Literature DB >> 27801630

Understanding workers' exposure: Systematic review and data-analysis of emission potential for NOAA.

E Kuijpers1, C Bekker1,2, D Brouwer1,3, M le Feber1, W Fransman1.   

Abstract

Exposure assessment for nano-objects, and their aggregates and agglomerates (NOAA), has evolved from explorative research toward more comprehensive exposure assessment, providing data to further develop currently used conservative control banding (CB) tools for risk assessment. This study aims to provide an overview of current knowledge on emission potential of NOAA across the occupational life cycle stages by a systematic review and subsequently use the results in a data analysis. Relevant parameters that influence emission were collected from peer-reviewed literature with a focus on the four source domains (SD) in the source-receptor conceptual framework for NOAA. To make the reviewed exposure data comparable, we applied an approach to normalize for workplace circumstances and measurement location, resulting in comparable "surrogate" emission levels. Finally, descriptive statistics were performed. During the synthesis of nanoparticles (SD1), mechanical reduction and gas phase synthesis resulted in the highest emission compared to wet chemistry and chemical vapor condensation. For the handling and transfer of bulk manufactured nanomaterial powders (SD2) the emission could be differentiated for five activity classes: (1) harvesting; (2) dumping; (3); mixing; (4) cleaning of a reactor; and (5) transferring. Additionally, SD2 was subdivided by the handled amount with cleaning further subdivided by energy level. Harvesting and dumping resulted in the highest emissions. Regarding processes with liquids (SD3b), it was possible to distinguish emissions for spraying (propellant gas, (high) pressure and pump), sonication and brushing/rolling. The highest emissions observed in SD3b were for propellant gas spraying and pressure spraying. The highest emissions for the handling of nano-articles (SD4) were found to nano-sized particles (including NOAA) for grinding. This study provides a valuable overview of emission assessments performed in the workplace during the occupational handling of NOAA. Analyses were made per source domain to derive emission levels which can be used for models to quantitatively predict the exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data-analyses; NOAA; emission potential

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27801630     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1252843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  4 in total

1.  Quantifying Emission Factors and Setting Conditions of Use According to ECHA Chapter R.14 for a Spray Process Designed for Nanocoatings-A Case Study.

Authors:  Antti Joonas Koivisto; Benedetta Del Secco; Sara Trabucco; Alessia Nicosia; Fabrizio Ravegnani; Marko Altin; Joan Cabellos; Irini Furxhi; Magda Blosi; Anna Costa; Jesús Lopez de Ipiña; Franco Belosi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Toward an operational methodology to identify industrial-scaled nanomaterial powders with the volume specific surface area criterion.

Authors:  Claire Dazon; Olivier Witschger; Sébastien Bau; Vanessa Fierro; Philip L Llewellyn
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2019-07-09

3.  Particle measurements of metal additive manufacturing to assess working occupational exposures: a comparative analysis of selective laser melting, laser metal deposition and hybrid laser metal deposition.

Authors:  Enrico Oddone; Roberta Pernetti; Maria Lorena Fiorentino; Elena Grignani; Daniele Tamborini; Gianluca Alaimo; Ferdinando Auricchio; Barbara Previtali; Marcello Imbriani
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.707

4.  Risk Perceptions and Safety Cultures in the Handling of Nanomaterials in Academia and Industry.

Authors:  Marie Louise Kirkegaard; Pete Kines; Katharina Christiane Jeschke; Keld Alstrup Jensen
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.179

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.