| Literature DB >> 27801863 |
Brian A Irving1, G Craig Wood2, Peter N Bennotti3, Ellappan Babu4, Abhishek Deshpande5, Michelle R Lent6, Anthony Petrick7, Jon Gabrielsen8, William Strodel9, Glenn S Gerhard10,11, Christopher D Still12, Vadivel Ganapathy13, David D K Rolston14,15.
Abstract
Nutrient tranters (NT) facilitate nutrient absorption and contribute to the regulation of circulating nutrients. In this cross-sectional study, we determined the associations between the level of obesity; mRNA abundance for NTs; and serum concentrations of amino acids, short-chain fatty acids, and glucose in patients with morbid obesity undergoing a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Proximal jejunal samples were obtained at the time of surgery from 42 patients (90% female, age = 42.6 ± 11.9 years, pre-operative body mass index (BMI) = 55.5 ± 11.3 kg/m²) undergoing a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. RNA was extracted from the jejunal mucosa and quantitative real-time-PCR was performed for the NTs studied. BMI negatively correlated with jejunal mRNA abundance of the amino acid NTs TauT (r = -0.625, p < 0.0001), ASCT2 (r = -0.320, p = 0.039), LAT1 (r = -0.304, p = 0.05). BMI positively correlated with jejunal mRNA abundance of the lactate/short-chain fatty acid NT SMCT1 (r = 0.543, p = 0.0002). Serum concentrations of the short-chain fatty acids, butyric, valeric, and isocaproic acid correlated positively with BMI (n = 30) (r = 0.45, r = 0.44, r = 0.36, p ≤ 0.05; respectively). Lower jejunal mRNA abundance for the amino acid NTs TauT, ASCT2, and LAT1 could protect against further obesity-related elevations in circulating amino acids. The positive correlation between BMI and the jejunal mRNA abundance of the high-affinity short-chain fatty acid/monocarboxylate transporter SMCT1 is intriguing and requires further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: gastrointestinal tract; morbid obesity; nutrient absorption; nutrient transporters; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27801863 PMCID: PMC5133071 DOI: 10.3390/nu8110683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Pre-operative sample characteristics (n = 42) *.
| Female, % | 90% ( |
|---|---|
| White, % | 98% ( |
| Age, years | 42.6 (11.9) [20, 64] |
| Body Mass Index, kg/m2 | 55.5 (11.3) [38.1, 78.4] |
| Diabetes | 29% ( |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 100.1 (33.2) [72, 264] |
| Insulin, µU/mL | 22.8 (13.1) [5, 58.9] |
| HbA1c, % | 5.9 (0.7) [5.1, 8.3] |
| HOMA-IR, | 6.04 (4.03) [1.16, 18.68] |
| Waist circumference, cm | 143.8 (19.7) [103.5, 182.9] |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 173.7 ± 38.1 [93, 266] |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 101.5 ± 30.0 [39, 178] |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 49.0 ± 12.0 [30, 86] |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 116.0 ± 55.9 [44, 350] |
| Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHg | 131.9 ± 17.4 [108, 198] |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure, mmHg | 76.1 ± 8.8 [60, 100] |
Data presented as % (n) or mean (standard deviation) [range]. * Multiply insulin values by 6 to convert to picomoles per liter; glucose values by 0.05551 to convert to millimoles per liter; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol values by 0.0259 to convert to millimoles per liter; and triglyceride values by 0.01129 to convert to millimoles per liter. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as glucose (mg/dL) × insulin (μU/mL)/405. Glucose levels were available for 40 patients, insulin for 39 patients, HbA1c for 38 patients, HOMA-IR for 39 patients, and waist circumference for 41 patients.
The jejunal mRNA abundances of the nutrient transporters (NTs) in 42 severely obese patients undergoing a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass stratified by body mass index (kg/m2). The jejunal mucosa was scraped and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. RNA was extracted from the samples and quantitative real-time–PCR was performed to determine the mRNA abundance of the NTs. The mRNA abundance for the NTs are expressed as 40-ΔC values.
