| Literature DB >> 27801797 |
Xiaoyan Ma1,2, Hongqiao Yang3,4, Huabin Xiong5,6, Xiaofen Li7,8, Jinting Gao9,10, Yuntao Gao11,12.
Abstract
In this paper, the multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified screen-printed electrode (MWCNTs/SPE) was prepared and the MWCNTs/SPE was employed for the electrochemical determination of the antioxidant substance chlorogenic acids (CGAs). A pair of well-defined redox peaks of CGA was observed at the MWCNTs/SPE in 0.10 mol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer (pH 6.2) and the electrode process was adsorption-controlled. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) methods for the determination of CGA were proposed based on the MWCNTs/SPE. Under the optimal conditions, the proposed method exhibited linear ranges from 0.17 to 15.8 µg/mL, and the linear regression equation was Ipa (µA) = 4.1993 C (×10-5 mol/L) + 1.1039 (r = 0.9976) and the detection limit for CGA could reach 0.12 µg/mL. The recovery of matrine was 94.74%-106.65% (RSD = 2.92%) in coffee beans. The proposed method is quick, sensitive, reliable, and can be used for the determination of CGA.Entities:
Keywords: chlorogenic acid; multi-walled carbon nanotubes; screen-printed electrode
Year: 2016 PMID: 27801797 PMCID: PMC5134456 DOI: 10.3390/s16111797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The structure of chlorogenic acid (CGA).
Figure 2Raman spectra of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and MWCNT-COOH.
Figure 3The SEM comparasion of bare screen-printed electrode (SPE) (a) and the multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified screen-printed electrode (b).
Figure 4Cyclic voltammetry curves of CGA (a) at bare SPE and (b) at MWCNTs/SPE.
Figure 5Influence of different supporting electrolytes on peak current: (a) 0.10 mol/L potassium hydrogen phosphate-potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer; (b) 0.10 mol/L phosphate buffer solutions; (c) 0.10 mol/L citric acid buffer; (d) 0.10 mol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer.
Figure 6Influence of buffer solution pH to peak current.
Figure 7Cyclic voltammetry curves of CGA at different scan rates.
Figure 8The peak current of CGA at different scan rate.
Figure 9The peak current of CGA at different concentration.
Comparison of our research with other methods for CGA detection.
| Measurement Methods | Linear Range (μg/mL) | Detection Limit (μg/mL) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| UV-Vis spectroscopy | 10.7−39.0 | 16 | [ |
| Capillary electrophoresis with chemiluminescence | 1.10−110 | 0.5 | [ |
| HPLC | 0.8−20.0 | 0.32 | [ |
| Square-wave voltammetry | 1.77−17.7 | 0.27 | [ |
| Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) using a MWCNTs/SPE | 0.17−15.8 | 0.12 | this method |
Measurement results of CGA in coffee beans (n = 5).
| CGA Sample | By This Method | Added (mg/g) | Found (mg/g) | Recovery (%) | By HPLC * (mg/g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/g) | RSD (%) | |||||
| 1 | 13.23 | 4.77 | 10.00 | 24.11 | 106.65 | 14.71 |
| 2 | 21.12 | 3.14 | 10.00 | 30.01 | 94.74 | 19.78 |
| 3 | 25.21 | 2.47 | 10.00 | 36.03 | 103.25 | 23.92 |
| 4 | 18.74 | 1.33 | 10.00 | 28.92 | 100.96 | 19.03 |
* The tested conditions of HPLC: The temperature of 25 °C, the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, the mobile phase was a mixture of acetonitrile (solvent A) and water–glacial acetic acid (99:1, v/v, pH 2.8) (solvent B).