formaldehyde, constituted 28.6% of the membrane OrgNSAF in the
gradient pellet samples and 2.4% of the gill OrgNSAF,
respectively (Supplementary Figure S2B,
Supplementary Results and
Discussion). Considering the high catalytic efficiency of
both enzymes (Chan ;
Keltjens ),
these high expression levels likely correspond to very high methane
oxidation rates in the B. azoricusmethanotroph. As indicated
by our results, the symbiont can accomplish the subsequent
energy-producing oxidation of formaldehyde to formate and CO2
via two parallel metabolic routes, that is, the tetrahydrofolate
(H4F) pathway and the dephospho-tetrahydromethanopterin
(H4MPT) pathway (see Supplementary
Figure S3 and Supplementary Results
and Discussion for details). We identified enzymes of
both pathways in the methanotroph's proteome. The presence of
multiple routes for formaldehyde metabolism may offer enhanced metabolic
flexibility to the symbiont under various environmental conditions.
Also, since accumulation of formaldehyde is toxic to the cells, the two
formaldehyde oxidation pathways may operate as overflow valves for
controlling excess formaldehyde levels, while simultaneously generating
electrons and reducing equivalents during the process (Crowther ).
Pathways for carbon assimilation are highly expressed in both symbionts
while crucial TCA cycle enzymes are missing in the thiotroph
Assimilation of C1 compounds
In the proteomes of both the thiotrophic and the methanotrophic B.
azoricus symbiont, carbon fixation pathways were highly
abundant, reflecting their importance in the symbiotic association. The
thiotroph uses the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle for autotrophic fixation
of CO2 (see Supplementary Results and
Discussion and Figure 4a).
All Calvin-Benson-Bassham pathway enzymes were highly abundant in the
thiotroph. The large subunit of ribulose bisphosphate
carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO form I, CbbL,
BazSymA_Acontig00018_18), the key enzyme of the Calvin-Benson-Bassham
cycle, was consistently the most abundant enzyme of the
thiotroph'scarbon metabolism in all samples analysed in our study
(Figures 3 and 4a, Supplementary Table
S3). The methanotroph expressed a complete ribulose
monophosphate (RuMP) pathway for the assimilation of carbon from
formaldehyde, as well as parts of a second carbon assimilation pathway,
the serine cycle (see Figure 4b, Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplementary Results and Discussion). The
high abundance of the two RuMP pathway key enzymes hexulose-6-phosphate
formaldehyde lyase (Hps, BAZMOX_41472_2) and 3-hexulose-6-phosphate
isomerase (Hpi1, BAGiLS_016202) indicates that the methanotroph
primarily uses this pathway for formaldehyde assimilation. The serine
cycle seems to play a minor role in carbon assimilation as compared to
the dominant RuMP pathway under the conditions in this study (see
Supplementary Results and
Discussion).
Figure 4
Central carbon metabolism in B. azoricus symbionts. (a) In
the thiotrophic symbiont. (b) In the methanotrophic symbiont. Eda:
KHG/KDPG aldolase, GlgB: 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme, Mdh: Malate
dehydrogenase, ME: malic enzyme, Odh: 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, PpsA:
PEP synthase, Sdh: succinate dehydrogenase. For functions of enzymes that
were detected as proteins in this study refer to Supplementary Table S3. Protein abundances correspond to
average OrgNSAF% in the respective organism from whole gill tissue
samples (in Velos MS/MS measurements, see Supplementary Table S3). See Supplementary Table S2B for genome assemblies used for gene
prediction. Multiple arrows indicate multiple enzymatic steps. Dotted arrows
indicate enzymes that are missing in the respective symbiont's genome.
Sizes are not drawn to scale.
Incomplete TCA cycle in the thiotroph
The thiotrophic symbiont of B. azoricus appears to be unable to
replenish the crucial carbon metabolism intermediates oxaloacetate and
succinate. As expected in an obligate autotroph, the thiotroph lacks the
tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (Odh;
Wood ; Kleiner ). The absence
of Odh effectively prevents wasteful re-oxidation of autotrophically
fixed organic carbon, while still allowing for the production of carbon
precursors for amino acid biosynthesis and other anabolic pathways.
