Literature DB >> 27800578

SCEGRAM: An image database for semantic and syntactic inconsistencies in scenes.

Sabine Öhlschläger1, Melissa Le-Hoa Võ2.   

Abstract

Our visual environment is not random, but follows compositional rules according to what objects are usually found where. Despite the growing interest in how such semantic and syntactic rules - a scene grammar - enable effective attentional guidance and object perception, no common image database containing highly-controlled object-scene modifications has been publically available. Such a database is essential in minimizing the risk that low-level features drive high-level effects of interest, which is being discussed as possible source of controversial study results. To generate the first database of this kind - SCEGRAM - we took photographs of 62 real-world indoor scenes in six consistency conditions that contain semantic and syntactic (both mild and extreme) violations as well as their combinations. Importantly, always two scenes were paired, so that an object was semantically consistent in one scene (e.g., ketchup in kitchen) and inconsistent in the other (e.g., ketchup in bathroom). Low-level salience did not differ between object-scene conditions and was generally moderate. Additionally, SCEGRAM contains consistency ratings for every object-scene condition, as well as object-absent scenes and object-only images. Finally, a cross-validation using eye-movements replicated previous results of longer dwell times for both semantic and syntactic inconsistencies compared to consistent controls. In sum, the SCEGRAM image database is the first to contain well-controlled semantic and syntactic object-scene inconsistencies that can be used in a broad range of cognitive paradigms (e.g., verbal and pictorial priming, change detection, object identification, etc.) including paradigms addressing developmental aspects of scene grammar. SCEGRAM can be retrieved for research purposes from http://www.scenegrammarlab.com/research/scegram-database/ .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye-movements; Image database; Scene grammar; Scene perception; Semantic and syntactic inconsistency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27800578     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0820-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Artificial cognition: How experimental psychology can help generate explainable artificial intelligence.

Authors:  J Eric T Taylor; Graham W Taylor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-11-06

2.  The Linguistic Analysis of Scene Semantics: LASS.

Authors:  Dylan Rose; Peter Bex
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-12

3.  Learning to see again: Perceptual learning of simulated abnormal on- off-cell population responses in sighted individuals.

Authors:  Rebecca B Esquenazi; Kimberly Meier; Michael Beyeler; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps.

Authors:  Marek A Pedziwiatr; Matthias Kümmerer; Thomas S A Wallis; Matthias Bethge; Christoph Teufel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  DeepGaze III: Modeling free-viewing human scanpaths with deep learning.

Authors:  Matthias Kümmerer; Matthias Bethge; Thomas S A Wallis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  Do Children With Developmental Language Disorder Activate Scene Knowledge to Guide Visual Attention? Effect of Object-Scene Inconsistencies on Gaze Allocation.

Authors:  Andrea Helo; Ernesto Guerra; Carmen Julia Coloma; Paulina Aravena-Bravo; Pia Rämä
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-07

7.  You won't believe what this guy is doing with the potato: The ObjAct stimulus-set depicting human actions on congruent and incongruent objects.

Authors:  Yarden Shir; Naphtali Abudarham; Liad Mudrik
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.