| NT mRNA Abundance (40-Δ | Pearson’s Correlation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 35–44 | 45–54 | 55–64 | 65+ |
| ||||
|
| 22.7 (2.8) | 23.2 (3.3) | 21.5 (3.7) | 23.8 (1.5) | 22.4 (2) | 0.957 | 0.856 | –0.082 | 0.604 |
|
| 25.2 (3.3) | 25.1 (4.6) | 24.4 (3.3) | 26.9 (1.7) | 24.6 (2.9) | 0.834 | 0.927 | –0.066 | 0.676 |
|
| 17.2 (1.4) | 16.4 (0.8) | 16.2 (0.9) | 18.3 (1.1) | 18.0 (1.4) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.543 | 0.0002 |
|
| 21.2 (3.1) | 21.6 (3.7) | 20.0 (3.4) | 22.6 (2.8) | 20.6 (2.3) | 0.908 | 0.791 | –0.080 | 0.616 |
|
| 19.7 (3.2) | 22.7 (3.0) | 20.4 (2.9) | 18.5 (2.4) | 17.3 (1.5) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | –0.625 | <0.0001 |
|
| 19.1 (2.3) | 18.4 (2.9) | 18.4 (1.8) | 20.0 (2.4) | 19.4 (2.0) | 0.175 | 0.204 | 0.183 | 0.245 |
|
| 23.7 (3.4) | 23.4 (5.1) | 22.9 (3.4) | 25.4 (1.6) | 23.2 (2.6) | 0.695 | 0.785 | –0.043 | 0.786 |
|
| 21.7 (2.6) | 22.8 (3.0) | 20.5 (2.8) | 22.8 (1.3) | 20.7 (2.2) | 0.244 | 0.229 | –0.229 | 0.144 |
|
| 21.1 (2.6) | 22.8 (2.9) | 20.6 (2.2) | 21.0 (2.6) | 20.3 (2.5) | 0.052 | 0.046 | –0.304 | 0.050 |
|
| 21.9 (2.6) | 23.2 (2.8) | 20.9 (2.9) | 23.0 (1.6) | 20.8 (2.4) | 0.161 | 0.134 | –0.278 | 0.074 |
|
| 18.7 (2.9) | 19.8 (3.4) | 17.1 (3.3) | 19.3 (2.3) | 18.9 (2.2) | 0.881 | 0.846 | –0.050 | 0.749 |
|
| 19.7 (2.7) | 21.0 (3.1) | 18.6 (3.1) | 20.6 (1.8) | 19.0 (2.0) | 0.256 | 0.217 | –0.212 | 0.178 |
|
| 21.4 (2.8) | 22.2 (3.1) | 20.2 (3.1) | 22.6 (1.8) | 20.6 (2.6) | 0.522 | 0.434 | –0.172 | 0.275 |
|
| 20.8 (2.8) | 22.7 (4.0) | 20.6 (2.0) | 20.6 (2.7) | 19.6 (1.7) | 0.018 | 0.016 | –0.320 | 0.039 |
Data presented as mean (standard deviation); p-value1 = linear trend without adjustment; p-value2 = linear trend with adjustment for diabetes. GLUT2, glucose transporter 2 (SLC2A2); SGLT1, sodium-coupled glucose transporter 1 (SLC5A1); SMCT1, sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1 (SLC5A8); SMCT2, sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 2 (SLC5A12); TauT, taurine transporter (SLC6A6); ATB0,+, amino acid transporter B0,+ (SLC6A14); B0AT1, neutral amino acid transporter (SLC6A19); SNAT2, sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter-2; LAT1, L-type amino acid transporter 1 (SLC7A5); LAT2, L-type amino acid transporter 2 (SLC7A8); xCT, catalytic subunit of the amino acid transporter xc (SLC7A11); CAT1, cationic amino acid transporter 1 (SLC7A1); EAAT3, excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (SLC1A1); ASCT2, ASC amino acid transporter 2 (SLC1A5).
Figure 1Correlations between the mRNA abundance of the nutrient transporters (NTs) SMCT1 (a), TauT (b), LAT1 (c), and ASCT2 (d) with body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) in 42 severely obese patients undergoing a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. The jejunal mucosa was scraped and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. RNA was extracted from the samples and quantitative real-time–PCR performed for the NTs was studied. (r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient, solid line is the best fit regression line, slashed line is the 95% confidence interval). The mRNA abundance for the NTs are expressed as 40-ΔC.
Correlation between jejunal mRNA abundance of the nutrient transporters (NTs) glucose, insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, and Waist Circumference. The mRNA abundance for the NTs are expressed as 40-ΔC values *.