Intermediates of this ‘horse shoe' TCA cycle are usually
replenished by anaplerotic pathways such as the glyoxylate bypass.
Surprisingly, our proteogenomic analysis revealed that not only the gene
encoding Odh is missing in the thiotroph, but also the genes for the TCA
cycle enzymes malate dehydrogenase (Mdh) and succinate dehydrogenase
(Sdh, Figure 4a). Moreover, the thiotroph
apparently lacks all known genes encoding anaplerotic enzymes for the
replenishment of the essential TCA cycle intermediates oxaloacetate and
succinate (see Supplementary Results and
Discussion), although it expresses enzymes involved in
oxaloacetate and succinate consumption (Figure
4a). Oxaloacetate is an important precursor for
biosynthesis of essential amino acids of the aspartate family, while
succinate, or rather its derivative succinyl-CoA, is required for the
biosynthesis of porphyrins and amino acids. Replenishment of
oxaloacetate and succinate is therefore crucial for cellular metabolism
and alternate mechanisms for refilling both intermediates must exist
(see below).
Complete TCA cycle in the methanotroph
Unlike the thiotrophic symbiont of B. azoricus, the methanotroph
has a complete set of genes encoding TCA cycle enzymes, including
odh (BAZMOX_25028_0). Odh, Mdh and Sdh were, however, not
detected in the methanotroph's proteome (Figure
4b). In the facultative methylotroph Methylobacterium
extorquens AM1, odh expression is repressed during
growth on C1-compounds (Chistoserdova ). It is therefore possible that the
methanotrophic symbiont of B. azoricus expresses a complete,
energy-producing TCA cycle during growth on multicarbon compounds when
the preferred carbon source methane is not available, and an incomplete
version of the TCA cycle that produces anabolic intermediates when
methane is plentiful (Zhao and Hanson,
1984; Chistoserdova ; Wood ; Dedysh ). In the absence of methane, cellular storage
polymers such as glycogen may serve as readily available multicarbon
compounds for energy generation. This idea is supported by the detection
of glycogen synthesis enzymes in the methanotroph's proteome
(Figure 4b, Supplementary Table S3, Supplementary Results and Discussion).
Some metabolic tasks are accomplished jointly by the symbiotic
partners
CO2 concentration by carbonic anhydrase in
gills
In the B. azoricus gill metaproteome, host-derived carbonic
anhydrase (CA) is one of the most abundant proteins expressed (Figures 3 and 4a,
Supplementary Table S3,
BAGiLS_000922). The enzyme was ~10 times more abundant in gills and ~19
times more abundant in the supernatant, respectively, as compared to
symbiont-free foot tissue (Table 1),
suggesting a symbiosis-specific role for the host CA in B.
azoricus. In marine invertebrates such as anemones, corals,
tubeworms and clams harbouring carbon-fixing bacteria, the ubiquitous
enzyme CA facilitates the reversible conversion of bicarbonate, the
dominant form of seawater carbon, to CO2 for transport to
symbiont-bearing tissues (Kochevar and Childress,
1996). The B. azoricus CA therefore likely
represents a CO2-concentrating mechanism, which provides
elevated levels of inorganic carbon for fixation by the thiotrophic
symbiont (Figure 4a). High activity and
protein expression of host CA was also described in gills of
Bathymodiolus mussels hosting only methanotrophic
symbionts, where CA may be involved in the elimination of CO2
produced as an end product of methane oxidation (Hongo ). In addition to the host CA,
we also found the CAs of the thiotroph and of the methanotroph expressed
(BAT01672, BAZMOX_02303_3), albeit in very low abundances. It is unclear
whether either of the CAs from host, methanotroph or thiotroph
participate in the elimination of methanotroph-derived CO2.
We speculate that in B. azoricus this methanotroph-derived
CO2, instead of being eliminated, may be recycled by the
thiotrophic symbiont for CO2 fixation (Nelson and Fisher, 1995).
