Literature DB >> 27801465

Lipid bilayer thickness determines cholesterol's location in model membranes.

Drew Marquardt1, Frederick A Heberle2, Denise V Greathouse3, Roger E Koeppe3, Robert F Standaert4, Brad J Van Oosten5, Thad A Harroun5, Jacob J Kinnun6, Justin A Williams6, Stephen R Wassall6, John Katsaras7.   

Abstract

Cholesterol is an essential biomolecule of animal cell membranes, and an important precursor for the biosynthesis of certain hormones and vitamins. It is also thought to play a key role in cell signaling processes associated with functional plasma membrane microdomains (domains enriched in cholesterol), commonly referred to as rafts. In all of these diverse biological phenomena, the transverse location of cholesterol in the membrane is almost certainly an important structural feature. Using a combination of neutron scattering and solid-state 2H NMR, we have determined the location and orientation of cholesterol in phosphatidylcholine (PC) model membranes having fatty acids of different lengths and degrees of unsaturation. The data establish that cholesterol reorients rapidly about the bilayer normal in all the membranes studied, but is tilted and forced to span the bilayer midplane in the very thin bilayers. The possibility that cholesterol lies flat in the middle of bilayers, including those made from PC lipids containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), is ruled out. These results support the notion that hydrophobic thickness is the primary determinant of cholesterol's location in membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27801465     DOI: 10.1039/c6sm01777k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  16 in total

1.  All n-3 PUFA are not the same: MD simulations reveal differences in membrane organization for EPA, DHA and DPA.

Authors:  Xiaoling Leng; Jacob J Kinnun; Andres T Cavazos; Samuel W Canner; Saame Raza Shaikh; Scott E Feller; Stephen R Wassall
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Permeability.

Authors:  Richard M Venable; Andreas Krämer; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Structural insights on biologically relevant cationic membranes by ESR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Julio H K Rozenfeld; Evandro L Duarte; Tiago R Oliveira; M Teresa Lamy
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-08-23

4.  With Lipid Rafts, Context Is Everything.

Authors:  Frederick A Heberle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Reconstitution of Membrane-associated Components of a G-protein Signaling Pathway on Membrane-coated Nanoparticles (Lipobeads).

Authors:  Michael J Irwin; Xin Wang; Rick H Cote
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Systematic measurements of interleaflet friction in supported bilayers.

Authors:  Autumn A Anthony; Osman Sahin; Murat Kaya Yapici; Daniel Rogers; Aurelia R Honerkamp-Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.699

7.  Posttranslational modifications optimize the ability of SARS-CoV-2 spike for effective interaction with host cell receptors.

Authors:  Karan Kapoor; Tianle Chen; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  A Database of Predicted Binding Sites for Cholesterol on Membrane Proteins, Deep in the Membrane.

Authors:  Anthony G Lee
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Determining Cholesterol Binding to Membrane Proteins by Cholesterol 13C Labeling in Yeast and Dynamic Nuclear Polarization NMR.

Authors:  Matthew R Elkins; Ivan V Sergeyev; Mei Hong
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Interfacial Binding Sites for Cholesterol on TRP Ion Channels.

Authors:  Anthony G Lee
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.