Literature DB >> 27801888

The relationship between central motor conduction time and spinal cord compression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

T Rikita1, N Tanaka1, K Nakanishi1, N Kamei1, N Sumiyoshi1, S Kotaka1, N Adachi1, M Ochi1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have reported a relationship between central motor conduction time (CMCT), which evaluates corticospinal function, and degree of spinal cord compression in patients with myelopathy. Thus, there is no consensus on predicting the degree of prolonged CMCT on the basis of the degree of spinal cord compression. If a correlation exists between CMCT and spinal cord compression, then spinal cord compression may be a useful noninvasive clinical indicator of corticospinal function. Therefore, this study evaluated the relationship between CMCT and cervical spinal cord compression measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
SETTING: Hiroshima University Hospital in Japan.
METHODS: We studied 33 patients undergoing laminoplasty. Patients exhibited significant cervical spinal cord compression on both MRI and intraoperative electrophysiological examination. We assessed transcranial magnetic stimulation measurement of CMCT; spinal cord compression parameters such as area, lateral diameter, anteroposterior diameter and flattening of the spinal cord at the lesion site and C2/3 levels on MRI; and pre- versus postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores.
RESULTS: Correlations between CMCT and flattening as well as anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord at the lesion level were observed. Strong correlations between CMCT and the ratio of the flattening and anteroposterior diameter parameters at the lesion level to that at the C2/3 level were also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of spinal cord compression may be useful for the evaluation of corticospinal function as a proxy for CMCT in patients with CSM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27801888     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  15 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of magnetic stimulation in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  D J Jaskolski; J A Jarratt; J Jakubowski
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Significant correlation between corticospinal tract conduction block and prolongation of central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Naosuke Kamei; Takahiko Hamasaki; Koji Nishida; Yoriko Touten; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  The value of somatosensory and motor evoked evoked potentials in pre-clinical spondylotic cervical cord compression.

Authors:  J Bednarík; Z Kadanka; S Vohánka; O Novotný; D Surelová; D Filipovicová; B Prokes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Motor evoked potentials elicited from erector spinae muscles in patients with thoracic myelopathy.

Authors:  S Taniguchi; T Tani; T Ushida; H Yamamoto
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Corticospinal tract conduction block results in the prolongation of central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Yasushi Fujiwara; Naosuke Kamei; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Pathophysiology and treatment for cervical flexion myelopathy.

Authors:  Yoshinori Fujimoto; Shinichi Oka; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kohichiro Nishikawa; Hiroyuki Kawagoe; Itsushi Baba
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Assessment of cervical myelopathy using transcranial magnetic stimulation and prediction of prognosis after laminoplasty.

Authors:  Jun Takahashi; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Nobuhiro Ogihara; Ikuya Yamazaki; Mikio Kamimura; Sohei Ebara; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Differential diagnosis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: literature review.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Lindsay A Tetreault; Eric M Massicotte; Paul M Arnold; Andrea C Skelly; Erika D Brodt; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics that affect treatment decision making and predict clinical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Joseph R Dettori; Jefferson R Wilson; Anoushka Singh; Aria Nouri; Michael G Fehlings; Erika D Brodt; W Bradley Jacobs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation screening for cord compression in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Y L Lo; L L Chan; W Lim; S B Tan; C T Tan; J L T Chen; S Fook-Chong; P Ratnagopal
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Natural Course and the Value of Diagnostic Techniques -WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Sachin A Borkar; Sumit Sinha; Rui Reinas; Óscar L Alves; Se-Hoon Kim; Sumeet Pawar; Bala Murali; Jutty Parthiban
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.