Table 1
Host proteins with putative symbiosis-specific roles
Protein accession number
Protein function
Statistical significance
Expression ratios
Group A
Group B
Group A
Group B
Gill vs. Foot
Sup vs. Foot
GP vs. Sup
GP vs. Gill
Gill:Foot
Sup:Foot
GP:Sup
GP:Gill
Proteins with putative digestive functions
BAGiLS_012512
Glycoside hydrolase, family 18, catalytic domain (similar to
chitinase)
X
Gill only
Sup only
BAGiLS_002552
Glycoside hydrolase, family 18, catalytic domain (similar to
chitinase)
X
Gill only
Sup only
BAGiLS_000898
Peptidase M28 (Aminopeptidase Y)
X
26.82
9.38
BAGiLS_003294
Peptidase, cysteine peptidase active site (Cathepsin
protein)
X
X
13.34
23.35
BAGiLS_021119
Putative beta-glycosidase
X
Gill only
Sup only
BAGiLS_000621
Saposin B
X
88.4
114.34
BAGiLS_005809
Palmitoyl protein thioesterase
X
3.53
3.21
BAGiLS_000071
Peptidase M16, C-terminal
X
15.2
2.39
BAGiLS_000588
Peptidase family M28 (aminopeptidase)
X
1.3
11.92
BAGiLS_000416
Peptidase M16, C-terminal
X
8.14
2.56
BAGiLS_001815
Peptidase M16, C-terminal
X
15.65
5.89
BAGiLS_009112
Peptidase M16, core
X
9.75
1.22
Carbon transport and metabolism
BAGiLS_001414
CA, carbonic anhydrase, alpha-class, catalytic domain
X
X
10.65
19.21
BAGiLS_000922
CA, carbonic anhydrase, alpha-class, catalytic domain
X
10.1
15.4
BAGiLS_005913
Odh, dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase component of
2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex
sushi domain-containing protein (involved in cell
adhesion)
X
Gill only
Sup only
BAGiLS_005314
MD-2-related lipid-recognition domain protein (putative pathogen
recognition protein)
X
X
25.36
12.56
BAGiLS_003036
Putative adhesin/invasin
X
41.44
7.21
BAGiLS_019106
Complement C1q protein
X
6.97
13.67
Samples shown in this table were chosen for comparison on the
following basis: Group A: to identify putative host proteins that
may play a direct role in the symbiosis, gill tissue and supernatant
samples (Sup, enriched in host cytosolic proteins from gill tissue)
were compared against the symbiont-free foot tissue. Group B: to
detect putative host proteins involved in direct interactions with
the symbionts (that is, physically linked to the symbionts or the
symbiont-surrounding vacuolar membrane), gradient pellet samples
(GP, enriched in symbionts) were compared against gill tissue and
supernatant samples. Expression ratios were calculated from
OrgNSAF% values (averages across all replicates) of the two
respective sample types, for example, Gill : Foot, GP : Sup, etc.
Proteins detected in only one of the two samples in comparison are
indicated by ‘Gill only', ‘Sup only' and
‘GP only'. Significant differences in protein expression
levels between two sample types are indicated by ‘X' in
the Statistical significance columns. A t-test with
permutation-based false discovery rate (FDR) calculation
(FDR=5%) was used to test for statistical significance
(see methods for details). This table only includes host proteins
putatively involved in symbiont digestion, immune-related functions
and carbon supply for the thiotrophic symbiont. For additional
proteins with putative symbiosis-relevant functions refer to
Supplementary Tables S4A and S4B. For protein accession numbers
refer to the DeepSeaVent database (http://transcriptomics.biocant.pt/deepSeaVent/).
Biosynthesis of amino acids and vitamins/cofactors in B.
azoricus
Only seven genes associated with amino acid biosynthesis were found in
the B. azoricus host EST library, of which four were identified
as proteins (Supplementary Figure S5).