| Glucose | Insulin | HbA1c | HOMA-IR | Waist Circumference | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 0.193 | 0.234 | 0.160 | 0.330 | 0.188 | 0.257 | 0.212 | 0.196 | –0.018 | 0.910 |
|
| 0.174 | 0.284 | 0.173 | 0.292 | 0.154 | 0.354 | 0.227 | 0.165 | –0.013 | 0.935 |
|
| –0.126 | 0.440 | –0.239 | 0.143 | –0.232 | 0.162 | –0.296 | 0.068 | 0.476 | 0.0017 |
|
| 0.137 | 0.399 | 0.145 | 0.377 | 0.177 | 0.289 | 0.198 | 0.227 | –0.021 | 0.895 |
|
| 0.238 | 0.139 | 0.079 | 0.633 | 0.219 | 0.186 | 0.206 | 0.208 | –0.509 | 0.0007 |
|
| –0.002 | 0.989 | 0.163 | 0.320 | 0.019 | 0.909 | 0.157 | 0.339 | 0.210 | 0.187 |
|
| 0.166 | 0.307 | 0.184 | 0.261 | 0.188 | 0.259 | 0.234 | 0.152 | 0.026 | 0.870 |
|
| 0.071 | 0.665 | 0.187 | 0.255 | 0.020 | 0.905 | 0.224 | 0.171 | –0.237 | 0.135 |
|
| 0.080 | 0.624 | 0.043 | 0.795 | 0.046 | 0.785 | –0.006 | 0.969 | –0.241 | 0.130 |
|
| 0.145 | 0.371 | 0.171 | 0.299 | 0.086 | 0.608 | 0.219 | 0.181 | –0.204 | 0.200 |
|
| 0.052 | 0.749 | 0.148 | 0.367 | 0.030 | 0.858 | 0.143 | 0.384 | –0.113 | 0.481 |
|
| 0.121 | 0.455 | 0.150 | 0.362 | 0.046 | 0.786 | 0.164 | 0.318 | –0.226 | 0.155 |
|
| 0.181 | 0.265 | 0.192 | 0.243 | 0.140 | 0.402 | 0.234 | 0.152 | –0.147 | 0.358 |
|
| 0.030 | 0.856 | 0.028 | 0.866 | –0.024 | 0.888 | –0.006 | 0.970 | –0.335 | 0.032 |
* Glucose levels were available for 40 patients, insulin for 39 patients, HbA1c for 38 patients, HOMA for 39 patients, and waist circumference for 41 patients.
Association between preoperative concentrations of branched chain amino acids, aromatic amino acids, and short-chain fatty acids and BMI *.
| Mean Serum Metabolite Concentrations by BMI Quartile | Pearson’s Correlation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 35–44 | 45–54 | 55–64 | 65+ |
| ||||
| Leucine, µmol/L | 129.8 (24.3) | 117.2 (25.1) | 141.2 (27.4) | 131.7 (17.1) | 123.4 (20.9) | 0.824 | 0.828 | 0.008 | 0.965 |
| Isoleucine, µmol/L | 61.7 (14.5) | 58.1 (14.8) | 66.7 (18.9) | 63.3 (7.2) | 55.7 (11.5) | 0.677 | 0.678 | –0.125 | 0.511 |
| Valine, µmol/L | 247.6 (45.2) | 226.2 (56.1) | 265.8 (44.1) | 241.4 (25.3) | 249.3 (49.4) | 0.570 | 0.573 | 0.073 | 0.700 |
| Phenylalanine, µmol/L | 83.3 (15.9) | 71.1 (4.6) | 90.3 (19.2) | 82.4 (17.9) | 86.9 (7.7) | 0.137 | 0.145 | 0.257 | 0.171 |
| Tyrosine, µmol/L | 66.2 (19.2) | 64.0 (19.7) | 75.5 (23.1) | 54.9 (10.0) | 66.5 (15.6) | 0.692 | 0.692 | –0.107 | 0.575 |
| Butyric Acid, µmol/L | 0.55 (0.21) | 0.46 (0.10) | 0.50 (0.24) | 0.53 (0.13) | 0.74 (0.23) | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.446 | 0.013 |
| Isovaleric Acid, µmol/L | 0.34 (0.24) | 0.35 (0.22) | 0.27 (0.11) | 0.24 (0.10) | 0.56 (0.41) | 0.136 | 0.142 | 0.252 | 0.179 |
| Valeric Acid, µmol/L | 0.34 (0.13) | 0.27 (0.07) | 0.30 (0.12) | 0.39 (0.16) | 0.42 (0.12) | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.439 | 0.015 |
| Isocaproic Acid, µmol/L | 0.04 (0.04) | 0.04 (0.03) | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.07 (0.06) | 0.124 | 0.119 | 0.364 | 0.048 |
| Hexanoic Acid, µmol/L | 0.87 (0.34) | 0.69 (0.15) | 0.83 (0.26) | 0.99 (0.57) | 1.00 (0.22) | 0.073 | 0.072 | 0.292 | 0.118 |
Data presented as mean (standard deviation). p-value1 = linear trend without adjustment. p-value2 = linear trend with adjustment for diabetes. * Serum samples were available for 30 patients for the above analyses.