In contrast, the genome of the thiotrophic symbiont contains essentially
complete gene sets for the biosynthesis of all 20 proteinogenic amino
acids and of 11 vitamins and cofactors. Ninety-five per cent of the
thiotroph's amino acid synthesis-related genes (that is, 63 of 66)
and 43% (26 out of 60) of the genes associated to cofactor
biosynthesis were identified as proteins (Supplementary Figure S5). In the methanotroph, 43 amino
acid synthesis genes and 30 cofactor synthesis genes were detected in
the genome, of which 30 (70%) and 11 (37%), respectively,
were detected at the protein level (Supplementary
Figure S5). As amino acids are indispensable for protein
biosynthesis in the host, the sparse presence of amino acid
synthesis-related genes in B. azoricus (even when considering
the incompleteness of the available transcriptome information) may
indicate that the bivalve depends on its symbionts for supply with amino
acids and cofactors. This putative deficiency in amino acid biosynthetic
enzymes seems to be uncommon in non-symbiotic marine mussels as several
species are capable of de novo synthesizing most amino acids
from TCA pathway intermediates (Ellis ). Bathymodiolus mussels can
acquire amino acids by direct uptake from seawater or from breakdown of
organic matter ingested through filter feeding (Riou ). But whether this can satisfy
all of their nutritional requirements is unclear (Martins ), particularly given the
unsteady availability of organic nutrients in the dynamic vent habitats.
Our results suggest that the B. azoricus symbionts are capable
of providing their host with all required amino acids and prosthetic
groups, a scenario that was previously also suggested for the
thiotrophic vesicomyid symbioses of Calyptogena magnifica and
C. okutanii (Newton ). Amino acids that are synthesized by the B.
azoricus symbionts may be made available to the host through
intracellular symbiont digestion, as indicated by the detection of
abundant host-derived digestive enzymes in the gill tissue (see
below).
Replenishment of oxaloacetate and succinate
As mentioned above, the thiotroph seems not to be able to restore its
oxaloacetate and succinate pools autonomously, as several TCA cycle
enzymes are missing in its genome, and potential anaplerotic routes that
could replace the missing enzymes are not encoded (Figures 4a and 5a, see
Supplementary Results and Discussion
for details). The required intermediates may instead be provided by the
host, as suggested by the results of our proteome analysis: The host
enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PckA, BAGiLS_012326) was
abundantly expressed in the B. azoricus gill metaproteome and
its expression was 3.7 fold higher in the gill as compared to the
symbiont-free foot tissue (calculated from host gill and foot
OrgNSAF% Supplementary Table S3).
PckA mediates the reversible carboxylation of phosphoenolpyruvate to
oxaloacetate (Prichard and Schofield,
1968; Moon ; Lee, 2002) and may
thus provide oxaloacetate for import into the thiotroph in B.
azoricus (Figure 5a and b). This
would effectively mean that a part of the carbon fixation is done on the
host side. Such an intimate metabolic integration of host and symbiont
on the level of central carbon metabolism would provide the host with a
direct way to control symbiont metabolism.
Figure 5
Speculated routes of oxaloacetate and succinate replenishment in the
thiotrophic B. azoricus symbiont. (a) Incomplete TCA cycle
in thiotrophs and possible mechanism of oxaloacetate and succinate
replenishment by host enzymes. Enzymes catalyzing reactions shown in grey
are not encoded in the B. azoricus thiotroph genome. All host
enzymes indicated here except AspC are highly abundant in the gill proteome
of B. azoricus (*these host proteins were detected with
significantly elevated expression levels in the symbiont-containing samples,
as compared to the symbiont-free foot tissue, see also Table 1). For abundance of the thiotroph's TCA cycle
enzymes refer to Figure 4a. A citrate
transporter, which might potentially import oxaloacetate (in exchange for an
unknown substrate such as pyruvate or acetate indicated in the figure by an
X), was not detected in the proteome but is encoded in the thiotroph's
genome. The depleted TCA intermediates oxaloacetate and
succinate/succinyl-CoA are marked in bold. AspC: aspartate transaminase,
Icl: isocitrate lyase, Mdh: malate dehydrogenase, Msh: malate synthase, ME:
malic enzyme, OadA: oxaloacetate decarboxylase, Odh: 2-oxoglutarate
dehydrogenase, PEP: phosphoenolpyruvate, PckA: PEP carboxykinase, Sdh:
succinate dehydrogenase. Note that amino acid biosynthesis from oxaloacetate
also involves succinyl-CoA, but that this interconnection of both pathways
is not shown in the interest of clarity. (b) Overview of enzymes that
can potentially transport or replenish oxaloacetate and succinate in
different sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria. Presence or absence of the
corresponding enzyme gene (Gen) or protein (Prot) is indicated by + and
−, respectively. *Data from this study. Bat: B. azoricus
thiotroph, Bah: B. azoricus host (Bettencourt
), CVo: Ca. Vesicomyosocius
okutanii (Calyptogena okutanii symbiont, Kuwahara ), CRm: Ca. Ruthia
magnifica (C. magnifica symbiont, Newton
), CEp: Ca. Endoriftia
persephone (Riftia pachyptila symbiont, Markert ), Sup: SUP05 (free-living
chemoautotroph, Walsh ),
Arc: ARCTIC96BD-19 (Swan ), Tc: Thiomicrospira crunogena Xcl-2 (Scott ). (c) Some TCA
cycle enzymes (dotted arrows 1–4) are missing in the B.
azoricus thiotroph, in contrast to SUP05. See Supplementary Table S2B for genome assemblies included in
the gene prediction for this figure.
Oxaloacetate could furthermore be converted to malate or aspartate before
transfer from host to thiotroph (Figure 5a),
as indicated by high concentrations of host Mdh (BAGiLS_010003,
0.55% gill OrgNSAF) in the gill metaproteome. The host's
aspartate transaminase AspC (CAD42721.2) was also expressed, although at
lower abundance (0.012% gill OrgNSAF; Figures
5a and b, Supplementary Table
S3). Succinate/succinyl-CoA might be produced or
interconverted to fumarate before transfer to the thiotroph by the two
host enzymes fumarate reductase/succinate dehydrogenase, Sdh
(BAGiLS_010531, Figure 5a), and
dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase component of
2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, Odh (BAGiLS_005913). Both proteins showed
significantly elevated expression levels in the symbiont-enriched
gradient pellet as compared to the host-enriched supernatant in our
study (Table 1).Uptake of malate or succinate by the thiotrophic symbiont requires the
presence of the TRAP-type C4 dicarboxylate transporter complex DctQMP,
whereas aspartate can be imported through the glutamate/aspartate
ABC transporter complex, GltIJKL, respectively (Figure 5a). Complete gene sets for both these transporter
complexes are encoded in the thiotrophic symbiont's genome. The
solute receptor component DctP (BazSymB_scaffold00004_53), a component
of the TRAP-type C4 dicarboxylate transporter complex, and the
periplasmic binding component GltI (BazSymA_Acontig00019_5) of the
glutamate/aspartate ABC transporter complex were also identified in
the thiotroph's proteome (Figure 5b
and Supplementary Table S3).
Transporters for oxaloacetate are rare in bacteria, but a citrate
transporter (BazSymA_Acontig02368_3), which is encoded in the
thiotroph's genome, shows promiscuity towards oxaloacetate as its
substrate and may therefore be used for oxaloacetate uptake in the
thiotroph (Pudlik and Lolkema, 2011).
Oxaloacetate may furthermore also be imported through the
above-mentioned TRAP-type C4 dicarboxylate transporter, which is poorly
characterized with respect to its specificity.
Is the thiotroph turning into an obligate symbiont?
The mdh and sdh genes, which are missing from the
thiotroph's genome, are present in a single gene cluster in the
symbiont's free-living relative SUP05 (Walsh
; Figure
5c). This might indicate a selective loss of these genes
during the thiotroph's transition from a free-living to a
symbiotic lifestyle, possibly driven by the presence of functional
substitutes in the host (as demonstrated in our study). The thiotrophic
symbiont may hence even be obligately dependent on the host for its
metabolic needs. The fact that no active free-living stage of the
thiotrophic B. azoricus symbiont has ever been detected in the
vent environment might support this speculation. However, as the
mdh gene (but not the sdh gene) is also absent
from the recently published genome of the free-living SUP05 member
‘Candidatus Thioglobus autotrophica' (Shah and Morris, 2015), the possibility of an
obligate symbiosis in B. azoricus remains hypothetical. It
might be speculated that a putative free-living stage of the thiotroph
– if there is one – may rely on the uptake of oxaloacetate
or other small organic molecules from the environment, circumventing the
need for the missing TCA cycle enzyme functions.
Adaptations to a symbiotic lifestyle
To identify candidate genes and proteins that are potentially involved in
symbiosis-specific functions we pursued two complementary approaches: (i) We
compared symbiont genomes and proteomes with those of their free-living
relatives. This approach revealed that chaperones and DNA-binding proteins
are extraordinarily abundant in both symbionts (see below). It furthermore
showed the unexpected presence of genes and proteins involved in CRISPR-Cas
and restriction-modification systems in the thiotrophic B. azoricus
symbiont, which may hint at a yet to be determined role of these proteins in
host-symbiont interactions (see Supplementary Results
and Discussion for details). (ii) We compared protein
expression in symbiont-enriched B. azoricus samples versus
symbiont-free samples, and in symbiont-containing tissue versus
symbiont-free tissue to identify host proteins involved in interactions with
the symbionts (see Methods for details and Supplementary Table S4 for a comprehensive list of putative
symbiosis-relevant proteins identified in our analysis). With this approach
we identified a broad repertoire of digestive enzymes, which are likely
involved in symbiont digestion (see below). We also detected 23
immune-related host proteins, of which seven had significantly higher
expression levels in symbiont-containing samples, and whose exact function
in the symbiosis is unclear (see Supplementary Results
and Discussion).
High expression of digestive enzymes in gill tissue
In our proteome analysis, we identified 58 host proteins with putative
proteolytic and carbohydrate-degrading functions (Supplementary Table S3), of which 12 were significantly
more abundant in symbiont-containing samples (whole gills and gradient
pellet) compared to symbiont-free (foot tissue) and host-enriched
samples (host-enriched supernatant, Table
1). These abundant host enzymes are likely involved in the
digestion of the symbionts. In chemoautotrophic invertebrate symbioses,
two modes of nutrient transfer from symbiont to host have been proposed:
(i) direct digestion of symbionts by the host, and/or (ii)
translocation of nutrients from symbiont tissue to the host cells,
termed ‘milking' (Streams ). Although previous observations
indicated that symbiont digestion might be the major mode of nutrient
transfer in B. azoricus (Fisher and
Childress, 1992; Streams ; Fiala-Médioni ), no direct
evidence existed so far.Seven of the host proteins with significantly higher abundances in
symbiont-containing samples were putative proteases and peptidases.
Among them were lysosomal proteases such as saposin B (BAGiLS_000621)
and cathepsin (BAGiLS_003294), which showed >80 fold and ~13 fold
higher abundance, respectively, in gills compared to foot samples
(Table 1). Lysosomes have been
implicated in symbiont digestion in gills of B. azoricus
(Fiala-Médioni ) and other bivalves (Boetius and
Felbeck, 1995) and our results further corroborate the
idea that lysosomal host proteases may facilitate the degradation of
symbiont proteins during symbiont digestion. We furthermore identified
two glycosidases (glycoside hydrolases), which were significantly
enriched in the gills (Table 1):
BAGiLS_012512 was most abundant in the gill membrane fraction,
indicating a possible involvement in the hydrolysis of bacterial
cell-surface polysaccharides (Davies and Henrissat,
1995; see Supplementary Table
S3). During symbiont digestion, some of the particularly
abundant host glycosidases in the gill tissue may also target the
methanotrophic symbiont's glycogen reserves (see above).
Abundant chaperones and bacterial nucleoid proteins in B.
azoricus symbionts
Our proteome data revealed remarkably high expression levels of molecular
chaperones in both symbionts and of histone-like DNA-binding proteins in
the thiotrophic symbiont: The chaperones GroEL, GroES, DnaJ and DnaK
together constituted 3.02% and 7.16% (gill OrgNSAF) of the
total protein abundance in the thiotroph and in the methanotroph,
respectively (Velos analysis, see Supplementary
Table S3 and Supplementary Results
and Discussion). Bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins,
such as the histone-like bacterial DNA-binding protein (Hns) and the
DNA-binding protein HU beta (HupB), constituted 16.87% (gill
OrgNSAF) in the thiotroph, the latter being the most abundant protein of
the entire gill metaproteome (Figure 3,
Supplementary Table S3). In the
thiotroph, GroEL and HupB were even more abundant than the most abundant
sulfur oxidation-related protein DsrH and the carbon-fixing RuBisCO.
High expression levels of chaperones and DNA-binding proteins have also
been observed in other symbionts (Baumann ) and in pathogenic bacteria (Neckers and Tatu, 2008), indicating that these
proteins might have a symbiosis-specific function in the B.
azoricus symbionts. As the thiotroph might be evolving into an
obligate symbiont (see above), enhanced mutation rates and corresponding
increased protein misfolding might be a possible explanation for the
observed high chaperone concentrations (see Supplementary Results and Discussion for details).
Conclusion
Our proteogenomic anaylsis of the deep-sea mussel B. azoricus and its
two uncultured symbionts provided detailed insights into the molecular
mechanisms and strategies that underpin this symbiosis, which is otherwise
difficult to access by cultivation-based approaches. The ability of the B.
azoricus symbionts to use an extensive range of energy sources
including sulfide, thiosulfate, methane and hydrogen to fuel chemosynthesis may
enable the host to exploit a wide range of environmental conditions.
Complementing metabolic pathways between the host and its symbionts point to
metabolic interdependence between the individual partners, which may
nevertheless enhance the metabolic efficiency of the consortium as a whole.
Particularly, the inability of the thiotrophic symbiont to replenish its
oxaloacetate and succinate pools and the high abundance of chaperones in their
proteome may indicate that this bacterium could be on the verge of becoming an
obligate symbiont. The potential integration of host and symbiont metabolism at
the level of TCA cycle intermediates furthermore raises some intriguing
questions on how this metabolic interconnection evolved and if it provides a
mechanism for the host to exert control on symbiont metabolism. Our study forms
a comprehensive basis for future investigations to examine how obligate
associations could evolve from facultative symbiotic partnerships.
Authors: Sébastien Duperron; Claudia Bergin; Frank Zielinski; Anna Blazejak; Annelie Pernthaler; Zoe P McKiness; Eric DeChaine; Colleen M Cavanaugh; Nicole Dubilier Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Kathleen M Scott; Stefan M Sievert; Fereniki N Abril; Lois A Ball; Chantell J Barrett; Rodrigo A Blake; Amanda J Boller; Patrick S G Chain; Justine A Clark; Carisa R Davis; Chris Detter; Kimberly F Do; Kimberly P Dobrinski; Brandon I Faza; Kelly A Fitzpatrick; Sharyn K Freyermuth; Tara L Harmer; Loren J Hauser; Michael Hügler; Cheryl A Kerfeld; Martin G Klotz; William W Kong; Miriam Land; Alla Lapidus; Frank W Larimer; Dana L Longo; Susan Lucas; Stephanie A Malfatti; Steven E Massey; Darlene D Martin; Zoe McCuddin; Folker Meyer; Jessica L Moore; Luis H Ocampo; John H Paul; Ian T Paulsen; Douglas K Reep; Qinghu Ren; Rachel L Ross; Priscila Y Sato; Phaedra Thomas; Lance E Tinkham; Gary T Zeruth Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Attila Csordas; Noemi del-Toro; José A Dianes; Johannes Griss; Ilias Lavidas; Gerhard Mayer; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Florian Reisinger; Tobias Ternent; Qing-Wei Xu; Rui Wang; Henning Hermjakob Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: D P R Herlemann; S Markert; C Meeske; A F Andersson; I de Bruijn; C Hentschker; F Unfried; D Becher; K Jürgens; T Schweder Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Svetlana M Chernitsyna; Ivan A Khalzov; Tatyana Ya Sitnikova; Tatyana V Naumova; Andrey V Khabuev; Tamara I Zemskaya Journal: Curr Microbiol Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Lizbeth Sayavedra; Manuel Kleiner; Ruby Ponnudurai; Stefan E Heiden; Andrea Thürmer; Horst Felbeck; Rabea Schlüter; Stefan M Sievert; Rolf Daniel; Thomas Schweder; Stephanie Markert Journal: Stand Genomic Sci Date: 2017-09-02